I said beyond what the victims said. Do I really need to explain what I mean by that? For example, here is a bit of the report beyond what the victims said.
Page 116, quote :
"Britain is not a unique case. This sort of thing goes on anywhere that either welcomes mass migration from Muslim countries or contains long-established Muslim populations. There is a consistent pattern of sexual violence directed against non-Muslim minorities in settings where Muslims form the majority. 27"
Footnote 27 references a UN Human rights reports about Pakistan, and only in Pakistan. The UN report does not support the claim being made.
Here is the report referenced:
Pakistan: UN experts alarmed by lack of protection for minority girls from forced religious conversions and forced marriage | OHCHR
If the Lowe report is really intended to help prevent this happening, then I would say it needs to be impeccable in terms of evidence being presented for claims being made.
But beyond the victims statements, it does nothing in terms of a structured and well put argument for it's conclusions. Therefore, it is practically a disservice to the victims.