“If this was true, imagine the harm more than one person just living life could do to the gender critical crusade.”
This Is pretty funny actually.
No. The statement around detransitioners is relevant because it shows the ideological flaws that are highlighted by material reality rolling on despite any person’s ‘beliefs’. That is why you point is laughable.
There is no equivalence between a male person who demands people treat him as if he is female when there is no material reality to that claim and the experience of a person who once believed they were the opposite sex and then realised they can never be the opposite sex so re-established their identity to fit the material reality of their sex category in all that category’s body variations.
A person demanding to be treated as if they are the opposite sex to what they materially are, in no way disrupts material reality which simply abides despite all the attempts by that person to force their choices as being material reality.
A person demanding others treat them as if they are the opposite aex to what they materially are, is never going to be supported by material reality. Them making their declarations has no negative impact on the opinions of those who don’t believe those male people are female in any way or vice versa.
Detransitioners can be said to show one pathway where material reality reasserts itself. Whereas a male person who ignores female people’s boundaries and accesses female single sex provisions and demands use of female language, is quite the opposite.
Those male people are demanding female people ignore material reality’s existence in their demand for people to believe their individual subjective reality claims.
It is completely illogical to make this comparison.