Help protect children from gaming harms.

Take our survey

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Sara Morrison v BFF - thread 6

116 replies

SexRealismBeliefs · 26/11/2025 16:11

Sara Morrison v Belfast Film Festival - Employment Tribunal that took place on 10th to 21st November 2025.

It was live tweeted by Nick Wallis. Tribunal Tweets weren't allowed remote access, and no remote viewing was possible.

Background here:

https://genderblog.net/sara-morrison-v-belfast-film-festival/

Sara Morrison v Belfast Film Festival

Sara Morrison Sara Morrison used to be an inclusion and audience development co-ordinator working full time at Belfast Film Festival. She has an adult, trans-dentifying son. But she is a heretic. B…

https://genderblog.net/sara-morrison-v-belfast-film-festival/

OP posts:
Thread gallery
15
poppsocks · 20/07/2026 12:24

impossibletoday · 19/07/2026 13:15

.

What on Earth is this?!
Please tell me that's photoshopped ...

buckeejit · 20/07/2026 12:39

Sorry Sara, so disappointing for you. Shocking result

AlexandraLeaving · 20/07/2026 12:56

Just catching up with this. What miserable news, even if I was half expecting it after the way the hearings went. Surely she has grounds to appeal, though as has been said many times before, the process is the punishment and it is so unfair that a handful of brave individuals has to fight the fight on behalf of all of us.

prh47bridge · 20/07/2026 12:57

poppsocks · 20/07/2026 12:24

What on Earth is this?!
Please tell me that's photoshopped ...

No, it is not photoshopped. The tribunal genuinely got the names of the barristers the wrong way round. They also referred to the recused panel member as "Professor Deborah Boyd", notwithstanding the fact that she is not a professor.

RoyalCorgi · 20/07/2026 13:20

prh47bridge · 20/07/2026 12:57

No, it is not photoshopped. The tribunal genuinely got the names of the barristers the wrong way round. They also referred to the recused panel member as "Professor Deborah Boyd", notwithstanding the fact that she is not a professor.

Astonishing. It's reminiscent of the f*-up in the Sandie Peggie case where the judgement contained references to other judgements that didn't even exist.

ProfessorBinturong · 20/07/2026 13:31

I don't currently have my notes to hand. Were the "Professor's" lack of academic credentials raised in court, or was the recusal application simply on links to the named groups and likely bias?

I have a vague feeling there was a passing mention of 'we couldn't find her qualifications' but it didn't form a substantial part of the application. But there was so much discussion of it on the thread I may be getting mixed up. If it wasn't raised in court it may be outside judicial knowledge.

SexRealismBeliefs · 20/07/2026 17:08

ProfessorBinturong · 20/07/2026 13:31

I don't currently have my notes to hand. Were the "Professor's" lack of academic credentials raised in court, or was the recusal application simply on links to the named groups and likely bias?

I have a vague feeling there was a passing mention of 'we couldn't find her qualifications' but it didn't form a substantial part of the application. But there was so much discussion of it on the thread I may be getting mixed up. If it wasn't raised in court it may be outside judicial knowledge.

These threads were poured over at trial.

Naomi did impute there was a very tiny foot print available online for an academic.

A judge worth her salt would have made discreet enquiries.

OP posts:
NebulousSupportPostcard · 20/07/2026 17:17

ProfessorBinturong · 20/07/2026 13:31

I don't currently have my notes to hand. Were the "Professor's" lack of academic credentials raised in court, or was the recusal application simply on links to the named groups and likely bias?

I have a vague feeling there was a passing mention of 'we couldn't find her qualifications' but it didn't form a substantial part of the application. But there was so much discussion of it on the thread I may be getting mixed up. If it wasn't raised in court it may be outside judicial knowledge.

NC and CE remained "locked in their lodgings" until late morning that day, and submitted an application for the entire panel to recuse itself. Presumably much more detail was provided than we heard about.

The honorary professor recused herself on unrelated health grounds and the J and TU member declined the application to recuse themselves.

SexRealismBeliefs · 20/07/2026 17:17

SexRealismBeliefs · 20/07/2026 17:08

These threads were poured over at trial.

Naomi did impute there was a very tiny foot print available online for an academic.

A judge worth her salt would have made discreet enquiries.

NC finally - for a [for an] academic PB has a strikingly low
... online profile. We don't know her specialism. We think steps may have been taken to reduce her online presence making it more difficult to make an application of this order.

Session 1
genderblog.net/livetweets/sara-morrison-v-belfast-film-festival-tribunal-day-5/

OP posts:
NebulousSupportPostcard · 20/07/2026 17:50

There are a few YouTube videos. In this one, BB describes herself, in 2013, as "an honorary visiting professor" at the University of Ulster Dept of Environmental Sciences.

IonianNerveGrip · 20/07/2026 17:59

That was all very odd.

JustPlainStanfreyPock · 21/07/2026 08:51

This is awful, thoughts go out to Sara.
I think we need to reinstate all our professorships if the fake professor is still in her chair.
I can understand Sara not wanting any more of this shitshow, but I really hope they don't get away with it.

ProfessorBinturong · 21/07/2026 10:43

She's said on Twitter she's considering options. I think it warrants an appeal, but would entirely understand if she can't face it.

ProfessorBinturong · 21/07/2026 10:43

She's said on Twitter she's considering options. I think it warrants an appeal, but would entirely understand if she can't face it.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Swipe left for the next trending thread