So there is a fair bit of legal wrangling over the list of issues and pleaded case.
Last Tuesday Naomi sought to raise a matter before the Tribunal which was to say that the claimants pleased case was that the ‘email of 3rd July sent by Michele Devlin to the long list of third parties was in fact an act of harassment’. Sean said that as Sara had already given evidence, that in sending the email Michele was being supportive, why would they plead a case contrary? Naomi’s view was that Sara couldn’t have known what was in the respondents mind at the time.
Naomi said that Charlotte had checked and they were content it was properly pleaded in (maybe the 2nd) ET1 form.
It did however need to be added to the list of issues. Queue lots of discussion around this. The Judge said they had a wide latitude to decide matters to take into account and would consider the point, Naomi was clear that if it wasn’t accepted she could make that case to the matter in issue then she would make an application to amend. Seemed to be settled - add to list of issues, no need to amend, on we go.
Yesterday then mid morning there was some debate where Sean suggests he didn’t consent to this being accepted as an issue. There was back and forth on this - and Naomi pointed out her entire case was built on the 3rd July email was not a supportive and co-collaboration with Sara, but rather an email about a made up event, with the cc to 44 addresses being stuffed to the gills with Sara haters by Michele designed to provoke a reaction.
The Judge checked her notes and would check further but she agreed it was something she expected the Tribunal to draw a conclusion on. Naomi said it followed that if it wasn’t in the case she’d make an amendment to change pleadings. It didn’t follow that they agreed the matter couldn’t be spoken to if Naomi had then spend a week building her case. Judge checked and it was in list of issues. They came back to it later to confirm if there was an issue or would be delat with in submissions. It wasn’t obvious last week what point Naomi was making - but was totally clear yesterday.
Mark Cousins, charismatic board member of ~20 years sends an email on 28 June saying something must be done.
Michele asks for a LGBT list form Sara on 29 June. She chases it.
- Michele’s case has been we worked on this together. It was her and Sara’s work. She just pressed send.
- In fact Sara not sending the email was refusal to do her job.
- Michele cooked up PRIDE ON THE BIG SCREEN. (I’ve now seen evidence that it was BIGLY).
- What became really clear in evidence is that Sara provided a much shorter list of LGBT organisations. And added some more but say 14 organisations. So she was expecting that to go. She goes home.
- After hours at 5.50pm - *Michelle starts adding in lots of random personal email addresses, women’s groups, rape support groups, specific women’s groups Sara called out in her LWS group. She thinks let’s get Sara’s name in front of LGBTQ groups + women’s rights organisation she called out in her speech. She’d stuffed the email cc with circa 44 recipients.
- Naomi asked her in evidence about what X group or Y group. Michele suddenly changed all her evidence. It was now for a family day and everyone welcome. Naomi said who is E O’Neil and Michele said oh shes gay, And the WINI, I assume Women’s Institute NI, Michele said they might have gay members. So she sat and said I added in random people who I knew to be gay, a bunch of random women’s groups as well as legit LGBTQIA. But for the most part there is not a shred of evidence most of them had done any work with BFF ever.
It shocking for her to be caught out in a lie - Sara did not co create the email. Sara was uncomfortable starting a new project so soon to pride, it was not fully formed. She had been harassed online by these people.
And then Michele took the reins, adds in any potential Sara hater she can think of, doesn’t need to be LGBTQIA, to an email about an LGBTQIA event that is never actually going to happen.
Boom 💥
Oh and it’s sent to Falls Women Centre, Ardoyne, Sinn Fein. Naomi asked - so no DUP then? Michele said no.
Because the former ‘West Belfast Film Festival’ will only stand by their Trans if they are a Green trans. And the Board approved Michele to be in a promotional video endorsing Sinn Fein.
Ans Michele’s political statement supporting Green politics together with the fact that Orange Trans aren’t invited doesn’t raise an eye?