There is zero evidence she supports nazis or neo-nazis. That nazis gatecrashed the womens event (they gatecrash EVERY fucking thing here in Australia) doesn't prove anything, you are using Guilt By Association. If the KKK gatecrashed a NAACP event, would that make the NAACP racist?
And many GC feminists write in the Spectator because it is one of the rare outlets we have. What else are we supposed to do, get no coverage? The Spectator might be majority right wing but it is mainstream and non-controversial.
is on friendly terms with neo-Nazi and holocaust denier Hans Jørgen Lysglimt Johansen
She didn't know he was a neo-nazi and holocaust denier at the time of the interview.
was interviewed by the far-right network Soldiers of Christ Online
And? Is she not supposed to use any method to get her message out? Must we be so politically purist all the time? I'm left wing but if I thought I could get my story out more by being interviewed by them - damn right I would!! I really don't see the issue at all.
Just so you know, far right does not equate to 'nazi supporter'.
I'm not a fan of hers in particular, but I am truly sick and tired of the nitpicking and the guilt by association attacks.