Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Sara Morrison v BFF - thread 6

51 replies

SexRealismBeliefs · 26/11/2025 16:11

Sara Morrison v Belfast Film Festival - Employment Tribunal that took place on 10th to 21st November 2025.

It was live tweeted by Nick Wallis. Tribunal Tweets weren't allowed remote access, and no remote viewing was possible.

Background here:

https://genderblog.net/sara-morrison-v-belfast-film-festival/

Sara Morrison v Belfast Film Festival

Sara Morrison Sara Morrison used to be an inclusion and audience development co-ordinator working full time at Belfast Film Festival. She has an adult, trans-dentifying son. But she is a heretic. B…

https://genderblog.net/sara-morrison-v-belfast-film-festival/

OP posts:
Thread gallery
8
SexRealismBeliefs · 26/11/2025 16:12

Thread 1: https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/4991660-sara-morrison-vs-belfast-film-festival?page=30&reply=148521962

Thread 2: https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5444170-sara-morrison-vs-belfast-film-festival-thread-2?page=31&reply=148550280

Thread 3:
https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5444914-sara-morrison-v-bff-thread-3?page=1

Thread 4:
https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5445740-sara-morrison-v-bff-thread-4?page=33&reply=148616400

Thread 5:
www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5446619-sara-morrison-v-bff-thread-5

Page 30 | Sara Morrison vs Belfast Film Festival | Mumsnet

Employers seem to be slow learners when it comes to women's rights! There’s another employment tribunal case being brought by a woman who attended and...

https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/4991660-sara-morrison-vs-belfast-film-festival?page=30&reply=148521962

OP posts:
SexRealismBeliefs · 26/11/2025 16:15

Thanks to @professormyrtlelion

Case summary

Sara Morrison (SM) was the Inclusion and Audience Development Co-ordinator at Belfast Film Festival (BFF). She has an adult trans-identifying son, helped re-establish rape crisis services in Northern Ireland after a 13-year gap, and believes women’s organisations should maintain women-only spaces for vulnerable women.

Sara spoke at a Let Women Speak event in Belfast on 16 April 2023, criticising several women’s and advocacy organisations for abandoning single-sex principles. She did not identify herself or her employer, but she was recognised.
A targeted online campaign began within hours, tagging BFF and demanding she be dismissed. Sara experienced sustained online abuse and became socially isolated.

Watch the footage here (Sara starts at 1hr 4mins):
She informed BFF Director Michele Devlin (MD), who initially responded supportively. In June 2023, Michele raised concerns about Sara’s views, said the BFF Board had been shown her speech, and questioned her about sharing facilities with trans-identifying people. Sara continued working visibly through the BFF documentary season without incident.

In July 2023, during planning for Belfast Pride, an LGBT arts organisation publicly labelled Sara a “transphobic bigot,” triggering another online pile-on. BFF issued a public statement saying it was “investigating,” which intensified the pressure. An external HR investigation followed. Sara was advised to work from home, lost access to email and shared drives, and was asked to return her office keys. She felt frozen out, viewed the investigation as biased, initiated a grievance, went on sick leave, and began medication.

While she was off sick, MD attended Belfast Pride wearing a “Trans Inclusive Feminist” t-shirt and posted photos online before deleting them.

In June 2024, journalist Jo Bartosch shared Sara’s crowdfunding campaign https://x.com/jo_bartosch/status/1798410239730982919, which was amplified by JK Rowling
https://x.com/jk_rowling/status/1798434418023112789.

In November 2024, Sara resigned from BFF and claimed constructive dismissal.
Sara’s case, Morrison v Belfast Film Festival, is legally significant because in Great Britain, the Forstater ruling (2021, upheld 2022) confirmed that gender-critical beliefs are protected as a philosophical belief under the Equality Act 2010. However, the Equality Act does not apply in Northern Ireland, which instead uses a patchwork of older anti-discrimination laws (including the Sex Discrimination Order 1976 and the Fair Employment and Treatment Order 1998).

How Forstater and the subsequent For Women Scotland Supreme Court ruling interact with Northern Ireland’s legislation is unresolved. As a result, this tribunal in Belfast the following week is being treated as a test case.
Sara is represented by barristers Naomi Cunningham and Charlotte Elves, as well as solicitor Simon Chambers.

Summary extracted from Nick Wallis’ blog about the case: https://genderblog.net/sara-morrison-v-belfast-film-festival/

Sara Morrison v Belfast Film Festival

Sara Morrison Sara Morrison used to be an inclusion and audience development co-ordinator working full time at Belfast Film Festival. She has an adult, trans-dentifying son. But she is a heretic. B…

https://genderblog.net/sara-morrison-v-belfast-film-festival/

OP posts:
OP posts:
ProfessorMyrtleLion · 26/11/2025 17:14

Please fill up thread 5 before starting here. ❤️

SexRealismBeliefs · 26/11/2025 18:40

mackerella · 26/11/2025 17:52

(This is not a proper post! Just that the link to thread five in the OP takes you only to the posts by @SexRealismBeliefs. The link to the whole thread is https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5446619-sara-morrison-v-bff-thread-5)

Woopsies 😳

OP posts:
anyolddinosaur · 26/11/2025 21:32

Mistygreenandblue - cant tag you as you havent posted here yet but to respond to your comment on the last thread. Naomi cant be everywhere but she does seem pretty good at organising court dates so she can get to quite a few places.

ProfessorMyrtleLion · 26/11/2025 22:25

Very nice end to Thread 5.

Beautifully done.

WFTCHTJ · 27/11/2025 01:15

Thanks for the new thread and all the linky stuff.

MistyGreenAndBlue · 27/11/2025 03:15

anyolddinosaur · 26/11/2025 21:32

Mistygreenandblue - cant tag you as you havent posted here yet but to respond to your comment on the last thread. Naomi cant be everywhere but she does seem pretty good at organising court dates so she can get to quite a few places.

True true and I daresay she would have organised it somehow

SexRealismBeliefs · 27/11/2025 16:06

This is why the 'Professor Deborah Boyd' fraud in the Tribunal room gets to me so much.

Here a trainee solicitor embellished his undergrad degree result - and was struck off and is not allowed to become a lawyer.

https://www.lawgazette.co.uk/news/magic-circle-junior-who-lied-in-his-pupillage-application-struck-off/5124995.article

Deborah runs around getting Barristers to call her Professor - and walks out of Tribunal with nary a consequence. She called herself a Judge in that video. I'll wait to see what comes from the UU FOI but it shouldn't be allowed to stand.

Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal sign

Magic circle junior who lied in his pupillage application struck off

Former Slaughter and May associate claimed to have won prize for best overall performance during his final Cambridge year.

https://www.lawgazette.co.uk/news/magic-circle-junior-who-lied-in-his-pupillage-application-struck-off/5124995.article

OP posts:
ProfessorMyrtleLion · 27/11/2025 16:15

SexRealismBeliefs · 27/11/2025 16:06

This is why the 'Professor Deborah Boyd' fraud in the Tribunal room gets to me so much.

Here a trainee solicitor embellished his undergrad degree result - and was struck off and is not allowed to become a lawyer.

https://www.lawgazette.co.uk/news/magic-circle-junior-who-lied-in-his-pupillage-application-struck-off/5124995.article

Deborah runs around getting Barristers to call her Professor - and walks out of Tribunal with nary a consequence. She called herself a Judge in that video. I'll wait to see what comes from the UU FOI but it shouldn't be allowed to stand.

Lying as a lawyer is considered to be beyond the pale because clients and the court have to rely on their word.

So even though he didn't lie about being a solicitor or barrister (as an MP did when he said he was more than a trainee solicitor), I'm not surprised he was struck off.

The terms 'solicitor' and 'barrister' are legally protected, but 'professor' isn't. Having said that, Boyd does sit in judgment (though is not a judge) in legal cases, so I would hope the Northern Ireland Tribunal Service would look poorly on her using that title.

And maybe she should be struck off the panel as a result.

SexRealismBeliefs · 27/11/2025 16:29

ProfessorMyrtleLion · 27/11/2025 16:15

Lying as a lawyer is considered to be beyond the pale because clients and the court have to rely on their word.

So even though he didn't lie about being a solicitor or barrister (as an MP did when he said he was more than a trainee solicitor), I'm not surprised he was struck off.

The terms 'solicitor' and 'barrister' are legally protected, but 'professor' isn't. Having said that, Boyd does sit in judgment (though is not a judge) in legal cases, so I would hope the Northern Ireland Tribunal Service would look poorly on her using that title.

And maybe she should be struck off the panel as a result.

Edited

I know and agree entirely - and I think we need to treat everyone in that room to that higher standard.

Not a week goes past where someone isn't struck off for X or Y. And the 'Professor' is an out and out liar.

OP posts:
ProfessorBinturong · 10/12/2025 09:39

I see Ulster University has replied to the FoI about Boyd with a 'no comment'. Personal info, so won't confirm anything at all.

NebulousSupportPostcard · 10/12/2025 10:42

ProfessorBinturong · 10/12/2025 09:39

I see Ulster University has replied to the FoI about Boyd with a 'no comment'. Personal info, so won't confirm anything at all.

That's really odd, as an honorary title is given precisely for the public recognition it bestows on both parties. A No Comment in that context sounds suspiciously like a "no".

ProfPerfectlySoftButter · 10/12/2025 12:13

Surely all degree’s, honorary or otherwise, are a matter of public record?

TBF I’ve only bothered to check prof qualifications when appointing Trustees but what’s to stop job applicants simply making up their A levels and degrees?

One for the Information Commissioner, I’d think.

ProfessorBinturong · 10/12/2025 12:24

There's been no suggestion or indication that she has an honorary degree, as far as know. The question was whether she'd been employed as a visiting professor. And employment records aren't necessarily a matter of public info.

Rightsraptor · 10/12/2025 14:16

I can't remember the time scale of this, like when Mrs Boyd last fulfilled any visiting professor role, but I was struck when reading the other day when reading about Baroness Falkner. She also had has a visiting professorship (perhaps more than one) but I'm not aware of her calling herself Professor Falkner.

I think someone needs to have a word with Deb.

ProfessorBinturong · 10/12/2025 14:47

We have no idea of the date, duration, location, or reality of Boyd's professorship. Only that she began using the title sometime between 1999 and 2004 IIRC.

NebulousSupportPostcard · 10/12/2025 15:31

ProfPerfectlySoftButter · 10/12/2025 12:13

Surely all degree’s, honorary or otherwise, are a matter of public record?

TBF I’ve only bothered to check prof qualifications when appointing Trustees but what’s to stop job applicants simply making up their A levels and degrees?

One for the Information Commissioner, I’d think.

If they are an important requirement, certificates and transcripts are increasingly required to be produced. A teacher in the family had to take GCSE certificates to be copied before interview as eg Maths grade requirements have become stricter since their uni & graduation days and equivalency tests are needed if certificates not available.

NebulousSupportPostcard · 10/12/2025 15:34

Rightsraptor · 10/12/2025 14:16

I can't remember the time scale of this, like when Mrs Boyd last fulfilled any visiting professor role, but I was struck when reading the other day when reading about Baroness Falkner. She also had has a visiting professorship (perhaps more than one) but I'm not aware of her calling herself Professor Falkner.

I think someone needs to have a word with Deb.

I've since noticed on linkedin that people tend to list expired visiting professorships on their resume, in the same way as they list previous employment roles. Because they stand as evidence of an important respectable appointment. But are obviously not a valid current title.

Londonmummy66 · 11/12/2025 15:03

NebulousSupportPostcard · 10/12/2025 15:34

I've since noticed on linkedin that people tend to list expired visiting professorships on their resume, in the same way as they list previous employment roles. Because they stand as evidence of an important respectable appointment. But are obviously not a valid current title.

I've seen this on a lot of CVs and think it is helpful to see as it is normally an indication of a serious contribution to a field.

AngelinaJoyless · 04/01/2026 16:06

Am hopelessly behind on all ETs, but just wanted to add my thanks and admiration to all involved, both the indomitable women who stand firm, and for the Mumsnet wims who make it all make sense. Having the critical thinking of a mushroom(menopause) means I am reliant on your fantastic intellects, and I am grateful to you all. May I grab a drink when the trolley passes? This is thirsty work.

MarieDeGournay · 04/01/2026 16:12

That's a lovely post, AngelinaJoyless.
Here comes the drinks trolley - sláinte!Smile

weegielass · 04/01/2026 17:01

pops head back into threads

Can anyone remind me of when a judgement is expected? How many pages do we think it will be and how many errors 😁