Help end medical misogyny. Sign our petition.

Help end medical misogyny.
Sign our petition.

Sign the petition

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Rupert Lowe’s rape gang enquiry, report published

780 replies

Yddraigoldragon · 16/06/2026 20:50

The report has been published, link below.

http://bit.ly/4uE5odw

It is harrowing.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
24
Catpuss66 · 17/06/2026 14:47

Baroness Casey report just in case anyone would like to read.

www.gov.uk/government/speeches/baroness-caseys-audit-of-group-based-child-sexual-exploitation-and-abuse

OhGoshNotAgain · 17/06/2026 14:47

I have nothing but sympathy and admiration for the victims of this scandal. Their bravery in giving testimony for this report, without the benefit of the support which would be offered as part of the official inquiry, is admirable.

Many posters here are yelling ‘why don’t you believe the victims?’ at posters questioning the motives of those commissioning the report.

As far as I can see, almost no posters are disbelieving the victims. What is totally objectionable in this discourse is that those of you supporting Rupert Lowe because he commissioned this report (using other people’s money) cannot see that the victims, and all of you supporting him, are being massively exploited for political and personal gain, by precisely the people you think are championing them.

Very rich white men on the right are not at all concerned about poor women and girls. It is clear in all their rhetoric, the proposals to disadvantage women through the tax system, plans to wreck the NHS and sell it their rich friends, the cosying up to other predatory men (apparently okay as long as they are white) and the willingness to exploit women like Sammy Woodhouse, who somehow found herself platformed at a fascist event, having been either conned or manipulated into it.

Those victims deserve better treatment than to be used in a dangerous political game by powerfully-backed, foreign-funded, fascist-leaning men who want to disrupt the usual checks and balances we have in our political system, and win power for its own sake and their personal gain, and then will turn on the very people they have exploited to get there. Anyone who believes that Restore or Reform have the best interests of the working people of this country at heart, and will work to improve their lives, needs to get off social media, start reading some history, look at the state of other countries which have fallen into the same trap and have a big think before they approach a ballot box again.

It’s not the victim testimonies which are being objected to. It’s the exploitation and manipulation by those seeking to gain from publishing them in this report, bookended as it is by propaganda.

Northermcharn · 17/06/2026 14:49

PollyNomial · 17/06/2026 14:43

I did; it's a shame it didn't satisfy you but there is no convention, rule or law to say that I must.

No you didn't. You replied with a post. But you did not answer my question.

SionnachRuadh · 17/06/2026 14:50

SleeplessInWherever · 17/06/2026 14:46

The “250,000” figure is a guesstimate, based on nationalising the figures in a small group of LAs.

It’s not fact, and shouldn’t be said as if it is.

Whatever the number is, it’s that exact amount too many, but the 250,000 specifically is not proven.

Every time I see that figure, I know where they got it from.

It was Malcolm Pearson in a House of Lords debate in 2019, taking 1400 identified victims in Rotherham and scaling that up to the national level.

But, even accounting for underreporting, most English towns (thankfully) are not Rotherham.

The Rupert Report takes the 250,000, and not only assumes it to be rigorously established fact, but says it's a bare minimum.

Any experts who have examined this say that, while the number is sure to be horrific, there simply isn't good enough data to make an estimate (and the fact that there isn't good data is a big part of the problem).

Catpuss66 · 17/06/2026 14:52

PeachOctopus · 17/06/2026 14:41

He was independently wealthy before entering politics, I don’t think his X income makes that much difference to him.
Whatever you can say about Lowe and there are many negatives it’s not fair to characterise him as a grifter.
Whatever the recommendations of the report offer should be taken seriously, 250000 girls abused is quite enough.

It was a question really, I had no idea really who he was. Not really man of the people though is he. Yes I agree with Pakistani grooming gangs but they aren’t the only grooming gangs most are predominately white British males, some black African now Middle Eastern. This should not be highlighted as a racial the it is more of a man thing.

SleeplessInWherever · 17/06/2026 14:56

SionnachRuadh · 17/06/2026 14:50

Every time I see that figure, I know where they got it from.

It was Malcolm Pearson in a House of Lords debate in 2019, taking 1400 identified victims in Rotherham and scaling that up to the national level.

But, even accounting for underreporting, most English towns (thankfully) are not Rotherham.

The Rupert Report takes the 250,000, and not only assumes it to be rigorously established fact, but says it's a bare minimum.

Any experts who have examined this say that, while the number is sure to be horrific, there simply isn't good enough data to make an estimate (and the fact that there isn't good data is a big part of the problem).

The thing that I’m struggling with, is that the report says that’s precisely where they got that number from.

The figure is specified as if it’s fact in the “Executive Summary” and then later, on page 12, explains where that estimate has been derived from, and that it is an estimate.

Which I feel like the people claiming it as fact would know, if they’d just read a little bit further. Or… read it.

Cherriesandapples1 · 17/06/2026 14:56

OhGoshNotAgain · 17/06/2026 14:47

I have nothing but sympathy and admiration for the victims of this scandal. Their bravery in giving testimony for this report, without the benefit of the support which would be offered as part of the official inquiry, is admirable.

Many posters here are yelling ‘why don’t you believe the victims?’ at posters questioning the motives of those commissioning the report.

As far as I can see, almost no posters are disbelieving the victims. What is totally objectionable in this discourse is that those of you supporting Rupert Lowe because he commissioned this report (using other people’s money) cannot see that the victims, and all of you supporting him, are being massively exploited for political and personal gain, by precisely the people you think are championing them.

Very rich white men on the right are not at all concerned about poor women and girls. It is clear in all their rhetoric, the proposals to disadvantage women through the tax system, plans to wreck the NHS and sell it their rich friends, the cosying up to other predatory men (apparently okay as long as they are white) and the willingness to exploit women like Sammy Woodhouse, who somehow found herself platformed at a fascist event, having been either conned or manipulated into it.

Those victims deserve better treatment than to be used in a dangerous political game by powerfully-backed, foreign-funded, fascist-leaning men who want to disrupt the usual checks and balances we have in our political system, and win power for its own sake and their personal gain, and then will turn on the very people they have exploited to get there. Anyone who believes that Restore or Reform have the best interests of the working people of this country at heart, and will work to improve their lives, needs to get off social media, start reading some history, look at the state of other countries which have fallen into the same trap and have a big think before they approach a ballot box again.

It’s not the victim testimonies which are being objected to. It’s the exploitation and manipulation by those seeking to gain from publishing them in this report, bookended as it is by propaganda.

Exactly this

AstonScrapingsNameChange · 17/06/2026 14:58

PollyNomial · 17/06/2026 10:08

And the Bible explicitly contains incest as a moral "good". In most US states there is no legal minimum age to get married. You may also have heard about the international sex trafficking ring run by that well known Muslim convert Jeffrey E who has ties to other Muslims like Andrew and Donald.

That is a daft comparison.

I think there are a few instances when making what most people consider an allegory of Adam and Eves descendants populating the earth (there is a lot of really weird stuff in Genesis).

The Bible explicitly forbids incest in a number of places, both in the laws laid down by Moses in the old testament, and Paul's letters rebuking the early church in the new testament.

No one could state that it forms an integral part of modern Christianity's prescribed beliefs or actions.

Wheras Mohammad is central to Islam and is, I believe, considered an example to follow.

It is very difficult to see how he is supposed to be the example to live up to , oh except not that bit.

Even if child rape is not explicitly encouraged/condoned by Islam, I don't think it's possible that that attitude towards girls doesn't bleed into the religion and culture. How could it not?

Ereshkigalangcleg · 17/06/2026 14:58

RedTagAlan · 17/06/2026 14:44

Do you mean pages 159-163 ? Longer sentences, deportations, death sentence, deport connected families, close Islamic centers and visa bans. Special provisions for children giving evidence, no fear of being called racist, a Pakistan task force, compensation for victims, and promoting the extended family and family values.

And this line on page 163:

The state should not interfere with a family’s ability to protect itself from harm.

I never said I disagree with them.

What I do see is a report with a lot of dodgy figures and no evidence that these recommendations are what is needed.

You specifically said the report said “nothing” about helping anybody. You weren’t being honest, were you? As I said, the content of the recommendations, whether they are sensible or not and that you disagree with most of them is not the point.

Everanewbie · 17/06/2026 14:59

SallySharp · 17/06/2026 14:33

I have just checked on Muslim Mumsnet and there is no thread on the topic of Gang Rape.

Yes, notice that the recent conviction for the murder of Henry Novak was met with calls from the Sikh association for an enquiry into failures of the police in this case. Contrast this with Pakistani/Muslim associations who cry bigotry and victimhood at every opportunity rather than accept the rotten apples in their midst, particularly when it comes to extremism and rape gangs.

RedTagAlan · 17/06/2026 14:59

Ereshkigalangcleg · 17/06/2026 14:58

You specifically said the report said “nothing” about helping anybody. You weren’t being honest, were you? As I said, the content of the recommendations, whether they are sensible or not and that you disagree with most of them is not the point.

Sorry. I was referring to conclusions.

IdaGlossop · 17/06/2026 15:05

I have skimmed the report and shocking it is. It lacks the balance and sobriety it needs if it is to be taken seriously. Rupert Lowe is a canny operator, rolling up his sleeves and being present in a way that makes Nigel Farage look like a showman. In this report, anti-immigration, anti-multi-cultural evidence has been gathered, paid for by the public, which he can now use to take votes from Reform and Labour.

The fact that the UK is in the dangerous position of the far and extreme right encroaching upon mainstream politics should shame Labour and the Conservatives, who by failing to act effectively in 2008, when it became clear that mass immigration from the Middle East and Africa, was coming to Europe, have facilitated the creation of a new political order.

Typo

MrsBunny2018 · 17/06/2026 15:06

TheContoursALittleMisunderstandingNsoul · 17/06/2026 09:00

The death penalty will never be reintroduced and neither it should be so that's a complete non starter.
Heavy sentences should be handed down though.

It absolutely should be for certain crimes.

IdaGlossop · 17/06/2026 15:10

MrsBunny2018 · 17/06/2026 15:06

It absolutely should be for certain crimes.

There is no absolutely about it. Rupert Lowe is forgetting, when he cites Christianity as the faith of the UK, that Christians are not permitted to kill. That injunction includes state murder.

5MinuteArgument · 17/06/2026 15:12

I've worked in the public sector. I've seen at first hand the mentality where social workers, local councils, NHS, police, state media etc will tie themselves up in knots in order to maintain their 'progressive' ideology where ethnic minorities are always the victims or good guys and can never be oppressors.

It's so unrealistic and unnecessary and it only causes resentment. People should all be treated without fear or favour.

southerngirl10 · 17/06/2026 15:16

It's shocking what happened these poor girls. Unfortunately, although most men from these countries are law abiding, some, who are not, are here already and going nowhere. It's going to be in the back of people's minds. More reason to mistrust and be grateful our girls are home all evening instead of out playing in the street, like they used to.

justasking111 · 17/06/2026 15:18

My DIL grew up in w Yorkshire. The harassment and fear is real girls from families who are vigilant about this live with fear. The last two years in Leeds it's got worse she said. They're emboldened by the cover ups and lack of action. It's not just locals they're cherry picking students. You can't trust the taxis now.

IdaGlossop · 17/06/2026 15:25

5MinuteArgument · 17/06/2026 15:12

I've worked in the public sector. I've seen at first hand the mentality where social workers, local councils, NHS, police, state media etc will tie themselves up in knots in order to maintain their 'progressive' ideology where ethnic minorities are always the victims or good guys and can never be oppressors.

It's so unrealistic and unnecessary and it only causes resentment. People should all be treated without fear or favour.

I can imagine how difficult it must be in some public sector organisations. My DD and a friend, both white, were playing the the school yard (state school) when they were in Y6. A male classmate of West Indian heritage, had taught himself a rap whose lyrics said white girls are easy and will go with anyone. The friend insisted they report the incident to a teacher. A few of the school staff met and realised that had a white boy sung an equivalent rap to two black girls, they would have recorded it as a racist incident. So they recorded it as the school's first anti-white racist incident, then rang me to let me know.

The incident revealed that like them, I saw only ethnic minorities as victims of racism as my first thought when hearing DD had been involved in a racist incident was to think about how we would handle having a racist DD.

OhGoshNotAgain · 17/06/2026 15:25

justasking111 · 17/06/2026 15:18

My DIL grew up in w Yorkshire. The harassment and fear is real girls from families who are vigilant about this live with fear. The last two years in Leeds it's got worse she said. They're emboldened by the cover ups and lack of action. It's not just locals they're cherry picking students. You can't trust the taxis now.

As someone who was once in a taxi with John Warboys, I can confidently say you never really could trust them. And minicabs were known to be a bad idea for young women even in the 90s.

southerngirl10 · 17/06/2026 15:27

justasking111 · 17/06/2026 15:18

My DIL grew up in w Yorkshire. The harassment and fear is real girls from families who are vigilant about this live with fear. The last two years in Leeds it's got worse she said. They're emboldened by the cover ups and lack of action. It's not just locals they're cherry picking students. You can't trust the taxis now.

That's so sad. It makes me feel really angry. It has echoes through the country, even in the south where we live. Yet, it's all hushed up in case it causes offence. We should be shouting what happened from the rooftops and making sure it stops happening. Smash the...

SleeplessInWherever · 17/06/2026 15:31

OhGoshNotAgain · 17/06/2026 15:25

As someone who was once in a taxi with John Warboys, I can confidently say you never really could trust them. And minicabs were known to be a bad idea for young women even in the 90s.

I don’t think I’ve ever trusted a taxi, apart from the one my uncle drives.

I have never, and would never, either get a taxi home from a night out by myself, or allow a female I was out with to do so.

GreyskySexRealistsky · 17/06/2026 15:31

justasking111 · 17/06/2026 15:18

My DIL grew up in w Yorkshire. The harassment and fear is real girls from families who are vigilant about this live with fear. The last two years in Leeds it's got worse she said. They're emboldened by the cover ups and lack of action. It's not just locals they're cherry picking students. You can't trust the taxis now.

This.
Our communities deserve answers too. Why was this allowed to go on in the places where we live? We are owed an explanation. Obviously the priority is the girls and young women. But our communities want accountability too.

ilovebrie8 · 17/06/2026 15:38

justasking111 · 17/06/2026 15:18

My DIL grew up in w Yorkshire. The harassment and fear is real girls from families who are vigilant about this live with fear. The last two years in Leeds it's got worse she said. They're emboldened by the cover ups and lack of action. It's not just locals they're cherry picking students. You can't trust the taxis now.

I was in Leeds recently and all Ubers/taxi drivers were Pakistani drivers.
I saw no white taxi drivers at all in Leeds, not one.
I wouldn’t take a taxi after dark I did daytime but not sure I’d do it a again.

luckylavender · 17/06/2026 15:45

Northermcharn · 17/06/2026 14:21

Ha ha - you just can't bring yourself to answer can you? I'm embarrassed for you. It's a straightforward question.

You said:

'No, I think he's [Rupert Lowe's] a populist. He'll say anything'

'I wouldn't trust Rupert Lowe as far as I could throw him. This week he said Tommy Robinson would be welcome in his party. He's financed by Elon Musk. Rupert Lowe cares about Rupert Lowe, not women and girls.'

Do you think that [the fact you don't trust RL] means the testimonies of the victims, provided in the report, should be ignored?

Ok I'll put this another way; I would be far more likely to listen to such testimonies in a process run by someone else. I would add that this is a horrific problem which is as old as time. And it seems strange to me that Rupert Lowe is suddenly interested in this problem when he has a 'political party' to promote and position and when one of his funders is Elon Musk who has an agenda.