Anyone posting about Article 8 should be posting about the restrictions to that right as well.
It is very often ignored.
https://www.equalityhumanrights.com/human-rights/human-rights-act/article-8-respect-your-private-and-family-life
Article 8 protects your right to respect for your private and family life.
The EHRC link covers what this means. Including these restrictions:
Restrictions to the right to respect for your private and family life
There are situations when public authorities can interfere with your right to respect for private and family life, home and correspondence. This is only allowed where the authority can show that its action is lawful, necessary and proportionate in order to:
protect national security
protect public safety
protect the economy
protect health or morals
prevent disorder or crime, or
protect the rights and freedoms of other people.
Action is ‘proportionate’ when it is appropriate and no more than necessary to address the problem concerned.
These restrictions keep getting missed out and directly contradict your claim of having a ‘right’ to not be ‘othered’ if someone’s definition of ‘othered’ is that a male person should not be accessing female single sex provisions.
Which is also contradictory when you consider that if a male person is not a ‘female’ for sport, prisons and whatever else you personally support them not accessing, how do they then access other provisions that are single sex without othering themselves.
This partial access is ‘othering’ as many male people with transgender identities have pointed out themselves. If they have to say, I can do this but not this because I am not considered a female for those purposes, it means I am not what I say I am in material reality.