Kellie-Jay Keen (AKA Posie Parker) removed from IWD event by police

[ImTooMessyButImTooClean]

https://x.com/theposieparker/status/2029940578528473283?s=46&t=p6GESSn09HWHVXYgTLIbJg

“My removal from the international women’s day event by the police.

I had been asking women’s organisations whether their services were for women only. This caused alarm and distress and the venue, claimed to be privately owned when it’s owned by the council, asked me to leave for asking questions.

I have footage of every interaction that I will upload later so you can see what those questions were and you can judge for yourself.”

Me too @TheywontletmehavethenameIwant

This is hilariously true!😂

Here is the interview with Kay

So, please @MissScarletInTheBedroom point out the hateful or incorrect things that KJK said

🎯

This thread has absolutely brightened my morning. I'm still laughing about the rug that really tied the room together.

And @MissScarletInTheBedroom if you need an analysis of the Melbourne LWS rally and who was supporting who, there are several threads with that information. I would suggest the Moira Deeming defamation case threads.

Rather than checking ‘sources’, and believing if enough people have said the same inaccurate thing then it must be correct, I recommend you investigate further.

I mean, considering you also used Jean Hatchet as a point to uphold your argument, perhaps it would have served you well to actually have updated your information since she has made statements that have changed the point you relied on.

But hey… there is no need to rely on Wikipedia when there are people posting the misinformation from Wikipedia all over the internet. However, it could be of interest to track back just what was said and who said it and whether they used Wikipedia. And whether AI has just regurgitated wiki and those sources. And also check the ‘feminist’ sources too. I mean, I assume the sin page is still up and available on one feminist group’s page that also regurgitated the Wikipedia page information.

Any woman who accepts or supports the misogynistic nonsense that men can be women and that women can be defined on a "case-by-case basis" is
brain-dead, brainwashed or a virtue-signalling narcissist.

I used to think that virtue-signalling was just vanity but the levels of it among primarily middle-class young women are out of control over the last ten years and I now see it as toxic femininity weaponised by misogynistic men.

The Greens are a case in point.

A charlatan cult leader surrounded by a harem of young women driven by a crazed desire to be seen to be superior to other people (usually of the home-grown working-class variety) instead of using their brains.

Virtue-signalling is just one person telling everyone else around them that he/she is morally superior to other people.

They are anything but.

They're just useful idiots and they are dragging women's rights backwards,

Whilst it is clear to us all you are tellingly swift to defend Parker - again, a woman whose consistent, factually verifiable, racism has led to real feminists and activists cuttings ties with her so as not to have our message tainted by association - your repeated, rabid, pseudo-rebuttals of opposition to her do nothing but make you look ridiculous.

I actually have no idea what this means. Someone explain it in plain English please.

Agree.
Objecting to women and girls being forced to cover their heads out of modesty is not racist. That's a slanderous term used to shut women up/close down debate.

No religion should be protected from criticism or scrutiny.
Not a single one.

Imposing "modesty" rules on women and girls is essentially blaming women and girls for men's predatory behaviour.

Society needs to focus on changing the perpetrators' behaviours not the victims.

Shame needs to change sides - everywhere.

Apparently we shouldn’t be quick to defend a woman for asking a simple question because the mean girls don’t like her and think she’s a racist. This makes us look ridiculous (according to them). Or something.

‘Actual feminists’…. Well. That is us told. Do the ‘Actual feminists’ still have their fb group? I notice the sin page is still up on one of the feminist sites. It doesn’t seem to have registered that it is not really in the feminist spirit to keep that page up. But apparently, that group is the arbiter of what is feminist or not, yet we are all still useful resources for funding when it is needed.

So… which are the ‘actual feminists’ again?

How long are we supposed to wait?

So… which are the ‘actual feminists’ again?

I don't know but I was reading an article earlier by some academic (a women of course) who's using the term Counterfeit Feminist, weirdly she seems to think it's the feminist who don't believe in counterfeit women who are the Counterfeit Feminist's Make that make sense. 🤯

Until it’s not swift?

How about now?

….or now?

To get back to the actual point of this thread and away from the visiting TRAs’ attempts at distraction (OMG this person has committed SIN and is probably not whispers a virgin) - in Nottingham single sex services break the law by admitting men and, when concerns are raised about this, the Police are called to deal with the person raising concerns.

Regardless of the moral or otherwise state of KJK that is not the way a functioning democracy or a Police force should be run. Discussion, debate and truth telling are central to a healthy society. Everyone, whatever side they take on this issue, should be calling this out.

Oh dear. Die Kinder randalieren in der Kindergarten, as we say in my classes.

It would appear that there are a number of people - largely the usual suspects, I see - who are experiencing some difficulties with facts here. Well, Tomaten auf den Augen haben...

Oh dear. Die Kinder randalieren in der Kindergarten, as we say in my classes.

Die Kinder randalieren in dem Kindergarten.
🙄

😂

Would this be “Gender Rights Activist” KJK?

FFS

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-15625953/activist-Kellie-Jay-Keen-forced-event-womens-day-police.html

I was loving the next projection that shone brightly.

Tomaten auf den Augen haben...

Oh aye.

Gosh… that journo mangled it. A ‘gender’ activist now.

She is brilliant, so articulate and so calm in the face of utter mumbling halfwits.

I wonder why none of them could debate effectively with her? That comms person particularly useless.

A woman thrown out of an event for women by police to appease men is quite the sick joke.

I'd have loved JKR to have been in the area and popped in to ask about their 'women's' services.

What exactly did she say?