So when he tweeted it, everyone was to understand he didn’t mean it? I’m not buying that.
Well of course you aren’t, you’re in the “Glinner is evil camp because he thinks trans women are men” camp.
This is somewhat different as it was posted at a time when there is a push to repeal the 19th Amendment.
There is no push to repeal the 19th Amendment, this is conspiracy theory nonsense.
Well, he did post it, so it’s not so silly of me to infer anything.
It’s silly of you to infer a ludicrous extrapolation.
I do think, for whatever reason, that it’s baffling you’ve rushed to defend someone who is a supporter of ending voting rights for women.
Because I don’t think he is, silly!
This is overreach of the argument here
It’s really not. That’s the whole point of bringing up that tweet, to tar the opposition to men being women with the same brush. Plus ça change.
The reason I think so is because he tweeted it.
He didn’t even say “I think the 19th amendment should be appealed”!
Perhaps you should consider why you are “vehemently” defending such a person.
I defend the notion that anyone’s one off tweet cannot be taken as evidence of someone’s definitive position on anything, and I defend the notion that anyone who doesn’t immediately condemn him supports whatever his position might actually be and I defend the notion that whatever his definitive position might be it in no way undermines his correct belief that men can’t be women. HTH.