Do you think it's acceptable that another woman and her baby in exactly the same situation would have died because she was a single mother or that her husband couldn't get the time off work or was needed to look after other children at home? I don't believe you do.
My husband being there had no bearing on how ill I was. I was diagnosed at a routine antenatal appointment, admitted for 2 weeks and then deteriorated very quickly.
I needed support afterwards - practically because I was initially too ill to go anywhere. My only contact about my baby was my husband. I only got news about him, saw a photo because my husband relayed it to me. Without that link I had no way of knowing how my son was doing. Other post natal women on the ward had their babies with them though. So they got to see their babies, to hold them, to care for them. Flipping your argument - do you think it was acceptable for me to suffer that while other mothers didn't because I couldn't have my husband with me?
Emotionally we needed to be together at that time. We were both in shock. We needed each other to get through it.
Your argument is that I should have suffered through that on my own in order that other women on the ward, who were celebrating a very happy time, could be spared having a man on the ward?
Yes, care needs to be better but even if it happens at some point, it's not going to happen anytime soon.
No amount of nursing care could have made that any better for me. How were they ever going to have enough staff to go up and down 4 flights to check on my baby for me when I wanted or to take me down to him and bring me back whenever I wanted?
I didn't want to see or gear other babies. I didn't want to see or hear other women and their visitors celebrating, cuddling babies, enjoying that time. I had to put up with it though didn't I? Would you argue that I had the right to ban it all because it affected, and still does affect me?