I’m not going to quote @SingleSexSpacesInSchools last post with the ChatGPT summary as it’s too long, but what struck me as I was reading the different points was that the transactivists biggest problem is that they don’t even have a single, coherent model for gender ideology theory.
Being Terven is relatively straightforward because there is a single, coherent model, which over time has been more and more clearly hammered out.
Like the biology of sex itself, there is a firm, underlying reality from which there is no escape. We may understand more and more about how it all works, but nothing at the core changes.
With sex, for example, it was understood and observed and even defined, long before all the discoveries about genetics, DSDs and hormonal details were uncovered. All those discoveries merely increased understanding about how sex and the body works (or fails) but none (whatever activists try to claim) undermines the fundamental principles about gamete production, upon which the concept hangs.
Terfism is the same. The more we see, the greater the understanding, unlike gender ideology theory, which needs to be bent to explain every different argument and where there is no coherent model that fits all the claims.
It’s at times like this, I’m glad to be on this side. If I was on the other, I’d either switch very quickly or drown in cognitive dissonance.