Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Sandie Peggie vs NHS Fife Health Board and Dr Beth Upton, following Employment Tribunal judgment - thread #58

1000 replies

nauticant · 11/12/2025 13:09

Judgment was handed down on 8 December 2025:
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/6936ce28a6fc97b81e57436a/S_Peggie_v_Fife_Health_Board__Dr_Upton.pdf

Sandie Peggie, a nurse at Victoria Hospital in Kirkcaldy (VH), brought claims in the employment tribunal against her employer; Fife Health Board (the Board) and another employee, Dr B Upton. Ms Peggie’s claims are of sexual harassment, harassment related to a protected belief, indirect discrimination and victimisation. Dr Upton claims to be a transwoman, that is observed as male at birth but asserting a female gender identity.

The Employment Tribunal hearing started on Monday 3 February 2025 and was expected to last 2 weeks. However, after 2 weeks it was not complete and it adjourned part-heard. It resumed on 16 July and the last day of evidence was 29 July 2025. It resumed again over 1 to 2 September for closing submissions.

The hearing was live tweeted by x.com/tribunaltweets and there's additional information here: tribunaltweets.substack.com/p/peggie-vs-fife-health-board-and-dr-005 and tribunaltweets.substack.com/p/peggie-vs-fife-health-board-and-dr-bd6.

Links to previous threads #1 to #50 can be found in this thread: mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5379717-sandie-peggie-list-of-threads-covering-employment-tribunal-and-afterwards

Thread 51: mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5402652-nhs-fife-tries-to-silence-nurse-sandie-peggie-vs-nhs-fife-health-board-and-dr-beth-upton-thread-51 1 September 2025 to 2 September 2025
Thread 52: mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5403218-nhs-fife-tries-to-silence-nurse-sandie-peggie-vs-nhs-fife-health-board-and-dr-beth-upton-thread-52 2 September 2025 to 4 September 2025
Thread 53: mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5404208-nhs-fife-tries-to-silence-nurse-sandie-peggie-vs-nhs-fife-health-board-and-dr-beth-upton-thread-53 3 September 2025 to 1 October 2025
Thread 54: mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5418690-nhs-fife-tries-to-silence-nurse-sandie-peggie-vs-nhs-fife-health-board-and-dr-beth-upton-thread-54 28 September 2025 to 21 November 2025
Thread 55: mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5447019-nhs-fife-tries-to-silence-nurse-sandie-peggie-vs-nhs-fife-health-board-and-dr-beth-upton-thread-55 19 November 2025 to 8 December 2025
Thread 56: mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5456749-nhs-fife-tries-to-silence-nurse-sandie-peggie-vs-nhs-fife-health-board-and-dr-beth-upton-thread-56 8 December 2025 to 9 December 2025
Thread 57: mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5457132-nhs-fife-tries-to-silence-nurse-sandie-peggie-vs-nhs-fife-health-board-and-dr-beth-upton-thread-57 9 December 2025 to 11 December 2025

OP posts:
Thread gallery
58
murasaki · 11/12/2025 15:55

Majorconcern · 11/12/2025 15:55

I'm wondering if the ET think they've stretched 'clerical error' to its limit in the Forstater revision, hence not changing the other bits. Even the squirrels must know there's still masses wrong with that judgment

Totally. Even trans reddit sees it, so the squirrels must do.

ThatCyanCat · 11/12/2025 15:56

Chariothorses · 11/12/2025 15:53

Like a few other posters above, I too feel a bit emotional seeing this. I am one of many (the majority?) of women -with Sandie Peggie - not able to get undressed with any bloke except my husband. I am devastated the court has treated my basic human rights as a woman in the UK with such contempt- and so grudgingly. How dare they tell us we have to get undressed in front of men just to access work? ..And my anger at a government that is failing to address this cruelty to women is growing too.

I also feel a bit tearful as I am so grateful to Sandie for doing this- the stress (and distress) being caused to her is immense. And she will never know that so many invisible, ordinary, women, like me, who she will never meet, are forever in her debt.

I think she might.... she received scores of cards via Sex Matters/FWS. A fundraiser was started for Upton to give him some support through his terrible ordeal; from memory it raised around £3k, and many of the donation were £1, left purely so the giver could leave a message telling him what they thought of him (I think that's why it closed). An equivalent was set up for Sandie and raised about ten times as much. She donated it all to charity.

Beerlzebub · 11/12/2025 15:57

ArabellaSaurus · 11/12/2025 15:37

Yep. She was just trying to do her job, while dealing with all the usual shite that women have to deal with - menopausal struggles, family illness, plus the stress of frontline work, and her employer has to spaff our tax money on paying idiots like Isla 'don't know if I'm a woman' Bumba to give a fanny like the supercilious Dr Upton carte blanche to hang out in her changing room, then offer him every benefit of the doubt when his obviously upsetting presence causes yet more stress for a woman. He made up bullshit to try and get her sacked. He mocked all women with his 'big girl panties' schtick. He loved trotting out his bullshit philosophy tube nonsense to an eager audience, and that wee nyaff of a judge lapped it all up and thought that nice Dr Upton who went to a nice school, a good uni, and has a good family must be the good guy here. Sandie - just a disposable wee wumman of no consequence. Not even worthy of writing a clear judgement, instead he just cobbles together an incoherent character assassination in lieu of an actual judgement.

Potter retires in the nick of time. NHS Fife admit at last that Peggie was right all along, now that the big bloke at the Supreme Court put his foot down.

Because they won't listen to women, especially not women who aren't the right nice good type of women. Because THOSE women don't deserve rights, and those rights are bigoted to even want anyway, so any woman who asks for them reveals herself to be not worthy by the act of asking. (If she sinks, she's innocent.)

Shame on the lot of them.

Very nicely put. I was forgetting the class aspect of this, aside from the misogyny.

AuntieMsDamsonCrumble · 11/12/2025 15:58

An emotional and heartwarming statement from someone who does not see herself as a natural campaigner. Well, my goodness, she is now! Among the many people Sandie named as being supportive, I was pleased to see that she stressed the support she has had from within the NHS. That rather gives the lie to the fact that no-one else is bothered about men invading women's spaces.

CriticalConditionUnamendedVersion · 11/12/2025 15:59

I also punched the air and then had a gulp at the sight of Sandie and her family standing strong with their arms around eachother.

What an amazing woman. We owe her so much.

BendoftheBeginning · 11/12/2025 15:59

ProfDrILikeDungs · 11/12/2025 15:31

That's where the language fools us though. There is no comprehension as you say. So I would argue that it does not learn. Humans know what learning is so they think that is what AI is doing. There should be other words invented for what it does because it does not learn.

Language is important. And it can manipulate your thoughts. Call me a conspiracy theorist (and a pedant).

The leap from calling LLMs “AI” has spread to nearly every other type of machine learning and even algorithms as well. Everyone and his dog is announcing their products use “AI,” despite real AI still being very much on the research drawing board.

Even my rice cooker brand - which has been using fuzzy logic for over 15 years - now calls it “AI.” It’s still fuzzy logic. The way people have been fooled into thinking LLMs have ushered in a new age of computing is absolutely crazy.

(I should insert here that I really like machine learning and think it has bags of potential - but telling people whole swathes of jobs will be replaced with LLM slop has been really irresponsible!)

MaryLennoxsScowl · 11/12/2025 16:01

MyAmpleSheep · 11/12/2025 15:55

I think it's rare to get permission refused to appeal on a point of law at least once. Beyond that, each court takes a more stringent approach to whether its limited time should be devoted to your case. There has to be a real prospect of the lower court being overturned, or a really interesting point of law that hasn't been argued before, or a matter of real significance to the whole of the UK to get to the Supreme Court.

Thank you!

Beerlzebub · 11/12/2025 16:04

ProfessorBinturong · 11/12/2025 15:45

I rather hope the rest aren't addressed. Ben Cooper systematically taking them apart, line by line, will be the spectacle of 2026.

I don't think they can be addressed. Unless they try and dress them up as "clerical errors", or whatever other fluff they're actually allowed to change.

I'm surprised today's change got through.

123ZYX · 11/12/2025 16:07

I’m not going to be able to watch the press conference today. Could someone please clarify how the legal team will now work? Is Naomi Cunningham or Charlotte Elves stepping out of it for the hearing (assuming it is heard by the EAT) or will all three be there?

ickky · 11/12/2025 16:07

Majorconcern · 11/12/2025 15:55

Oh, she wouldn't take Ben on, would she?

JR was junior counsel on the Allison Baily case with BC opposing.

I think she made a bit of a tit of herself in that one too.

ArabellaSaurus · 11/12/2025 16:07

The class aspect is written in ten feet high neon letters, imo.

The Lanyards get nice things for nice people. Their desires are about living their real, true, precious inner selves, with the big words and the deep and righteous thoughts. They know the Right Side of HIstory, because they're the ones that write it.

The 'bum wipers' must learn to do as they're told and stay in their place Their desires are common and a bit simple and naff, and prudish and unprogressive. They read the wrong papers, make jokes that are crass, and are not very impressive victims.

On that note, I just read this on Reddit earlier:

'Since when did alleged victims of harassment and sexual misconduct hold press conferences full of tabloid journalists after losing their case?
If I were a legitimate victim of half the stuff she’s accused Upton of doing, I’d be hiding at home having a very long and thoughtful cry, not workshopping headlines with the editor of the Mail!'

It's past time these disgusting sentiments were revealed as the base misogynist, rapey, victim blaming nonsense they actually are. 'Progressive' my arse.

Boiledbeetle · 11/12/2025 16:08

Chariothorses · 11/12/2025 15:53

Like a few other posters above, I too feel a bit emotional seeing this. I am one of many (the majority?) of women -with Sandie Peggie - not able to get undressed with any bloke except my husband. I am devastated the court has treated my basic human rights as a woman in the UK with such contempt- and so grudgingly. How dare they tell us we have to get undressed in front of men just to access work? ..And my anger at a government that is failing to address this cruelty to women is growing too.

I also feel a bit tearful as I am so grateful to Sandie for doing this- the stress (and distress) being caused to her is immense. And she will never know that so many invisible, ordinary, women, like me, who she will never meet, are forever in her debt.

Your husband line there made me remember a female relative of mine.

Even her husband had never seen her undressed.

He saw her clothed or in a nightie.

She'd have had an absolute freak out if she'd discovered a man in the changing rooms.

MarieDeGournay · 11/12/2025 16:10

I've just watched the press conference - I had a badly timed dr's appt at 3😕
and the only thing I'll add to all the words of affection and gratitude and praise for SP already expressed is this:
That is NOT a broken woman, not matter how hard they tried, no matter what they threw at her! She radiated courage and resilience and determination, and you could feel the solidarity and support around her. And more importantly, it is obvious that she feels it too.
I think she's in this for the long haul.

'They fucked with the wrong marine'Grin

murasaki · 11/12/2025 16:10

It was absolutely a class thing, amd a money thing, which in Fife's mind was related. They never considered that she'd fight back because they thought she couldn't afford it. Which she probably couldn't, but they never considered she might have support. And a lot of it.

Boiledbeetle · 11/12/2025 16:11

The gerbils are delighted.

ETA of course they'd be even more delighted if I posted them on the correct thread!!

Sandie Peggie vs NHS Fife Health Board and Dr Beth Upton, following Employment Tribunal judgment - thread #58
TheAutumnCrow · 11/12/2025 16:11

ocool · 11/12/2025 15:45

That clip on Youtube was very moving. It practically brought me to tears to see the dignity of Sandie and her family, the support of all those around her, and her willingness to carry on the battle for all our sakes.

At the same time, I was raging that it had to come to this to keep men out of our spaces. Every trick in the book, every semantic interpretation, every judgement designed to put us back in our box.

I am humbled by the grace and courage of women like Sandie to carry on the fight for all of us.

#WallOfBravery

ArabellaSaurus · 11/12/2025 16:11

murasaki · 11/12/2025 16:10

It was absolutely a class thing, amd a money thing, which in Fife's mind was related. They never considered that she'd fight back because they thought she couldn't afford it. Which she probably couldn't, but they never considered she might have support. And a lot of it.

Underestimating the rage of Scottish women may end up being a very costly mistake.

SirEctor · 11/12/2025 16:12

I for one would love an explanation of exactly how a clerical error can produce a quotation that doesn't appear anywhere else.

I can understand how a quotation could be accidentally attributed to the wrong source. I can understand how a few words may be accidentally omitted or misspelt or even somehow put in the wrong order.

I can't understand how you could accidentally present something as a quotation that isn't a quotation at all.

MyAmpleSheep · 11/12/2025 16:12

ArabellaSaurus · 11/12/2025 16:07

The class aspect is written in ten feet high neon letters, imo.

The Lanyards get nice things for nice people. Their desires are about living their real, true, precious inner selves, with the big words and the deep and righteous thoughts. They know the Right Side of HIstory, because they're the ones that write it.

The 'bum wipers' must learn to do as they're told and stay in their place Their desires are common and a bit simple and naff, and prudish and unprogressive. They read the wrong papers, make jokes that are crass, and are not very impressive victims.

On that note, I just read this on Reddit earlier:

'Since when did alleged victims of harassment and sexual misconduct hold press conferences full of tabloid journalists after losing their case?
If I were a legitimate victim of half the stuff she’s accused Upton of doing, I’d be hiding at home having a very long and thoughtful cry, not workshopping headlines with the editor of the Mail!'

It's past time these disgusting sentiments were revealed as the base misogynist, rapey, victim blaming nonsense they actually are. 'Progressive' my arse.

If I were a legitimate victim of half the stuff she’s accused Upton of doing, I’d be hiding at home having a very long and thoughtful cry, not workshopping headlines with the editor of the Mail!'

Uh huh. And after your long and thoughful cry, you put on your real "big girl"... boots ... and you go and fix things and do whatever you can to make things better for the next person to stand in your shoes. And frankly, if headilnes in the DM are part of the process, more power to SP's elbow.

You can see why they don't let us post on Reddit.

murasaki · 11/12/2025 16:12

ArabellaSaurus · 11/12/2025 16:11

Underestimating the rage of Scottish women may end up being a very costly mistake.

They weren't thinking of women at all, or we wouldn't be here, so no surprise they underestimated that!

Majorconcern · 11/12/2025 16:14

Of course, some clerics make huge errors (Archnishop of Canterbury). I can't see how you take this judgment down in court without laughing

Totallygripped · 11/12/2025 16:14

Someone on the previous thread (I think MdeG) referred to 250,000 transgender persons. From my v quick search I gathered total number of GRCs issued since introduction are around 20,000 and the 250k total figure was based on an erroneous response to the question in the last census by those with a first language other than English. I wonder what the number really is, and also division between mtf and ftm. Though from my perspective it wouldn't matter if Dr U was the only trans woman. Still wouldn't want him in my personal space.

MarieDeGournay · 11/12/2025 16:14

123ZYX · 11/12/2025 16:07

I’m not going to be able to watch the press conference today. Could someone please clarify how the legal team will now work? Is Naomi Cunningham or Charlotte Elves stepping out of it for the hearing (assuming it is heard by the EAT) or will all three be there?

I reckon they'll go with a 3-5-2 formation for most of the time, or 4-3-3 with Elves, Cooper and Cunningham in the attack, but maybe slip into a 4-2-3-1 with the boy Cooper up top...

GallantKumquat · 11/12/2025 16:14

Beerlzebub · 11/12/2025 14:31

So, that went well 😂

There's so much about this that just telegraphs pettiness. It's as though Sandy Kemp - through a combination personal offense of a woman asserting her rights and irritation about having his precious time occupied by a case he considered unworthy of his estimable self simply - threw caution to the wind and in a moment of pique hopped onto the TRA pyre that immolated Davie at the BBC and the Potter at the NHS without a second thought. What is it about the cause that compels people to make such fools of themselves? The list is very long.

mateysmum · 11/12/2025 16:15

Ben Cooper's support wren is firing up its vocal chords and practicing a few arias whilst the Mumsnet groupies hunt out their I❤Ben Cooper T shirts.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.