Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

National/Herald refuse to carry political ad unless word 'woman' is removed

45 replies

ArabellaScott · 21/04/2026 14:46

Astonishing.

Independence for Scotland Party reports with images from email from National/Herald. The editor/s say after 'strong feedback from readers' they refuse to carry adverts from this small political party in the National, but will carry ads in the Herald if the word 'woman' is removed.

Attaching images, hope they will work.

https://x.com/IndyScotParty/status/2046477647627083941

'This statement responds to the decision by @ScotNational
to refuse future advertising from the Independence for Scotland Party following so called “reader feedback" and to the conditional offer from The Herald to carry an advert only if it removes any reference to women. This raises serious concerns about censorship, political gatekeeping and the suppression of legitimate debate in Scotland’s media. '

National/Herald refuse to carry political ad unless word 'woman' is removed
National/Herald refuse to carry political ad unless word 'woman' is removed
OP posts:
ArabellaScott · 21/04/2026 14:49

Sorry, I've misqoted, they say they will carry ad so long as 'there is no reference to women'.

OP posts:
FruAashild · 21/04/2026 14:53

What did the ad say?

MrsOvertonsWindow · 21/04/2026 14:59

How on earth can that be legal?

TheywontletmehavethenameIwant · 21/04/2026 15:02

Wow, that's mental, is it even lawful, the press are suppose carry the news not decide what is the news. Censorship can hardly be compatible with a free press.

ArabellaScott · 21/04/2026 15:09

FruAashild · 21/04/2026 14:53

What did the ad say?

Unsure. Just posting what was on X.

OP posts:
SingleSexSpacesInSchools · 21/04/2026 15:17

Well this won't last five minutes...

ArabellaScott · 21/04/2026 15:17

Someone has posted this, I think it maybe this? Says 'women won't wheesht on women's sex based rights'

National/Herald refuse to carry political ad unless word 'woman' is removed
OP posts:
ArabellaScott · 21/04/2026 15:20

SingleSexSpacesInSchools · 21/04/2026 15:17

Well this won't last five minutes...

What won't?

OP posts:
Gasp0deTheW0nderD0g · 21/04/2026 15:23

The Herald's stance, I hope. I wonder if anyone legally qualified was consulted before this email was sent.

SingleSexSpacesInSchools · 21/04/2026 16:25

Gasp0deTheW0nderD0g · 21/04/2026 15:23

The Herald's stance, I hope. I wonder if anyone legally qualified was consulted before this email was sent.

Yes thats what I meant

singthing · 21/04/2026 16:35

I think I can hear the dulcet tunes of the Streisand Effect warming up.

ThreeWordHarpy · 21/04/2026 17:35

That’s my Herald subscription cancelled.

ArabellaScott · 21/04/2026 18:07

Do let them know why!

OP posts:
IwantToRetire · 21/04/2026 18:08

ArabellaScott · 21/04/2026 15:17

Someone has posted this, I think it maybe this? Says 'women won't wheesht on women's sex based rights'

Edited

It seems a bit strange but agree it cant just be the word women, but must be the political statement:

'women won't wheesht on women's sex based rights'

Does that mean if FWS were to stand in an election none of their political statements / ads would be accepted?!

IwantToRetire · 21/04/2026 18:12

For those not on X:

This statement responds to the decision by @ScotNational
to refuse future advertising from the Independence for Scotland Party following so called “reader feedback" and to the conditional offer from The Herald to carry an advert only if it removes any reference to women. This raises serious concerns about censorship, political gatekeeping and the suppression of legitimate debate in Scotland’s media.

No, this isn’t just “strong feedback,” this is a line being crossed. What we’ve been sent isn’t a commercial decision, it’s a political one, a decision to shut the door on a lawful political party because it dares to say things that make the comfortable uncomfortable for the Editors. A paper that wraps itself in the language of independence and democracy has just shown exactly where it stands when a real alternative appears, not beside the people, but blocking them.

Let’s call it what it is, censorship, raw, blunt, unashamed and then comes the so called “alternative,” an offer with a condition that should outrage every single person reading it, we can have NO reference to women.

Take a second and let that sink in.
A political party in Scotland is being told it can access a front page but only if it stays silent about women, silent about rights, silent about safeguarding, silent about reality and silent on one of its founding principles.

So here’s the question that needs to be answered by these so called newspapers. When are they going to tell their women readers that their sex is not relevant to their pages? Because that is exactly what this decision says, It says women don’t matter, at least not if acknowledging them disrupts a preferred narrative of the queer agenda, it says some truths are inconvenient to the trans allies and therefore must be buried, it says free speech is conditional and only exists for those who toe the TRA line.

Well here’s the problem with that, the Independence for Scotland Party does not exist to toe anyone’s line, it does not exist to ask permission, it does not exist to dilute its principles and it sure as hell does not exist to be told what it can and cannot say by editors, advertisers or anyone else who thinks they get to control the boundaries of public debate.

ISP will not be silenced, not by newspapers, not by gatekeepers, not by anyone.

If you think shutting us out of a front page stops this message you’ve fundamentally misunderstood what’s happening across this country. This isn’t about ink on paper anymore, This is about people, it is about lived experience, it is about voices that have been ignored for far too long finally refusing to be quiet and here’s the truth that should worry them most, every door you close, we’ll kick open another, every platform you deny, we’ll build our own, every attempt to silence us only proves why we must speak louder, because a movement grounded in reality cannot be erased by editorial decisions, so keep your front pages, stick your conditions where the sun don't shine, the ISP will not be controlled by arms of the British state.

The people are watching, the people are listening and no matter how hard you try you will not silence us.

https://x.com/IndyScotParty/status/2046477647627083941

ISP - Independence for Scotland Party (@IndyScotParty) on X

This statement responds to the decision by @ScotNational to refuse future advertising from the Independence for Scotland Party following so called “reader feedback" and to the conditional offer from The Herald to carry an advert only if it removes any...

https://x.com/IndyScotParty/status/2046477647627083941

RhannionKPSS · 21/04/2026 18:15

I think ISP should firstly get in touch with Free Speech Union and then crowdfund to sue the newspapers involved

moto748e · 21/04/2026 18:18

Good publicity for them, though, I'd never even heard of them; are they well-known in Scotland?

RhannionKPSS · 21/04/2026 18:20

Hopefully they will be now, the Streisand Effect will be in full swing now

RhannionKPSS · 21/04/2026 18:20

It’s a small party as far as I know, strong on women’s rights and independence for Scotland.

ArabellaScott · 21/04/2026 18:21

Very small, but standing throughout Scotland on the list vote, I think?

OP posts:
OP posts:
Igmum · 21/04/2026 18:23

That’s a great response. I hope the ISP hoover up all of the SNP votes, helped by the publicity generated by this

WearyAuldWumman · 21/04/2026 18:26

ArabellaScott · 21/04/2026 18:21

Very small, but standing throughout Scotland on the list vote, I think?

I think they're part of the Alliance that's standing on the list in Fife.

BusyAzureTraybake · 21/04/2026 18:29

As long as ... there is no reference to women in the ad

It feels impossible to fully grasp the magnitude of that statement.

WearyAuldWumman · 21/04/2026 18:32

I have just told an SNP canvasser that I refuse to vote for Jenny Gilruth because of her failure to take a stance to protect women's rights.

The chap was polite enough. I'm guessing it's not the first he's heard this.