Sorry, I don't buy it.
Generally a good faith poster puts their own views in to play as well.
It's the use of the word "we" that jars.
Certainly there is a community of regulars on FWR but "we" are also a bunch of individuals who tend to work out what we think on important questions in daylight through discusion on the threads. The groupthink, such as it is, is mostly just in jokes and eyerolling at the ongoing groundhog day nature of TRActivist and TRAlly points.
The natural question for one of "us" would be "I'm not sure how I feel about this because XYZ....what do you think?" (or "what does everyone else think?") expecting to get a range of responses. It would be very weird to ask what "we" think about a topic as if there's some sort of agreed stance before the fact.
I have actually been noticing this a lot recently - posts asking what "we" think about some small and pretty innocuous social media or news post in what seems to be an attempt to elicit intolerant or petty responses, or a pile on against some poor individual like Orc guy So thank you for giving me an opportunity to flag something that has been niggling at me.
For the record:
I think it's great that small communities want to run Pride events as long as they are grassroots from the local LGB community not bussed in by activitss from elsewhere who either think they "should" have Pride event or are actually hoping to create a negative reaction they can leverage for publicity and don't care that this will actually hurt the local LGB community.
I also think that Genderism is a regressive sexist belief system and that adding T to LGB has diverted Pride into destructive and divisive political posturing instead of celebrating the existence and visibility and normality of being same sex attracted.