Translucent's Steph Richards to sue the labour party.

[impossibletoday]

https://x.com/i/status/2040492200266477936

🤭

Steph will have to leave crowdfund to someone in his Will at this rate.

I’m imagining his ghost haunting Mumsnet, Twitter and FILIA, like Nearly Headless Nick at Hogwarts.

Shooooow meeee the moneeeeey 👻

Don't forget, when this crowd funder started there was no organised monetary system, people were pledging beads and shiny stones they had found

Will people still be pledging Steph their stones in the year 2043?

We can drop them off in our flying cars.

Using the past performance data of £25 in 12 days and a target of £75,000, the target will be reached in just shy of 64 years.

So, yes

I almost feel like giving him a sympathy pound - does the fund accept small denominations?

I'll throw in a farthing

I was considering backing his original case because it would have been great to see it in court.

But its not longer at all clear what he plans to do with all these thousands of pounds. Or if he will swerve and pivot to another random project at any given time.

What if he decided to fund electrolysis for Orang Utans or something? Or just a holiday to Sumatra?

Won’t somebody think of the poor bald orangutans?

.

😂

https://translucent.org.uk/translucent-challenges-the-ehrcs-code-of-practice/

Just popping this on the thread as out of all the countries in the whole world, Translucent have issued a "travel advisory" for..... the UK 😂

translucent.org.uk/urgent-travel-advisory-issued-for-trans-and-gender-diverse-people/?amp=1

I was too busy to comment earlier when I posted it, but does this suggest he didn’t need all the money after all?

The sissy fetish is strong.

😂😂

I'm delighted to hear that men who pose as women are being told that we're no longer tolerating their cosplaying and attempts to dismantle our sex based rights in the UK. The fewer to deal with, the better.

"... the non-recognition of legal gender changes for equality purposes ..."

Translucent misrepresenting the Equality Act 2010 yet again.

Mr Richards is using the sexist union boycott of the Labour women's conference to get more attention and coverage of his attempt to undermine the Labour party for believing women are a thing:

https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5560214-sexist-unions-boycott-labour-womens-conference

I thought he'd dropped his case?

On Reddit there is a post saying that Steph told the poster this was happening before it was announced. So maybe some collusion?

Oh my gosh. Seriously!

It is not healthy to keep stoking people into a constant state of fear.
I honestly think they get addicted to the cortisol.

‘I honestly think they get addicted to the cortisol.’

As the old chestnut goes, many a truth said in jest. I think this is genuinely the case for far too many, and one of the uglier side effects of contemporary identity politics. Plus feeling ever victimised brings a certain social currency, and handily gives people a ‘get out of jail free’ card for the consequences of their own behaviour and actions.

Steph Richards is an entitled horrible man. He hasn't got a cat in hell's chance in succeeding because he isn't a woman and Labour are following the law by excluding him. Calling himself an award winning feminist is particularly galling.