The question, I suppose, is whether you would learn anything from this report that you wouldn't learn if you'd been listening to Maggie Oliver or Claire Adams or Donna Edmunds or Adam Wren. Or if you'd read Jay or Casey. And I don't think you would.
What we've got is harrowing testimonies from survivors, topped and tailed with shonky sub-GCSE prose that doesn't pass muster as any sort of inquiry report.
Survivors were told this would all have legal input - some were given to understand the report would be signed off by a KC - and it turns out to have been produced, right in time for the by-election, by Lowe staffer Harrison Pitt, Lowe staffer Charlie Downes, and Lotus Munchers podcaster Josh Ferme - none of whom seems to have any background in law, criminology, statistics or research methodology.
And - bearing in mind Labour and its media outriders have spent decades saying anyone noticing these crimes was a far right agitator acting in bad faith - is it helpful to have people with actual far right connections fronting this?
Fuck knows I have little patience with the tribal leftists on FWR, but I don't think Sammy Woodhouse going to Portugal last month to speak at Martin Sellner's ethnic cleansing summit is something that helps the survivor community.
YMMV.