Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Jennifer Melle wins settlement from NHS

299 replies

RoyalCorgi · 13/04/2026 12:49

Haven't seen a thread about this anywhere else, but Jennifer Melle, the nurse who refused to refer to a convicted sex offender by his preferred pronouns, and was disciplined, has won a settlement from the NHS trust she works for.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cx2vlxdnnpqo

Nurse Jennifer Melle takes part in a show of solidarity with MPs and nurses on College Green outside the Houses of Parliament in Westminster, central London, place ahead of the NHS disciplinary hearing of Christian nurse Jennifer Melle on Tuesday.

Nurse in trans dispute win settlement from NHS employer

Melle was racially abused by a transgender woman at a hospital after she addressed them as "Mr".

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cx2vlxdnnpqo

OP posts:
Thread gallery
8
Ereshkigalangcleg · 13/04/2026 14:56

AlwaysNuance · 13/04/2026 14:38

Why? The person was chained to a prison guard. Was asking to self discharge. The nurse wasn't responsible for whether this person was a danger to the public, I assume the concern was around medical safety to discharge.

How did she know this person was a convicted peadophile at the time? I can only see that the person arrived from the sex offender wing of a male prison.

If this person had been an "ordinary" trans person and NOT a violent and revolting sex offender, would it have been more or less ok to call them "Mr Jones" ?

I would defend the right of a victim of this person to call him "him". I think a professional person is held to a different standard. If they are going to treat them at all. Either a peadophile deserves medical care and professionalism or they don't. We can't say "We'll treat this ill sex offender professionally, whilst thinking they are the dregs of humanity, but not this one, because this one is trans".

I don’t believe anyone should be forced to pander to the lies and charades of these men so it’s a very easy one to answer for me.

JazzyJelly · 13/04/2026 14:57

Excellent news! I hope she's feeling relieved.

Datun · 13/04/2026 14:57

AlwaysNuance · 13/04/2026 14:38

Why? The person was chained to a prison guard. Was asking to self discharge. The nurse wasn't responsible for whether this person was a danger to the public, I assume the concern was around medical safety to discharge.

How did she know this person was a convicted peadophile at the time? I can only see that the person arrived from the sex offender wing of a male prison.

If this person had been an "ordinary" trans person and NOT a violent and revolting sex offender, would it have been more or less ok to call them "Mr Jones" ?

I would defend the right of a victim of this person to call him "him". I think a professional person is held to a different standard. If they are going to treat them at all. Either a peadophile deserves medical care and professionalism or they don't. We can't say "We'll treat this ill sex offender professionally, whilst thinking they are the dregs of humanity, but not this one, because this one is trans".

It's my recollection that he had to have a catheter removed. Him wanting to leave precipitated that. Which was the medical issue.

She hasn't said that it's got anything to do with him being a paedophile, either.

But I'm sure it does matter to some people. Some people are happy to call men female if it's a family member, but not if it's a convicted rapist.

I don't think that had a bearing on Jennifer. But it will on quite a few people.

The point is her calling him a male was perfectly legitimate, for whatever reason. Him calling her the N word and lunging at her wasn't.

We haven't reached a stage in this country where correctly identifying someone's sex is any sort of a crime. In fact, we're going in the other direction.

But be that as it may. Their issue was with her going to the press. That was what the case was about.

so, presumably, even they recognised she hadn't actually done anything wrong.

Datun · 13/04/2026 15:03

Arguments for why women must be forced to capitulate to men's demands, aside, I'm delighted that Jennifer has been vindicated.

And hope it encourages other women to go to the press. It's the only way.

solerolover · 13/04/2026 15:03

How did she know this person was a convicted peadophile at the time? I can only see that the person arrived from the sex offender wing of a male prison.

Because she and other members of her team were told as such?

I'm trying my best to be polite here, but the fact that your first reaction on a feminist board of all places, was to heap blame on a woman and victim of horrific racial abuse, really does say a lot.

There's also nothing to suggest that the paedophile received anything less than the best professional care from Ms Melle or any of the other medical staff. Using correct sex language, especially in a medical setting isn't unprofessional:

Jennifer, who had worked her way up to become a senior nurse, had been told along with her colleagues that Mr X had been brought in for treatment from a men’s prison and was a sex offender.

He entered the hospital chained to two guards and was clearly masculine in appearance, standing over six feet tall and of large build.

At 10pm, a junior colleague approached Miss Melle in a distressed state saying that Mr X wanted to self-discharge. He was shouting and upsetting other elderly and vulnerable patients on the ward.

The doctor had been called for guidance on the discharge but had not yet responded. As the senior nurse on the ward, Jennifer followed her colleague to take charge of the situation and to provide support.

Looking at the patient’s medical records, she saw that the patient was recorded as male, not female or ‘transgender’. On the name board next to the bed, it simply gave the feminine name.

With her colleague finally getting through to the doctor on the phone, Jennifer requested to speak to him. She said to the doctor that: ‘Mr X would like to self-discharge.’
Overhearing the call, enraged Mr X screamed: “Do not call me Mr! I am a woman!”

Still on the phone to the doctor, Jennifer called back to Mr X that she was speaking to the doctor and was working out what medication could be given before he was discharged.

https://christianconcern.com/news/jennifer-melle-wins-settlement-from-nhs-after-10-month-long-legal-battle/

Jennifer Melle wins settlement from NHS after 10-month-long legal battle - Christian Concern

Christian nurse wins settlement from NHS after being labelled a ‘risk’ for declining to use paedophile’s preferred gender identity

https://christianconcern.com/news/jennifer-melle-wins-settlement-from-nhs-after-10-month-long-legal-battle/

solerolover · 13/04/2026 15:05

‘Imagine if I called you n, Mr X yelled. ‘How about I call you n? Yes, black n!’

Jennifer said if he carried on, she would have to call security.

Mr X then lunged threateningly towards Jennifer and pursued her out of the room until he was eventually held back by the guards.

But she provoked him, I'm so sorry, "her" right? 🙃

Datun · 13/04/2026 15:07

solerolover · 13/04/2026 15:03

How did she know this person was a convicted peadophile at the time? I can only see that the person arrived from the sex offender wing of a male prison.

Because she and other members of her team were told as such?

I'm trying my best to be polite here, but the fact that your first reaction on a feminist board of all places, was to heap blame on a woman and victim of horrific racial abuse, really does say a lot.

There's also nothing to suggest that the paedophile received anything less than the best professional care from Ms Melle or any of the other medical staff. Using correct sex language, especially in a medical setting isn't unprofessional:

Jennifer, who had worked her way up to become a senior nurse, had been told along with her colleagues that Mr X had been brought in for treatment from a men’s prison and was a sex offender.

He entered the hospital chained to two guards and was clearly masculine in appearance, standing over six feet tall and of large build.

At 10pm, a junior colleague approached Miss Melle in a distressed state saying that Mr X wanted to self-discharge. He was shouting and upsetting other elderly and vulnerable patients on the ward.

The doctor had been called for guidance on the discharge but had not yet responded. As the senior nurse on the ward, Jennifer followed her colleague to take charge of the situation and to provide support.

Looking at the patient’s medical records, she saw that the patient was recorded as male, not female or ‘transgender’. On the name board next to the bed, it simply gave the feminine name.

With her colleague finally getting through to the doctor on the phone, Jennifer requested to speak to him. She said to the doctor that: ‘Mr X would like to self-discharge.’
Overhearing the call, enraged Mr X screamed: “Do not call me Mr! I am a woman!”

Still on the phone to the doctor, Jennifer called back to Mr X that she was speaking to the doctor and was working out what medication could be given before he was discharged.

https://christianconcern.com/news/jennifer-melle-wins-settlement-from-nhs-after-10-month-long-legal-battle/

Completely normal, totally professional, in fact cool under the most extreme circumstances.

And yes, who the hell tries to defend this?

It seems the bat signal has really gone up on FWR lately.

As PP have said, it's like it's 2015.

Well it fucking isn't.

loislovesstewie · 13/04/2026 15:11

AlwaysNuance · 13/04/2026 14:02

Yeah, nah.

The sex of a person may indeed be of paramount importance in certain medical situations. There are ways and ways of saying that in situations where it is important. One could say "the patient in cubicle 5 who is a trans woman, born male" or "Susan Jones, who is transgender". You don't have to say "Mr Jones".
She could even have said "Susan Jones, who was previously male". None of those are disrespectful.

Having read the times article above it's clear that she wasn't asking about what specific treatment was needed for a male bodied person. She was reporting that the patient wanted to leave. She could have said "Susan Jones in cubicle 5 is asking to self-discharge".

'Susan Jones' is always male having been born with XY chromosomes.

tobee · 13/04/2026 15:11

When will it be that NHS trusts across the board will stop with this ridiculous agenda and healthcare professionals will not be sanctioned for stating biological fact or being respected and have single sex changing spaces? And the rest!

GailBlancheViola · 13/04/2026 15:12

If this person had been an "ordinary" trans person and NOT a violent and revolting sex offender, would it have been more or less ok to call them "Mr Jones" ?

Perfectly acceptable to refer to a male person using a male pronoun when talking about them.

GailBlancheViola · 13/04/2026 15:20

Still on the phone to the doctor, Jennifer called back to Mr X that she was speaking to the doctor and was working out what medication could be given before he was discharged.

Critical for the doctor to know the sex of the patient regarding medication prior to discharge or would you rather @AlwaysNuance the patient was given incorrect medication/dosage by the nurse failing to give the correct details of the persons sex? You would be happy for the consequences of that? Presumably you would as long as it wasn't you facing those consequences and all that would be okay with you because at least the person wasn't referred to by the correct pronoun for their sex.

FranticFrankie · 13/04/2026 15:21

"Previously male" ??? Still is, alwaysnuance

I have a feeling that however Jennifer had referred to this man, even using the terms alwaysnuance has suggested, would not have been good enough. Nothing except total capitulation is enough.
It was a disgusting, racist attack on a woman trying to do her job, and is inexcusable.
It sounds like she had no support from her trust or her union either.

I didn't know that a white doctor had used 'Mr' - that's interesting isn't it?
The comment from the Trust is but but...disgraceful.
How much longer is the cash strapped NHS going to carry on defending cases like this? It needs stopping.

Anyway congratulations to Jennifer 🌷
And sorry to hear that @Gettingbysomehow How awful for you 🌷

testmatchspecial · 13/04/2026 15:35

Tallisker · 13/04/2026 14:25

“Private medical information” - your sex is not private medical information.

Exactly. Everyone who comes into contact with him can see this “private medical information”.

ERthree · 13/04/2026 15:38

AlwaysNuance · 13/04/2026 13:32

The trans person was racially abusive, but only AFTER being referred to as "Mr". That doesn't excuse it. But it was inflammatory behaviour from the nurse in my view. She could have simply said "the patient in cubicle 5" or "Susan Jones". She didn't have to say "Mr Jones".

I agree with the trust that neither racial abuse nor breaching patient confidentiality is ok.

He is a Mr, he is a bloke, a male.

lcakethereforeIam · 13/04/2026 15:40

Just read this. So pleased for Jennifer. I hope the rest of this process is soon behind her. Disgraceful it happened at all and that it's taking so long.

WearyAuldWumman · 13/04/2026 15:42

Had a phone call from Ipso Mori about voting, etc.

One question was about ‘local concerns’.

I live only a few miles from Kirkcaldy Vic, so I raised the Sandie Peggie case and the failure of certain politicians to take safeguarding seriously.

ginasevern · 13/04/2026 15:45

@AlwaysNuance

"Yeah, nah.
The sex of a person may indeed be of paramount importance in certain medical situations. There are ways and ways of saying that in situations where it is important. One could say "the patient in cubicle 5 who is a trans woman, born male" or "Susan Jones, who is transgender". You don't have to say "Mr Jones"."

So the black nurse who was racially abused by a violent, convicted 6ft bearded paedophile with a penis deserved all she fucking got. Right? And the NHS was right to spaff half a milion pounds trying to destroy her. Right again?

BusyAzureTraybake · 13/04/2026 15:46

It would be completely unprofessional and bordering on negligence for a nurse to mis-sex a patient. He is, was and always will be male. Apparently he has a 'feminine' name so even more reason for the nurse to say 'mister' over the phone. She made it absolutely clear to the patient that she would use his preferred name, but would not use pronouns to lie.

We are done with compelled speech @AlwaysNuance

CassOle · 13/04/2026 15:48

GailBlancheViola · 13/04/2026 15:12

If this person had been an "ordinary" trans person and NOT a violent and revolting sex offender, would it have been more or less ok to call them "Mr Jones" ?

Perfectly acceptable to refer to a male person using a male pronoun when talking about them.

I agree.

This whole idea of 'preferred pronouns' needs to go in the bin.

MrsOvertonsWindow · 13/04/2026 15:51

His racist and abusive reaction to her is likely a reflection of the extreme trans capture of the prison service? The service where civil servants and senior staff in the MoJ / Home Office have got very excited about placing men in women's prisons and devising policies where the even the most extreme paedophiles / sex offenders get to insist on pronoun usage etc.

He'd no doubt been demanding wrong sex pronouns etc since his incarceration with officers being compelled to lie for fear of losing their jobs.

Coming up against the medical reality of his sex was evidently a shock with Jennifer being becoming his victim, as well as being the victim of her also captured employers.

JulietteHasAGun · 13/04/2026 15:52

Apparently she is still facing an NMC hearing. Be interesting to see what they make of it. They can strike people off for the arbitrary offence of “being unprofessional “. Bringing the profession into disrepute, etc.

which sometimes seems to translate as “not being kind”

not sure how captured they are

PachacutisBadAuntie · 13/04/2026 15:52
groucho marx GIF

Congratulations to Jennifer, I hope she's found a better employer already.

Did you misspell your username @AlwaysNuance ?

RoyalCorgi · 13/04/2026 15:54

GailBlancheViola · 13/04/2026 15:12

If this person had been an "ordinary" trans person and NOT a violent and revolting sex offender, would it have been more or less ok to call them "Mr Jones" ?

Perfectly acceptable to refer to a male person using a male pronoun when talking about them.

Absolutely it is. I think that's true whoever the patient is or whoever the medical staff member is.

However, an added element of interest in this case is that Jennifer Melle is a Christian and felt that to pretend that a man is a woman came into conflict with her Christian beliefs. Given that Christianity is a protected belief under the Equality Act, this could have made for a very interesting discussion if it had gone to court.

OP posts:
Soontobe60 · 13/04/2026 15:57

AlwaysNuance · 13/04/2026 13:32

The trans person was racially abusive, but only AFTER being referred to as "Mr". That doesn't excuse it. But it was inflammatory behaviour from the nurse in my view. She could have simply said "the patient in cubicle 5" or "Susan Jones". She didn't have to say "Mr Jones".

I agree with the trust that neither racial abuse nor breaching patient confidentiality is ok.

She was speaking on the phone to a doctor about the patient. The issue was a sex dependent one. Using ‘he’ was the appropriate thing for her to do.

BusyAzureTraybake · 13/04/2026 16:00

Perhaps the hospital could put its efforts into addressing the fact that its maternity service is rated 'requires improvement'.
Thirty years ago I knew a couple of GPs who would try to avoid sending their pregnant women there for maternity care. Looks like not much has changed.