Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Daughter in early 20s lonely due to GC views

1000 replies

Currentquandry · 05/04/2026 02:10

My daughter is in her early twenties. She is GC and is struggling because so few of her peers have similar opinions. She is very lonely because of this. Are there any online groups she could join to give her a sense of community? She is also ND. Thank you in advance for your advice…

OP posts:
Thread gallery
13
AidaP · 05/04/2026 20:59

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

ScaryFaces · 05/04/2026 21:02

GlovedhandsCecilia · 05/04/2026 20:48

It's interesting because that's something Black women often associate with White Feminism. Any time a Black woman would offer a challenging perspective or opinion, the unfamiliarity with the Black experience and the assumption that white women's experiences are universal would lead them to assume that the Black woman is male.

Cynically, I do think it was sometimes used to deny the femininity of Black women in a racist way, as in, they know it is a Black woman but rely on racist stereotypes of Black women as masculine as an attempt at a rebuttal.

But this has taught me that "you are an imposter" is just a general ploy used to try and discredit an opposing view by anyone who would otherwise be in a position to have a say on the matter.

"Don't listen to those "women" who disgree with us, they are probably men".

Edited

Yep. And it's very notable that even when the people who disagree with them are undeniably women - such as the majority of swimmers at Hampstead Women's pond who voted to keep the ponds trans-inclusive - the GC movement still thinks it has a right to override them. Presumably they think the poor dears just don't know their own minds and need someone else to make decisions for them, It's very paternalist and very difficult to square with any claims to be a genuine feminist movement.

IggyPopsPlasticTrousers · 05/04/2026 21:03

Helleofabore · 05/04/2026 20:42

"And yes, I do think both sides have an ideology, that is blinding them to potential compromises or ways to move forward."

And yet, you won't explain what those compromises are when directly asked.

I think we can only surmise after you have ignored questions for about the third time as to what would be the solution for prisons and sport, that you actually don't know what those 'compromises' could be. Instead, just like the lazy 'both sides', you seem to now be just repeating an empty claim of 'compromises'.

While telling women who are saying that we have been offering 'compromises' for at least a decade now that they are the problem and that they are 'ideological'. At this stage, you telling women that they are 'ideological' seems very much like rank hypocrisy.

I will ask again though because I do actually want to know your thoughts.

Where should a male prisoner with a transgender identity be housed in prison?

Do you believe that the IOC has made an error with the current change in policy? What compromise do you think the IOC should be making for male athletes with a transgender identity?

Ok - last time for me on this thread...

I think it would be useful to have a specific prison for trans inmates. Two wings - one for trans men, one for trans women.

And I do agree that trans women shouldn't compete with biological / natal women in elite sport. I think they have an unfair advantage.

alliumursinum · 05/04/2026 21:05

@ScaryFaces rite not right - definitions matter

EvieBB · 05/04/2026 21:06

SugarPuffSandwiches · 05/04/2026 19:07

You're going to get lots of different answers and interpretations to that one depending on who's answering 😁
Gender critical basically what it says - people who are "critical of gender."
As in, don't believe in gender, and say it's a made up construct.
Usually conflating sex with gender and not realising or understanding that they're two totally different things.

Ah...get ya...thank you :)

SternJoyousBeev2 · 05/04/2026 21:07

ScaryFaces · 05/04/2026 20:38

Helen Joyce of Sex Matters called every trans person who exists "a huge problem for a sane world" and said "the fewer of those people there are, the better."

It's clear from a couple of comments on this thread now that while GCs may not wish individuals out of existence, they most certainly wish they weren't trans, which feels akin to the anti-gay "hate the sin, love the sinner" nonsense, which didn't really convince anyone either.

I’m not Helen Joyce though so….

The ideology is absolutely damaging to a sane society. But what adults choose to do to themselves is their business as long as it doesn’t impose any demands on everyone else. Understand?

And it’s absolutely nothing like people who are anti-gay considering that GI is homo and lesbo phobic.

alliumursinum · 05/04/2026 21:09

@IggyPopsPlasticTrousers What is the cost to the public purse of constructing a new prison for trans prisoners? Is this something you'd recommend a party campaigns on? My first question is, what are we cutting to build a trans-prison?

SternJoyousBeev2 · 05/04/2026 21:10

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Helleofabore · 05/04/2026 21:10

Here's the full conversation: "Wine with Women ep. 4: Helen Joyce" m.youtube.com/watch?v=8_u1MQFjxvI

She is discussing women losing medal, children being sterilised on puberty blockers and cross sex hormones, and where women and girls were being shamed and coerced into saying they believe that a man with a beard is a woman.

"We can't win this by saying you know there's 60 x million people in this country and we've got to persuade all of them or a great majority of them. We've got to get through to the decision makers and in the meantime while we're trying to get through to the decision makers we have to try to limit the harm. And that means reducing or keeping down the number of people who transition and that's for two reasons. One of them is that every one of those people is a person who's been damaged."

"But the second one is every one of those people is basically, you know, a huge problem to a sane world. Like if you've got people that and whether they're transitioned whether they're happily transitioned, whether they're unhappily transitioned, whether they're de-transitioned. If you've got people who've dissociated from their sex in some way, every one of those people is someone who needs special accommodation."

"In a sane world where we re-acknowledge the the truth of sex and I mean the people who've been damaged by it. The children have been put through this. Those people deserve every accommodation we can possibly make but every one of them is a difficulty, yes. And I mean I know that sounds heartless..I'm trying to say exactly the opposite of sounding heartless. I'm saying every one of those people for 50, 60, 70 years is going to need things that the rest of us just don't need, because the rest of us are just our sex."

Since this video, the UK government has actually listened to the women she refers to who wrote to their MPs about puberty blockers, we had the Cass review and puberty blockers are still not being prescribed on the NHS for gender identity. We have also had several court cases where it has been established that women no longer have to refer to their abusers as 'women' and use female language for them.

We have also had governments who said that female prisoners should not be sharing female prisons with male prisoners because those male prisoners say they are female.

We have also just had the IOC publish a new policy that should mean that no more female athletes are losing their sporting opportunities.

What do you believe she was referring to back in 2022? Maybe rather than demanding that 'I' produce the transcript, maybe you could explain just what she said. I mean, I also believe that she has clarified since that she did not say this because she believed that people with transgender identities should not exist.

- YouTube

Enjoy the videos and music that you love, upload original content and share it all with friends, family and the world on YouTube.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=8_u1MQFjxvI

SugarPuffSandwiches · 05/04/2026 21:16

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

"Our ploppers"
Also known as people on the thread, ordinary posters, just not automatically going along with every single thing said.
We're back to the "othering" , the desperate attempts of trying to tar everyone the same again" part of the script, aren't we 😜

ArabellaScott · 05/04/2026 21:17

IggyPopsPlasticTrousers · 05/04/2026 21:03

Ok - last time for me on this thread...

I think it would be useful to have a specific prison for trans inmates. Two wings - one for trans men, one for trans women.

And I do agree that trans women shouldn't compete with biological / natal women in elite sport. I think they have an unfair advantage.

Sensible propositions. Transwomen are already housed in the sex offenders wing in Edinburgh in Scotland.

Helleofabore · 05/04/2026 21:17

IggyPopsPlasticTrousers · 05/04/2026 21:03

Ok - last time for me on this thread...

I think it would be useful to have a specific prison for trans inmates. Two wings - one for trans men, one for trans women.

And I do agree that trans women shouldn't compete with biological / natal women in elite sport. I think they have an unfair advantage.

Wonderful.

"I think it would be useful to have a specific prison for trans inmates. Two wings - one for trans men, one for trans women."

This was suggested by feminist many years ago. A specific wing was also built, at Downview Prison. It was rejected at one time by those male people. I think they have lost that campaign and it is now being used for purpose.

However, women here were suggesting this very thing before that wing was built.

"And I do agree that trans women shouldn't compete with biological / natal women in elite sport. I think they have an unfair advantage."

And again... you and many others on this board agree!

So, please tell us more about those 'compromises' that extreme women simply haven't suggested and that is why feminists saying that single sex provisions should remain single sex are just like the men who abuse us and threaten rape? Which is what you have effectively argued with your 'both sides' argument.

Please now answer:

Do you believe that female people should have refuges, shelters and rape crisis support and care that is female only? If not, what compromises should female people be making?

Do you believe that female people should have to undress in a communal changing room with a male person?

SugarPuffSandwiches · 05/04/2026 21:18

Not seen lots of deletions on this thread and I've read it all, unless they've only just started up

ScaryFaces · 05/04/2026 21:18

Helleofabore · 05/04/2026 21:10

Here's the full conversation: "Wine with Women ep. 4: Helen Joyce" m.youtube.com/watch?v=8_u1MQFjxvI

She is discussing women losing medal, children being sterilised on puberty blockers and cross sex hormones, and where women and girls were being shamed and coerced into saying they believe that a man with a beard is a woman.

"We can't win this by saying you know there's 60 x million people in this country and we've got to persuade all of them or a great majority of them. We've got to get through to the decision makers and in the meantime while we're trying to get through to the decision makers we have to try to limit the harm. And that means reducing or keeping down the number of people who transition and that's for two reasons. One of them is that every one of those people is a person who's been damaged."

"But the second one is every one of those people is basically, you know, a huge problem to a sane world. Like if you've got people that and whether they're transitioned whether they're happily transitioned, whether they're unhappily transitioned, whether they're de-transitioned. If you've got people who've dissociated from their sex in some way, every one of those people is someone who needs special accommodation."

"In a sane world where we re-acknowledge the the truth of sex and I mean the people who've been damaged by it. The children have been put through this. Those people deserve every accommodation we can possibly make but every one of them is a difficulty, yes. And I mean I know that sounds heartless..I'm trying to say exactly the opposite of sounding heartless. I'm saying every one of those people for 50, 60, 70 years is going to need things that the rest of us just don't need, because the rest of us are just our sex."

Since this video, the UK government has actually listened to the women she refers to who wrote to their MPs about puberty blockers, we had the Cass review and puberty blockers are still not being prescribed on the NHS for gender identity. We have also had several court cases where it has been established that women no longer have to refer to their abusers as 'women' and use female language for them.

We have also had governments who said that female prisoners should not be sharing female prisons with male prisoners because those male prisoners say they are female.

We have also just had the IOC publish a new policy that should mean that no more female athletes are losing their sporting opportunities.

What do you believe she was referring to back in 2022? Maybe rather than demanding that 'I' produce the transcript, maybe you could explain just what she said. I mean, I also believe that she has clarified since that she did not say this because she believed that people with transgender identities should not exist.

Thank you for sharing that. As the full quote shows, Helen Joyce most certainly did say and most certainly did mean exactly what I said she did. Btw, you've missed off the final sentence, where she added "So the fewer of these people there are, the better." Not sure why you're asking me to explain what she said, since it's perfectly clear in her own words.

ArabellaScott · 05/04/2026 21:20

ScaryFaces · 05/04/2026 21:02

Yep. And it's very notable that even when the people who disagree with them are undeniably women - such as the majority of swimmers at Hampstead Women's pond who voted to keep the ponds trans-inclusive - the GC movement still thinks it has a right to override them. Presumably they think the poor dears just don't know their own minds and need someone else to make decisions for them, It's very paternalist and very difficult to square with any claims to be a genuine feminist movement.

If some women cannot use a mixed sex space, then making a female space mixed sex excludes them.

Either [some] males are excluded or [some] females are.

I choose. to support the women in that scenario.

Helleofabore · 05/04/2026 21:21

IggyPopsPlasticTrousers · 05/04/2026 21:03

Ok - last time for me on this thread...

I think it would be useful to have a specific prison for trans inmates. Two wings - one for trans men, one for trans women.

And I do agree that trans women shouldn't compete with biological / natal women in elite sport. I think they have an unfair advantage.

Thank you again for answering.

Do you realise that the current Green's leadership reject these very things that you support?

And do you realise now that you actually agree with the majority of the UK population on those issues, just like the Polling data that I posted for you to read suggests?

You claimed to support the progressive beliefs of that young generation, yet, your own opinions align on these issues with the majority opinion of this board. Yet you have positioned yourself as the reasonable person and others as being 'extreme'.

Wearenotborg · 05/04/2026 21:21

AidaP · 05/04/2026 18:05

Not to mention that most of those questions are not set in neutral way, plus it's in era where for few years now, there are 10+ anti-trans pieces in press and tv every week.

And still that's the best of polling they can cook, and then be surprised where it doesn't relate to how things are IRL.

You can cook the books as much as you want, reality is that you lost still have to keep to hiding, and will continue to do so.

Edited

Have you been in the wine again mate? Maybe it’s not so much “anti trans” pieces, but people becoming more aware of trans allies posting things like “women should be raped with a splintery rolling pin” if they don’t allow men into female spaces. That’s not the way to win hearts and minds. I mean, I could compare it to fascists or Nazis but that’s been so over done.

ScaryFaces · 05/04/2026 21:23

ArabellaScott · 05/04/2026 21:20

If some women cannot use a mixed sex space, then making a female space mixed sex excludes them.

Either [some] males are excluded or [some] females are.

I choose. to support the women in that scenario.

The women don't want your support, they have voted overwhelmingly for you to leave them alone and let them get on with swimming. I have friends who swim at the ponds, they are absolutely infuriated that people who have never dipped a toe in the water and never intend to think they can legally dictate who gets included in the space. It is paternalistic and patronising and shows no regard for a space that women value and use.

AidaP · 05/04/2026 21:23

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

SternJoyousBeev2 · 05/04/2026 21:24

ScaryFaces · 05/04/2026 21:02

Yep. And it's very notable that even when the people who disagree with them are undeniably women - such as the majority of swimmers at Hampstead Women's pond who voted to keep the ponds trans-inclusive - the GC movement still thinks it has a right to override them. Presumably they think the poor dears just don't know their own minds and need someone else to make decisions for them, It's very paternalist and very difficult to square with any claims to be a genuine feminist movement.

We have no idea how many women who use Hampstead Women’s Pond responded to the consultation nor how they responded. We only know the total number of respondents and their % responses. They were not all from women who use the ponds. They were definitely not all from people who use the Ponds.

Helleofabore · 05/04/2026 21:24

ScaryFaces · 05/04/2026 21:18

Thank you for sharing that. As the full quote shows, Helen Joyce most certainly did say and most certainly did mean exactly what I said she did. Btw, you've missed off the final sentence, where she added "So the fewer of these people there are, the better." Not sure why you're asking me to explain what she said, since it's perfectly clear in her own words.

Because you seem to have taken a very bad faith interpretation of her words.

I disagree that they said what you have tried to imply.

"So the fewer of these people there are, the better." And again, she was referring to children here I believe. Because prior to this she and Helen were discussing social transitioning.

And adding this: she also clearly states it here:

"In a sane world where we re-acknowledge the the truth of sex and I mean the people who've been damaged by it. The children have been put through this.

Do you believe that children should be put on puberty blockers and cross sex hormones?

Waitwhat23 · 05/04/2026 21:27

ScaryFaces · 05/04/2026 21:02

Yep. And it's very notable that even when the people who disagree with them are undeniably women - such as the majority of swimmers at Hampstead Women's pond who voted to keep the ponds trans-inclusive - the GC movement still thinks it has a right to override them. Presumably they think the poor dears just don't know their own minds and need someone else to make decisions for them, It's very paternalist and very difficult to square with any claims to be a genuine feminist movement.

The EQA 2010 states that if a service is designated and advertised for a specific sex, then it has to be for that sex and not mixed sex.

It's UK law which service providers are legally obliged to follow. You must see the issues if service providers refuse to follow the EQA2010, surely?

Service providers like the Ponds can have a tantrum if they want to but they must follow the law regardless.

RufustheFactualReindeer · 05/04/2026 21:28

EvieBB · 05/04/2026 21:06

Ah...get ya...thank you :)

Gender critical means critical of gender stereotypes….its a social construct and changes over time and countries

its been twisted now and the meaning changes from person to person

son in law thought it meant that someone GC liked gender stereotypes 😒

Waitwhat23 · 05/04/2026 21:29

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Oh dude. Given your rapey threats, I'd maybe sit down if I were you.

ScaryFaces · 05/04/2026 21:29

SternJoyousBeev2 · 05/04/2026 21:24

We have no idea how many women who use Hampstead Women’s Pond responded to the consultation nor how they responded. We only know the total number of respondents and their % responses. They were not all from women who use the ponds. They were definitely not all from people who use the Ponds.

Edited

I'm not referring to the consultation, I'm referring to the member's association vote: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-6849484

Kenwood pond

Hampstead Heath: Trans women allowed to continue using ladies' pond

A motion proposing that "only those born female in sex" can use the Hampstead pond was rejected.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-68494843

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.