Help end medical misogyny. Sign our petition.

Help end medical misogyny.
Sign our petition.

Sign the petition

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

Advice please - TIM teacher just arrived at DD’s school

1000 replies

KnottyAuty · 06/11/2025 06:50

DD reports that the new teacher has asked to be referred to as she/her and Ms Smith. They are obviously male. DD isn’t happy about the power imbalance of potential behaviour points and detentions for non compliance.

I’ve got no idea how to advice DD how to handle this but obviously know from reading here that using this language is a safeguarding problem. Ms Smith should follow the same rules as all the other male teachers. If everyone must use this language, then it looks like the school is unable to tolerate GC beliefs.

Suggesting that DD respectfully avoids pronouns doesn’t seem workable as using the teacher’s name will include “Miss”….

Is there a gender neutral way of referring to a teacher like “Professor”?!

What do I advise DD so she can work within her GC beliefs? And what should I write to the school to say about this?

eta clarification

OP posts:
Thread gallery
21
1potato2potato3potatofor · 06/11/2025 12:03

I'm be fine with my child calling the teacher by the first name, such as 'Caroline'. However, changing pronouns or using Ms would not be ok.

Having respect for others' beliefs does not compel us to demonstrate that belief and then expressing that through language or any other action. The child's belief is that this person is male and that belief must also be respected, no? Particularly as it is our current scientific understanding and supported by law.

TheAutumnalCrow · 06/11/2025 12:03

dizzydizzydizzy · 06/11/2025 11:46

Obviously I know that. What the kids have to call the teacher has no impact on how that teacher teaches them. It seems like a total non-issue to me.

What, being forced to collude in a dishonest man’s delusion? In a girls’ school?

Howseitgoin · 06/11/2025 12:03

Holdmeclosertinydancer2018 · 06/11/2025 11:50

I assume you are referring to the elephant man who couldn't help his physical condition?

What similarities did he have with modern day men who want to be women, pray tell?

"What similarities did he have with modern day men who want to be women, pray tell?

Common social & cultural associations/inclinations.

I assume you are referring to the elephant man who couldn't help his physical condition?

The point you are spectacularly missing is the dehumanising & demonising of the non conforming.

And how do you know "they can't help it"?

TheAutumnalCrow · 06/11/2025 12:05

I am not engaging with the interruptatonasaurus.

MO0N · 06/11/2025 12:07

TheAutumnalCrow · 06/11/2025 07:12

Smithy?

"Oi, Smithy! Yes you; the bloke in a dress."

RapidOnsetGenderCritic · 06/11/2025 12:07

JadeSquid · 06/11/2025 07:41

Yes it is hate speech to be frank. I cannot believe a big site like this who is so reliant on advertising would allow blatant hate speech like this. Yeah sure speak about your gender critical views but calling trans people perverts and the like is way too far.

MN doesn't allow hate speech. It is effectively moderated. Show me any post before yours that includes hate speech. You probably won't even be able to show me one following yours that includes hate speech, because it will be reported and deleted promptly.

Citrusbergamia · 06/11/2025 12:09

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Couldn't agree more! 👏

pandering to these men, forcing young girls to pretend that he's a woman...fuck sake. Just NO!!!

Justme56 · 06/11/2025 12:09

I agree. Respect should work both ways. A transperson may prefer certain ways of being addressed but that’s all they should be able to. Make it a preference rather than compulsory. That way they are respecting others beliefs rather than trying to force their own onto others.

RozGruber · 06/11/2025 12:11

TheaBrandt1 · 06/11/2025 07:32

Why would the op be misgendered? It’s glaringly obvious which sex 99.99999% of people are

Even if your 99.9% statistic were true you would have no way to know that. Literally by definition you don’t notice the ones who pass because you don’t even know they are trans.

GiantTeddyIsTired · 06/11/2025 12:11

Howseitgoin · 06/11/2025 06:59

Maybe explain to her that pronouns aren't a belief system but rather a social convention that signals respect for other's people's dignity as in their right to choices regardless if you agree with them or not.

Quite a useful lesson in the social contract one would rationally think.

Edited

I'd say they are a social contract that signals respect for other people's dignity, when used conventionally.

When you are demanding a title that is not yours to claim (eg. if I asked to be called Lady Teddy or Dr Teddy) then it's actually signalling something very different, and smacks of controlling behaviour (and in some cases, fraud).

It's certainly a safeguarding failure, as by using female pronouns for a male, you're hiding a material part of their risk profile.

RausMitDerLaus · 06/11/2025 12:11

Just call them what they want to be called. You can twist it into somehow infringing your rights to hold your beliefs but how does this help society? Save your protest for when it matters (e.g. when the school insists that this teacher can monitor the toilets, or when the teacher tries to convince kids they are born in the wrong body or any other safe guarding issue).

If I insisted on following my belief system for every little thing my life would be full of unnecessary conflict till the point where no one spoke to me anymore. Im an atheist and think people who have faith are deluded but I dont need to make thst clear to every person of faith I meet especially when they aren't hurting anyone with their faith.

Your daughter could see the address as part of the name. So 'Miss Smith' is her full name, the name she wants to be called by. It's like calling a girl Jo or Sam or George if that's what they want to be called. As long as it doesn't hurt anyone why are you unnecessarily creating conflict?

cherish123 · 06/11/2025 12:11

Howseitgoin · 06/11/2025 06:59

Maybe explain to her that pronouns aren't a belief system but rather a social convention that signals respect for other's people's dignity as in their right to choices regardless if you agree with them or not.

Quite a useful lesson in the social contract one would rationally think.

Edited

They are a belief system.

ArabellaSaurus · 06/11/2025 12:12

Whathappend · 06/11/2025 07:09

Will DD actually need to say a name at all? If she needs teacher's attention, can't she say "excuse me?"

This. Just don't use his name, at all.

Are there other male teachers?

Howseitgoin · 06/11/2025 12:13

GiantTeddyIsTired · 06/11/2025 12:11

I'd say they are a social contract that signals respect for other people's dignity, when used conventionally.

When you are demanding a title that is not yours to claim (eg. if I asked to be called Lady Teddy or Dr Teddy) then it's actually signalling something very different, and smacks of controlling behaviour (and in some cases, fraud).

It's certainly a safeguarding failure, as by using female pronouns for a male, you're hiding a material part of their risk profile.

It's not fraudulent if there's an association. Definitions rely on associations which gender provides.

GiantTeddyIsTired · 06/11/2025 12:13

tapaw · 06/11/2025 11:54

My DD had a teacher who was trans. Born male, identified as female, had surgery/name change. There was no issue at all. Teacher was excellent, supportive, DD got a 9 in the GCSE.

Can't your DD just ask a question with "excuse me?" or something? Shouldn't need to use pronouns at all.

You know they had surgery? When/how did the teacher share that! That seems hugely inappropriate.

Bagsintheboot · 06/11/2025 12:13

Hang on a moment. This person has been called a complete bastard, a pervert, and a fetishist (and yes, those posts have been deleted but still), for doing nothing more than apparently being trans and a teacher.

We know he's not a woman. We know he shouldn't be allowed in single sex spaces. But he's still allowed to work and generally exist in society within the law. He can dress how he likes, he can call himself what he likes. OP hasn't said he's done anything wrong, she's asking for help for her daughter to navigate it.

RausMitDerLaus · 06/11/2025 12:14

GiantTeddyIsTired · 06/11/2025 12:11

I'd say they are a social contract that signals respect for other people's dignity, when used conventionally.

When you are demanding a title that is not yours to claim (eg. if I asked to be called Lady Teddy or Dr Teddy) then it's actually signalling something very different, and smacks of controlling behaviour (and in some cases, fraud).

It's certainly a safeguarding failure, as by using female pronouns for a male, you're hiding a material part of their risk profile.

Lady could be a name. Do you also object to calling Madonna Madonna even though i highly doubt she is the mum of jesus?

ArabellaSaurus · 06/11/2025 12:14

RausMitDerLaus · 06/11/2025 12:11

Just call them what they want to be called. You can twist it into somehow infringing your rights to hold your beliefs but how does this help society? Save your protest for when it matters (e.g. when the school insists that this teacher can monitor the toilets, or when the teacher tries to convince kids they are born in the wrong body or any other safe guarding issue).

If I insisted on following my belief system for every little thing my life would be full of unnecessary conflict till the point where no one spoke to me anymore. Im an atheist and think people who have faith are deluded but I dont need to make thst clear to every person of faith I meet especially when they aren't hurting anyone with their faith.

Your daughter could see the address as part of the name. So 'Miss Smith' is her full name, the name she wants to be called by. It's like calling a girl Jo or Sam or George if that's what they want to be called. As long as it doesn't hurt anyone why are you unnecessarily creating conflict?

I don't and won't call a priest 'Father', because it's not my religion. I don't say 'peace be upon him' every time I say 'Mohammed'. Insisting I have to do so is the same deal.

MrsOvertonsWindow · 06/11/2025 12:14

OnAShooglyPeg · 06/11/2025 11:59

There's two strands to this - what you do, and what your daughter does.

You need to engage the headteacher either in writing or in person and make sure your understanding of the scenario is correct, and discuss what happens next. You need to make sure they know your discomfort and that your child will not be compelled to use language against their beliefs or participate in someone else's delusion.

Your child has to decide how to address this. I would be inclined to go with the less drastic option of simply remaining neutral and not using any form of sex-based pronoun or title. Depending on what they are teaching, it may be possible to simply grey rock them, although not ideal. Alternatively, your child could protest, but as with someone who speaks up in the workplace, they (and you!) must be aware of what comes after in terms of processes, punishment, and likely outcomes.

This is a good response.
The OP needs to address this at parent level getting the school to clarify how they are managing the issue, whether there would be any consequences for children who accurately sex this man and asking for clarification re his role in changing rooms, toilets, medical care etc. This is a parent's role with the onus being put on the school to clarify how they are safeguarding children

Your daughter also needs protecting. So many adherents of this ideology use extreme bullying, intimidation and threats to push their niche views. They wouldn't hesitate to target your DD. In the light of that (not saying it's right to bow down to bullies but it is the grim reality for women and girls) whatever decisions she makes, need to be with an eye on her safety and wellbeing.

Put the onus on the school to explain how they will balance all this and ensure all children are safeguarded.

GiantTeddyIsTired · 06/11/2025 12:15

Howseitgoin · 06/11/2025 12:13

It's not fraudulent if there's an association. Definitions rely on associations which gender provides.

Grammatical gender is based on sex. The association is with a person's sex, not with their fashion choices or feelings.

Demanding someone uses the wrong pronouns for your sex is absolutely fraud (not in the legal sense obviously, but in the attempting to deceive sense)

Toutafait · 06/11/2025 12:17

JadeSquid · 06/11/2025 12:00

If people were in such immediate danger, of course they'd enter to stop it happening. But for teenagers just changing their clothes, it is not necessary for them to supervise us so closely in a state of undress.

I'm sure it's not uncommon for some issue in the girls' changing room to be reported. That should surely be followed up by a female teacher entering the changing room, where some girls may be changing. Otherwise it becomes a prime location for bullying and potentially sexual assault by boys entering the changing room.

RapidOnsetGenderCritic · 06/11/2025 12:17

YourFairCyanReader · 06/11/2025 07:58

I think that acknowledging Miss Smith is a biological male, albeit living a female identity, shouldn't be given sex-dependent roles such as accessing female accommodation on a school trip or housemistress etc, is GC. Refusing to call a trans person by their preferred name and pronoun is just transphobic.

If your DD is going to uni I would expect she will find herself heavily ostracised if she won't respect that lots of people want to live as different genders to their sex.

NB Is this a new teacher to the school - do you know it's a man?

Is 'their preferred name and pronouns' really a preference? I have a preference to be taken out for a curry rather than being given takeaway fish and chips; if someone doesn't take my preference into account, I have no cause to complain.

I think what we are talking about is a demand.

ArabellaSaurus · 06/11/2025 12:17

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

JadeSquid · 06/11/2025 12:18

RapidOnsetGenderCritic · 06/11/2025 12:07

MN doesn't allow hate speech. It is effectively moderated. Show me any post before yours that includes hate speech. You probably won't even be able to show me one following yours that includes hate speech, because it will be reported and deleted promptly.

There were. The thread was shut. I assume they were deleted. So in one sense you are right, but at least one poster is still posting
.

GiantTeddyIsTired · 06/11/2025 12:18

RausMitDerLaus · 06/11/2025 12:14

Lady could be a name. Do you also object to calling Madonna Madonna even though i highly doubt she is the mum of jesus?

I was obviously talking about titles, not names.

Although actually, if you tried to officially use a reserved title (eg Prince) as a name, the registrar will likely reject it as misleading.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread