@bbgxd
@DoctorAllcome
I really hope this will make sense. If it doesn't I do apologise, I'm down with a cold and English is my second language. Most things make sense in my head...but only in my head.
I don't know about USA, but the UK foster care system is crumbling. Too many children,not enough people or funds. They are struggling.
That number of children is not static,neither is their age. They will grow. Then if you add at least a third (let's say all the other mothers changed their mind and decided to raise the baby) of the yearly number of abortion to that,the number raises exponentially. Even if most get adopted, there will still be some left behind for various reasons (disability,an ethnicity that is not "popular",not enough adopters,incompatibility etc) and they end up in the system as well. Don't forget that the process can take months and even years sometimes, so none of them will be newborns anyway. Not long before they're over the desirable age for adoption as well. And then you get a new wave of kids ending up in care due to abuse,neglect,loss of parents etc and a new wave of babies being put up for adoption. Year after year
How long do you think the system will cope? How many children would be acceptable to fall through the cracks and be left in the system?
It really doesn't matter how many people are willing to adopt newborns, there will never be enough to not have a roll on effect on both the number of children already in care AND in increasing that number of children.
That's what bugs me about the adoption argument.