Kellie-Jay Keen (AKA Posie Parker) removed from IWD event by police

[ImTooMessyButImTooClean]

https://x.com/theposieparker/status/2029940578528473283?s=46&t=p6GESSn09HWHVXYgTLIbJg

“My removal from the international women’s day event by the police.

I had been asking women’s organisations whether their services were for women only. This caused alarm and distress and the venue, claimed to be privately owned when it’s owned by the council, asked me to leave for asking questions.

I have footage of every interaction that I will upload later so you can see what those questions were and you can judge for yourself.”

Why are we still arguing about this nonsense men are men - the law says so women say so we need to move on there are bigger fish to fry the 51% have got this one!

This is a good reminder for me.

https://x.com/thearbourist/status/2034625446784958710?s=46

“When one group’s ‘rights’ require another group to surrender privacy, fairness, or conscience, the conflict is no longer about equality. It is about power.”

”The smartest move activists made was rhetorical: they stopped arguing for contested demands and started calling them “rights.” After that, dissent could be recoded as cruelty, and ordinary objections could be treated as moral failure.”

“Female spaces were not built out of bigotry. They were built because sex differences are real, and privacy, safety, and fairness matter. Calling those boundaries hateful does not refute them. It just bullies people into silence.”

“A demand for equality says: leave me free. A demand for compliance says: you must affirm, yield, and rearrange your world around me. Too much of this debate is presented as the first when it is plainly the second.”

I don't think Wahey's mate says 'loads' as per transcript. He's asked 'do you go into women's spaces?' and he replies 'I use womens loos'.

I thought so too at first but Edge of Matrix guy replies, "You use women's loads. Right."

Even though Edge of Matrix guy was right there so I should not have reason to doubt him, I also listened to the video several times turning up the volume each time. It was only when it was much louder that I could hear that he was saying, "loads" not "loos".

The YouTube automatic transcript, screenshot by Shedmistress · 22 March 2026 08:39, analysed his speech as "loads" because it is probably more reliable than the ear and brain of a human who is attending to the YT audio filtered through speakers plus it is also unhampered by a heavy weight of prediction based on context.

Phonemic transcription:
Big Red Bloke says /'ləʊz/ instead of /'ləʊdz/

• He misses out the /d/ sound

Effect of listener prediction:
What we are likely to predict him saying in this context is "loos" /'lu:z/

In combination:
Imprecise pronunciation + Prediction = on first listening it is very easy to hear /'lu:z/ ("loos") instead of "loads".

(Trust me, I was a Speech & Language Therapist, was trained to do this sort of thing and did it for a living 🙏)

It's not a matter of respect to use someone's "preferred pronouns".

Preferred pronouns = coercive control

Preferred pronouns only exist inside the head of a controlling narcissist.
When people are face to face we all use the first or second person singular - "I" or "you". We only use the 3rd person singular or plural when someone is not present or we are relating something a third party did or said.
The only people who want to control what pronouns someone else uses in their absence /when referring to them are self-absorbed narcissists, usually of the male variety.

He is a bloke in a hoodie.

M'Lady, ladies and gentleman of the Jury, I would draw your attention to Exhibit A, the "hoodie" in question.

Please observe the delicate, feminine appearance of the arms of said "hoodie", embroidered, or perhaps appliquéd, with garlands of an incontrovertibly womanly, floral decoration.

Thus we can deduce that the alleged "bloke in a hoodie" is in fact demonstrating possession of a perfectly exquisite female gender identity!

How cruel, how viciously defamatory and perhaps bitterly envious, to suggest for one moment that this beautiful, fragile soul, "does not have a female gender identity anyway even if that as a concept existed."

(Takes onion from trouser pocket and sobs into cambric handkerchief.)

This

preferred pronouns = coercive control

Use whatever pronouns you want in your own speech but hands off my free speech. I'll say what I see and what I experience thanks.

That's part of MY inner identity. Telling the truth as I see it.

Aagh! Photo got detached!

As an amateur potter, I'd assumed that he'd put his elbow in some slip before he left the basement house. Must get my eyes tested. Definitely a bird.

This.

This video from Amy Sousa seems pertinent here.

https://x.com/knownheretic/status/2035857970358272048?s=46

Particularly the comment about if one boundary has been violated by someone why should we trust that person. Just showing they are willing to violate one boundary is a sign we shouldn’t trust that person.

I consider this starts at language as an initial boundary violation.

Absolutely perfectly put.