Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Dylan Mulvaney cast as Anne Boleyn

431 replies

dementedpixie · 16/01/2026 22:03

Came up on fb and thought it was satire to start with! Would put me off going to see it tbh

Dylan Mulvaney cast as Anne Boleyn
OP posts:
Thread gallery
5
terryleather · 17/01/2026 14:01

Try as I might I've never managed to get that worked up about DM - he's so obviously a do-anything-for-fame theatre gay who's found that larping full time has given him the fame and fortune that I doubt he is talented enough to have otherwise.

I'm not a fan of musical theatre anyway and would rather cut my own head off than go and see this, but I agree with the pps who say that including a man as one of the wives takes it to a whole other level of disrespect when everything that happened to those women was because of their sex.

MarieDeGournay · 17/01/2026 14:16

There is of course an incontrovertible rationale for DM portraying Anne Boleyn as there is a direct link between DM and Anne Boleyn :

-DM [in]famously appeared in ads for Nike Sportswear

-before West Ham football club moved to the London Stadium their stadium was Upton Park which was on a site known historically for the family who used to own it

-namely Boleyn Ground after Anne Boleyn's family

QED😁

ArabellaScott · 17/01/2026 14:58

Ereshkigalangcleg · 17/01/2026 11:56

You first 🤷‍♀️

You took the words right out my mouth Eresh. 😁

SidewaysOtter · 17/01/2026 15:45

Turnedturnip · 17/01/2026 13:20

Just looked this up, when did Dylan get breast implants?

I doubt he needs them, he’s already a massive tit.

Turnedturnip · 17/01/2026 15:49

SidewaysOtter · 17/01/2026 15:45

I doubt he needs them, he’s already a massive tit.

😂.

SapphireSeptember · 17/01/2026 16:00

LVhandbagsatdawn · 17/01/2026 12:45

The whole musical makes a mockery of her life.

It's not like this is a reverent, sincere, theatrical production of her life with DM thrown in.

Where was the outrage for Ann Boleyn when they've got her character singing lines about doing what her daddy tells her to, how politics isn't her thing, how she's "fitter" than CoA, and how she's going to flirt with men to make Henry "jell"?

Why is the outrage only now that DM is involved?

I've never seen it or even read the lyrics, (I've been studiously ignoring it,) but that sounds absolutely dire. Anne was fiercely intelligent and a Reformist. I feel like The Tudors did a better job if that description is anything to go by.

RoyalCorgi · 17/01/2026 16:37

LVhandbagsatdawn · 17/01/2026 12:45

The whole musical makes a mockery of her life.

It's not like this is a reverent, sincere, theatrical production of her life with DM thrown in.

Where was the outrage for Ann Boleyn when they've got her character singing lines about doing what her daddy tells her to, how politics isn't her thing, how she's "fitter" than CoA, and how she's going to flirt with men to make Henry "jell"?

Why is the outrage only now that DM is involved?

Well, maybe there wasn't any outrage because most of us haven't seen it. Musical theatre really isn't my thing, and I always thought Six sounded pretty dire, despite the popular acclaim.

I am not a fan of men taking women's roles. I didn't think much of Stephen Fry playing Lady Bracknell, which is a fantastic role for a woman, and god knows there are few good enough roles for women anyway. There are times I don't mind it too much - I think Mark Rylance's all-male Twelfth Night was an interesting idea, as was Phyllida Lloyd's all-female Julius Caesar. Let's face it, these days you can do almost anything with Shakespeare and no one cares.

But it's especially insulting to have Mulvaney play Anne Boleyn, because we are all supposed to pretend he's a woman. Mulvaney is a particularly annoying little squirt who acts out a grotesque parody of womanhood.

And, as others have pointed out, the trans activists don't like it when women play trans identifying men, but they think it's fine for trans identifying men to play women.

Ereshkigalangcleg · 17/01/2026 17:23

LVhandbagsatdawn · 17/01/2026 13:32

You can dress it up as much as you want, the fact is that everyone was apparently happy for this show to bimble on for years cheapening ABs life / story (although you can certainly make it sound more palatable by calling it "reindividualising" I suppose).

It's only now there's a trans person involved that everyone's suddenly decided it's disrespectful.

No, I always thought it sounded like a silly, vapid premise, I know my Tudor history and I can’t stand the obnoxious genderwang creators. It irritated me vaguely how much people fawn over it and them. But I do like musicals so I might have liked the tunes.

Thedevilhasfinallycaughtupwithhim · 17/01/2026 17:44

GETTINGLIKEMYMOTHER · 17/01/2026 12:12

In a local theatre we saw Richard III, the lead played by a black woman.

As you say, just why???

Were you expected to believe the black lady playing Richard III was ACTUALLY a white man though, not playing a character, a white man off the stage too?

SnoopyPajamas · 17/01/2026 18:11

Holdmeclosertinydancer2018 · 17/01/2026 13:20

I think most of us are more concerned with the lack of XX chromosomes than his vocal ability.

Agreed. But I think what you're missing here is the culture of the theatre world. There's been a real push to racebend and genderbend theatre roles in the last few years, with the reasoning being that theatre is just a more creatively free environment. Audiences are inherently more willing to suspend disbelief at a live performance, the thinking goes, and as long as the actor can act / sing their chops off, that's all that matters. So you'll get things like a female Hamlet or a racially-diverse array of American founding fathers, and at the moment, nobody bats an eye at this. And if you're unsure about it, you're the one being controversial.

This is the argument the other side will end up reverting to, when "Dylan is just as much of a woman as you!" fails to work for them. Then it'll be "well, it's theatre anyway, and in theatre -" 🙄

The reason people are bringing up Dylan Mulvaney's awful hammy acting, and total inability to sing this part the way it should be sung, is to make the point that even by the standards of the racebent, genderbent, anything-goes world of the theatre, this casting is pure shit. There really is no excuse for it.

DotAndCarryOne2 · 17/01/2026 18:53

Mistyglade · 17/01/2026 12:47

I might go just to throw mouldy veg at him.

May l suggest tomatoes - still in the tin !!

GETTINGLIKEMYMOTHER · 17/01/2026 18:54

Thedevilhasfinallycaughtupwithhim · 17/01/2026 17:44

Were you expected to believe the black lady playing Richard III was ACTUALLY a white man though, not playing a character, a white man off the stage too?

I have no idea. TBH the whole production was pretty shite. Once home I ordered a DVD of Richard III with Laurence Olivier playing the lead.

StopOnBy · 17/01/2026 19:09

Easy..
Boycott.

We have so many very good, highly trained actresses - many of whom are regularly without acting work and pay the bills via part-time side jobs - it's just how the profession works, so let's support the women in the profession.

Time to stop normalising male theft of women's hard-won progress.

Daytimetellyqueen · 17/01/2026 19:27

lurcherlover · 16/01/2026 22:09

The original AB was executed because she failed to produce a baby with a penis. The Tudors were in no doubt at all that sex was a biological concept and all six Queens were at Henry’s mercy as a result of their biology and nothing else. Women could not identify out of their oppression and no man would have wanted to adopt it. This is really disrespectful to the memories of those women.

Well said! Fucking disgusting! Hope no one goes to see it now!

Thedevilhasfinallycaughtupwithhim · 17/01/2026 19:29

GETTINGLIKEMYMOTHER · 17/01/2026 18:54

I have no idea. TBH the whole production was pretty shite. Once home I ordered a DVD of Richard III with Laurence Olivier playing the lead.

You have no idea?
Really?

SidewaysOtter · 17/01/2026 19:30

There's been a real push to racebend and genderbend theatre roles in the last few years, with the reasoning being that theatre is just a more creatively free environment.

It’s been more than a few years. I found David Copperfield (2019) really hard to watch in places not because they’d done colour-blind casting and you had, say, two black characters with a white child. It just didn’t work.

There was also Ammonite (2020), about Mary Anning. I was really looking forward to it until I realised they’d ‘queered’ her which I found hugely disrespectful.

SD1978 · 17/01/2026 21:20

Nope- no thank you. I really hope they keep this to America and let the rest of us enjoy the show the way it was initially meant to be thanks.

AndresyFiorella · 18/01/2026 07:16

StopOnBy · 17/01/2026 19:09

Easy..
Boycott.

We have so many very good, highly trained actresses - many of whom are regularly without acting work and pay the bills via part-time side jobs - it's just how the profession works, so let's support the women in the profession.

Time to stop normalising male theft of women's hard-won progress.

Especially as there are sooooo many more roles for men than women. I've lost count of the number of plays I've seen with one female character in a sea of men.

AndresyFiorella · 18/01/2026 07:27

What I find interesting (and not at all surprising) here is that the other two new cast members have won Grammies and Emmies(sp?), while Dylan has....not. The bar for the women to get a starring role on Broadway is much higher.

Dylan Mulvaney cast as Anne Boleyn
crumpet · 18/01/2026 10:18

It’s an absolute nonsense of course, but it will have some slight interest in seeing whether Mulvaney can act at all or only gurn.

DotAndCarryOne2 · 18/01/2026 10:29

crumpet · 18/01/2026 10:18

It’s an absolute nonsense of course, but it will have some slight interest in seeing whether Mulvaney can act at all or only gurn.

Agree. But what worries me is that it’s said all actors bring something of themselves to a role. I hope Mulvaney reins it in because I’d hate to see the feisty AB portrayed as a vapid, pink frocked simp, obsessed with shopping.

crumpet · 18/01/2026 10:33

DotAndCarryOne2 · 18/01/2026 10:29

Agree. But what worries me is that it’s said all actors bring something of themselves to a role. I hope Mulvaney reins it in because I’d hate to see the feisty AB portrayed as a vapid, pink frocked simp, obsessed with shopping.

I haven’t seen anything to suggest that he’d be able to avoid it!

teawamutu · 18/01/2026 10:38

DotAndCarryOne2 · 18/01/2026 10:29

Agree. But what worries me is that it’s said all actors bring something of themselves to a role. I hope Mulvaney reins it in because I’d hate to see the feisty AB portrayed as a vapid, pink frocked simp, obsessed with shopping.

That is pretty much the characterisation Six has gone for already.

Ereshkigalangcleg · 18/01/2026 13:49

AndresyFiorella · 18/01/2026 07:27

What I find interesting (and not at all surprising) here is that the other two new cast members have won Grammies and Emmies(sp?), while Dylan has....not. The bar for the women to get a starring role on Broadway is much higher.

Best known for his irritating TikTok wank account.

Ereshkigalangcleg · 18/01/2026 13:50

Or his “viral “Days of Girlhood” series, as they put it 😂