Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Do transmen suffer from a form of autogynephilia or do they have 'genuine' gender dysphoria?

136 replies

GaIadriel · 26/05/2026 21:21

Not looking to stir things up although I do appreciate this may be a controversial question.

I've read so much about how transwomen are often motivated by sexual perversions etc, and my kneejerk reaction is that it's certainly feasible. However, when I think about transmen it becomes a little bit more ambiguous.

I'm not sure I buy the argument that it's to 'escape from the pressures of being a female' as is often claimed because male hierarchy seems much more brutal and unforgiving to my eyes and seems to punish the 'weak' to a much greater extent.

When a female presents as male and uses male facilities (as many successfully do due to passing much more easily than most TW) what is their motivation for doing this?

OP posts:
Aisha176 · Today 09:55

TempestTost · Today 09:50

There is no trade off, that's the point. So a serious trade off isn't justified. It doesn't show improved outcomes.

Esteemed professional medical health organisations globally disagree including The Cass report despite extreme political pressure not to.

NotBadConsidering · Today 10:39

Aisha176 · Today 09:55

Esteemed professional medical health organisations globally disagree including The Cass report despite extreme political pressure not to.

Aida, you keep saying this while ignoring the organisations that acknowledge no improvements in mental health. Why?

TempestTost · Today 10:46

Aisha176 · Today 09:55

Esteemed professional medical health organisations globally disagree including The Cass report despite extreme political pressure not to.

None of the research any of these organisations has done supports the policies you are talking about - and many places are rolling them back on that basis.

Your claim that the UK has not done so is just false, as you know.

TempestTost · Today 10:57

ANyway - to get back on track with this thread - to me what this question really eveals is that the use of pornography among young women is something that needs to be urgently addressed.

And I think feminists have really dropped the ball here. Partly because they have tended to focused on the harms of standard film pornography on the actors, which is a very certainly very immediate concern.

But also for less compelling reasons. One being a tendency to dismiss the idea that written content is really pornography or can have an effect on the reader. And this comes out, I think, of the sex positivity movement that seems to have at times been embraced less critically than it ought to have been by feminists. Which claims that as long as something is a fantasy, or is freeing up women's repressed sexual desires, or whatever, it is good.

The fact is that reading this stuff, be it slash fiction, or "Morning Glory Milking Farm" is being used as a sexual outlet, and that does shape women's sexual and psychological response with a reinforcement loop just as it does with men, and it escalates just as it does with men.

Especially young women with little or no real sexual experience. There are kids - my cousin's daughter being one - that form their "trans" identity around this stuff, and it seems supported by their whole group of friends, the whole internet - even the cosplay groups they belong too seem to be entwined, (including furry groups in some cases.)

nolongersurprised · Today 11:00

Aisha176 · Today 09:26

I was waiting for this. You know that there’s a difference between PBs used when puberty is occurring too early that are then stopped vs PBs that are used when puberty is supposed to occur?

Yes but the context was parental consent for medical treatment with side effects.

The “easily reversible” trope that applies to the former can’t be assumed for the latter, esp after than Mayo study showing fibrosis and calcification of boys’ testicular tissue after a few years on blockers as “gender affirming care treatment”.

And heart attacks & strokes are potential side effects for many drugs that don't normally eventuate.

It’s moot anyway, because 97-98% of children go on to take CSH
As I said correct self selection & screening are more likely the reason.

and no one seems to follow up the ones who don’t. Reversible? Who knows?

That's why clinical trials matter.

What they can do is prevent the escalation of mental health distress which has been shown in research

You keep saying this, but you’re making it up.

"Psychological distress and self-harm are known to increase across early adolescence. Normative data show rising YSR total problems scores with age from age 11 to 16 years in non-clinical samples from a range of countries [29]. Self-harm rates in the general population in the UK and elsewhere increase markedly with age from early to mid-adolescence, being very low in 10 year olds and peaking around age 16–17 years [5356]. Our finding that psychological function and self-harm did not change significantly during the study is consistent with two main alternative explanations. The first is that there was no change, and that GnRHa treatment brought no measurable benefit nor harm to psychological function in these young people with GD. This is consonant with the action of GnRHa, which only stops further pubertal development and does not change the body to be more congruent with a young person’s gender identity. The second possibility is that the lack of change in an outcome that normally worsens in early adolescence may reflect a beneficial change in trajectory for that outcome, i.e. that GnRHa treatment reduced this normative worsening of problems."

Conclusions
Overall patient experience of changes on GnRHa treatment was positive. We identified no changes in psychological function. Changes in BMD were consistent with suppression of growth. Larger and longer-term prospective studies using a range of designs are needed to more fully quantify the benefits and harms of pubertal suppression in GD.

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7853497/

"You’re scraping the barrel here." = over the target

That study showed “no improvement in psychological function”. Did you read it?

nolongersurprised · Today 11:08

NotBadConsidering · Today 10:39

Aida, you keep saying this while ignoring the organisations that acknowledge no improvements in mental health. Why?

Oh, it’s the rolling pin dude. Yeah, I’ll stop engaging. What a waste of time.

Kalalily · Today 11:47

OP, I hope you don’t mind the numerous different tangents this thread has taken. I am very grateful for this opportunity to discuss this very complex issue

nolongersurprised · Today 12:02

-Especially young women with little or no real sexual experience. There are kids - my cousin's daughter being one - that form their "trans" identity around this stuff, and it seems supported by their whole group of friends, the whole internet - even the cosplay groups they belong too seem to be entwined, (including furry groups in some cases.)

Conversely, I’ve seen girls who identify as trans with the usual vulnerabilities (ASD/anxious/socially isolated) who then start considering their sexual proclivities within that trans bubble. Probably the end point is the same? These are all girls who have never even kissed someone, mind you.

TempestTost · Today 13:10

nolongersurprised · Today 12:02

-Especially young women with little or no real sexual experience. There are kids - my cousin's daughter being one - that form their "trans" identity around this stuff, and it seems supported by their whole group of friends, the whole internet - even the cosplay groups they belong too seem to be entwined, (including furry groups in some cases.)

Conversely, I’ve seen girls who identify as trans with the usual vulnerabilities (ASD/anxious/socially isolated) who then start considering their sexual proclivities within that trans bubble. Probably the end point is the same? These are all girls who have never even kissed someone, mind you.

Yes, if they haven't encountered all that before, they certainly will after they start interacting with that group

Kalalily · Today 13:19

nolongersurprised · Today 12:02

-Especially young women with little or no real sexual experience. There are kids - my cousin's daughter being one - that form their "trans" identity around this stuff, and it seems supported by their whole group of friends, the whole internet - even the cosplay groups they belong too seem to be entwined, (including furry groups in some cases.)

Conversely, I’ve seen girls who identify as trans with the usual vulnerabilities (ASD/anxious/socially isolated) who then start considering their sexual proclivities within that trans bubble. Probably the end point is the same? These are all girls who have never even kissed someone, mind you.

This is what is so heartbreaking. Young people who have never even kissed someone being able to self refer for medical treatment that will affect their fertility and sexual function. Therapy needs to be compulsory for this cohort

New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Swipe left for the next trending thread