My feed
Premium

Please
or
to access all these features

Feminism: Sex & gender discussions

Breastfeeding is now chestfeeding, Brighton’s trans-friendly midwives are told

607 replies

Mulletsaremisunderstood · 09/02/2021 17:41

www.thetimes.co.uk/article/breastfeeding-is-now-chestfeeding-brightons-trans-friendly-midwives-are-told-pwlvmcnc7

Hope this link works as I am a subscriber to the times and logged in.

More nonsense being peddled as 'progressive' Angry. When will the madness end!!?

OP posts:
Report
Changethetoner · 09/02/2021 17:44

Fair enough to modify their language IF there is a "man" who is attempting to feed their own baby -but why offend the 99.9% of women who are trying to do it. Ridiculous nonsense.

Report
babybabyMilkno · 09/02/2021 17:48

I don’t understand sorry if I put this clumsily and offend anyone
I have asd so do that a lot

Why does it need to change? Men and women have breasts ? Men and women have chests but you feed from breasts? Men and women can both get breast cancer too so why does it need to change when anatomically both have chests and breasts just women have breasts that produce milk (but can’t some men I’ve read)
I don’t know it’s just confusing

Report
Ereshkigalangcleg · 09/02/2021 17:51

Performative wokery. Female erasure.

Report
Ereshkigalangcleg · 09/02/2021 17:51

Chestfeeding isn't a neutral term.

Report
PanamaPattie · 09/02/2021 17:52

I agree with PP, men and women have breasts and nipples. Breastfeeding suits all?

Report
AfternoonToffee · 09/02/2021 17:55

I have read some of the comments on the FB Times article. I could cry. Women are happily throwing others under a bus just to appease a tiny minority.

Report
Jumpintothefire · 09/02/2021 17:56

Ffs that's appalling

Report
merrymouse · 09/02/2021 17:57

@babybabyMilkno

I don’t understand sorry if I put this clumsily and offend anyone
I have asd so do that a lot

Why does it need to change? Men and women have breasts ? Men and women have chests but you feed from breasts? Men and women can both get breast cancer too so why does it need to change when anatomically both have chests and breasts just women have breasts that produce milk (but can’t some men I’ve read)
I don’t know it’s just confusing

Exactly - why is ‘breast’ feeding upsetting if men also have breasts and women have chests?
Report
Covidcorvid · 09/02/2021 18:01

I can’t read the whole article.

But from what I can read I’m fairly annoyed.

I’m a midwife, we’ve been approached by TRAs telling us to modify our official language in such ways, we’ve always refused. We offer women centred care and 99.9% of our service users identify as women.

Of course we would “be kind” if we had an individual who didn’t identify as a woman. We would happily use their preferred pronouns, whatever name they wanted and refer to them as a man, use the term chest feeding, etc.

But we are not taking language away in official policies, etc. Words matter.

Report
Dancingrandomly · 09/02/2021 18:08

@babybabyMilkno

I don’t understand sorry if I put this clumsily and offend anyone
I have asd so do that a lot

Why does it need to change? Men and women have breasts ? Men and women have chests but you feed from breasts? Men and women can both get breast cancer too so why does it need to change when anatomically both have chests and breasts just women have breasts that produce milk (but can’t some men I’ve read)
I don’t know it’s just confusing

I have often wondered about this too. Men have breast tissue and can get breast cancer. So using the word "chestfeeding" isn't logical in any sense (apart from being another "win" in the the erasure of women perhaps).
Report
gardenbird48 · 09/02/2021 18:11

this is so awful, I'm running out of words.

Report
PerpetuallyUnderwhelmed · 09/02/2021 18:13

My god, why were there no objections during the presumably lengthy process to approve this?!

Comments on The Times article are gratifying at least.

Report
Dancingrandomly · 09/02/2021 18:16

@Covidcorvid

I can’t read the whole article.

But from what I can read I’m fairly annoyed.

I’m a midwife, we’ve been approached by TRAs telling us to modify our official language in such ways, we’ve always refused. We offer women centred care and 99.9% of our service users identify as women.

Of course we would “be kind” if we had an individual who didn’t identify as a woman. We would happily use their preferred pronouns, whatever name they wanted and refer to them as a man, use the term chest feeding, etc.

But we are not taking language away in official policies, etc. Words matter.

That great to read Covidcorvid.
Report
merrymouse · 09/02/2021 18:17

From the report:

“We also recognise that there is currently biological essentialism and transphobia present within elements of mainstream birth narratives and discourse”

Biological essentialism????

Report
Ereshkigalangcleg · 09/02/2021 18:19

Stupid TRA language.

Report
Mulletsaremisunderstood · 09/02/2021 18:23

@merrymouse

From the report:

“We also recognise that there is currently biological essentialism and transphobia present within elements of mainstream birth narratives and discourse”

Biological essentialism????

Yeah, what does biological essentialism even mean? Believing in biology?

It reads like some TRA propaganda leaflet.
OP posts:
Report
Coconutfatfeast · 09/02/2021 18:28

The hospital I gave birth at refer to breastfeeding as chestfeeding on their Facebook page and refuse to use the words woman/mother on any of their social media. They use birthing parent. I’m not a birthing parent, I’m a mother!!!

Report
nicky7654 · 09/02/2021 18:28

Hilarious 😆

Report
Covidcorvid · 09/02/2021 18:33

@Coconutfatfeast

The hospital I gave birth at refer to breastfeeding as chestfeeding on their Facebook page and refuse to use the words woman/mother on any of their social media. They use birthing parent. I’m not a birthing parent, I’m a mother!!!

I wish women would comment to this effect on all such fb posts. Non stop.
Report
Ireallywantsomechips · 09/02/2021 18:34

This is a sincere question which is probably hugely offensive to some but I genuinely don’t understand.

If you do not identify as a woman but are using the biologically female parts of you to reproduce is that not somewhat hypocritical?

Report
PerpetuallyUnderwhelmed · 09/02/2021 18:36

Of course it is hypocritical but you're not allowed to say that. Or you are too stupid to understand the vagaries of gender identity Hmm

Report
merrymouse · 09/02/2021 18:37

It’s just another way of telling women that there is something wrong with them because they have breasts.

Given that breast and chest are often used interchangeably, the only possible reasoning can be that there is something distasteful about using a word that has more recently been more associated with women’s bodies.

Of course the NHS should be sensitive to people who suffer from dysphoria, but that shouldn’t mean normalising it for everyone else.

Report

Don’t want to miss threads like this?

Weekly

Sign up to our weekly round up and get all the best threads sent straight to your inbox!

Log in to update your newsletter preferences.

You've subscribed!

Moirarose2021 · 09/02/2021 18:37

It's nonscence, if you are that triggered my female words/pronouns, how can you cope getting pregnant, pregnancy and birth?

Report
Thisistherhythmofthenight · 09/02/2021 18:41

They may identify as a man and thats fine but biologically they are female hence why they can carry and birth a child. Get a bit tired of the whole men menstruate too stuff. No, no you fucking don't.

Report
Covidcorvid · 09/02/2021 18:44

The news story has hit the daily mail now and from reading that they say it’s an extra word. So the term will now be breast or chest feeding. They will talk about woman or birthing person depending on the individual. They will add alternative phrases to their policies, etc. But they won’t remove original terms. Which seems a lot better.

Report
Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.