There is a list here: https://www.judiciary.uk/courts-and-tribunals/tribunals/employment-appeal-tribunal/about-the-employment-appeal-tribunal/judges-of-the-employment-appeal-tribunal/
The EAT now includes His Honour Judge James Tayler who delivered the first instance judgment in Maya Forstater's case.
For those who need a refresher, that judgment included his ruling that Maya's belief that "sex is immutable", "in its absolutist nature, is incompatible with human dignity and fundamental rights of others."
He also ruled as follows re WORIADS:
"When in an, admittedly very bitter, dispute with Gregor Murray, who alleged
that they had been misgendered by the Claimant, rather than seeking to
accommodate Gregor Murrays legitimate wishes she stated: “I had simply
forgotten that this man demands to be referred to by the plural pronouns “they”
and “them”, “Murray also calls it “transphobic” that I recognise a man when I
see one. I disagree”, “In reality Murray is a man. It is Murray’s right to believe
that Murray is not a man, but Murray cannot compel others to believe this.” and
that “I reserve the right to use the pronouns “he” and “him” to refer to male
people. While I may choose to use alternative pronouns as a courtesy, no one
has the right to compel others to make statements they do not believe.”
90. I conclude from this, and the totality of the evidence, that the Claimant is
absolutist in her view of sex and it is a core component of her belief that she
will refer to a person by the sex she considered appropriate even if it violates
their dignity and/or creates an intimidating, hostile, degrading, humiliating or
offensive environment. The approach is not worthy of respect in a democratic
society."
So draw whatever you like from that.
(I assume that most on this board will be very familiar with this judgment and so there was no real need to quote it, but for some reason I felt impelled to practice quoting the actual words used in actual judgments so that I don't don't lose the knack...)