Help end medical misogyny. Sign our petition.

Help end medical misogyny.
Sign our petition.

Sign the petition

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

Advice please - TIM teacher just arrived at DD’s school

1000 replies

KnottyAuty · 06/11/2025 06:50

DD reports that the new teacher has asked to be referred to as she/her and Ms Smith. They are obviously male. DD isn’t happy about the power imbalance of potential behaviour points and detentions for non compliance.

I’ve got no idea how to advice DD how to handle this but obviously know from reading here that using this language is a safeguarding problem. Ms Smith should follow the same rules as all the other male teachers. If everyone must use this language, then it looks like the school is unable to tolerate GC beliefs.

Suggesting that DD respectfully avoids pronouns doesn’t seem workable as using the teacher’s name will include “Miss”….

Is there a gender neutral way of referring to a teacher like “Professor”?!

What do I advise DD so she can work within her GC beliefs? And what should I write to the school to say about this?

eta clarification

OP posts:
Thread gallery
21
nicepotoftea · 06/11/2025 19:58

JadeSquid · 06/11/2025 19:53

Yes I am asking in that situation, whose safety is it about?

Why does it have to be a teacher?

The question you are asking is whether a woman would avoid using men's single sex facilities to protect herself from risk or to protect the dignity and privacy of the men.

The answer is both.

JadeSquid · 06/11/2025 19:59

GeneralPeter · 06/11/2025 19:54

Let’s be honest. Safeguarding screening, DBS checks etc all exist to safeguard against men.

For every one sexually-predatory woman they exist to filter out there are 50+++ sexually-predatory men to keep out.

How likely is it that we’d have such procedures at all, if men’s offending rate were the same as women’s?

No they exist to make sure that people are not at too high a risk of exploiting their role to commit criminal acts. They're used as much to ensure someone does not have a history of theft or fraud as they are violent offences. In fact, there are some jobs you could not get with a history of theft, but could with a history of violence.

Actually come to think of it, I know someone who was turned down for the police due such a history, yet we now know many of them have a history of violent crime.

JadeSquid · 06/11/2025 20:00

nicepotoftea · 06/11/2025 19:58

Why does it have to be a teacher?

The question you are asking is whether a woman would avoid using men's single sex facilities to protect herself from risk or to protect the dignity and privacy of the men.

The answer is both.

No I'm asking about why we prevent teachers from being around children who are undressed.

FictionalCharacter · 06/11/2025 20:01

What a horrible position to put children in. I don't agree with using preferred pronouns to be "respectful". A man impersonating a woman hasn't earned my respect, and he certainly isn't respecting us when he expects and demands to be addressed as though he's one of us.

Pronouns are Rohypnol: a good read

Pronouns are Rohypnol • Fair Play For Women

There’s a lot of chat around about pronouns right now. Specifically, ‘preferred’ pronouns. By which is usually meant, the pronouns a person would prefer.

https://fairplayforwomen.com/pronouns/

GeneralPeter · 06/11/2025 20:01

JadeSquid · 06/11/2025 19:56

If men were really that high risk, we wouldnt allow them out or in most of the roles they assume. A minority of men are responsible for the majority of violent crime and sexual offences. The majority of men are not predatory or violent. The majority of trans women arent just men with a fetish.

So you’d agree it’s important to understand who these extra-elevated risk men are then.

I’m still curious what your answer is to your own question.

What do you think explains the extraordinarily high share of the UK’s trans prisoners who are convicted for sexual crimes?

RoostingHens · 06/11/2025 20:01

JadeSquid · 06/11/2025 20:00

No I'm asking about why we prevent teachers from being around children who are undressed.

Privacy, dignity and safety

JadeSquid · 06/11/2025 20:02

Shortshriftandlethal · 06/11/2025 19:58

Do you have any inkling of the reasons that females are more vulnerable than males? (Males tend to be bigger and certainly stronger; and females can become pregnant). Male sexual response is programmed differently to the female sexual response.....and this is one of the reasons that paraphilias and fetishes are far, far more common in males than in females.

Have you ever been the victim of voyeurism, or of a man touching you up, or masturbating or exposing himself in front of you?

Why do you think we have single sex spaces in the first instance?

Edited

Yes. I also know that we have growing reports of female teachers abusing children in their care. Particularly teenagers where they claim it was an equal relationship or even that the child was the initiator or abuser in the situation.

user12367e7e7 · 06/11/2025 20:03

TheOnlyLivingBoyInNewCross · 06/11/2025 06:56

Interesting one! My general policy is that I respect an individual’s wishes in terms of what they want to be called. It’s the use of female only spaces and the more general policing of language and determination to erase the existence of biological women in that (people with cervixes; chest feeding, etc) which is where I fight my battles.

This

JadeSquid · 06/11/2025 20:04

GeneralPeter · 06/11/2025 20:01

So you’d agree it’s important to understand who these extra-elevated risk men are then.

I’m still curious what your answer is to your own question.

What do you think explains the extraordinarily high share of the UK’s trans prisoners who are convicted for sexual crimes?

We dont have a high number of trans people convicted of sex crimes. We have a large number of men on the prison population who transition after being imprisoned for sex offences. They weren't trans identifying at the time of conviction.

Shortshriftandlethal · 06/11/2025 20:04

JadeSquid · 06/11/2025 19:56

If men were really that high risk, we wouldnt allow them out or in most of the roles they assume. A minority of men are responsible for the majority of violent crime and sexual offences. The majority of men are not predatory or violent. The majority of trans women arent just men with a fetish.

A fetish is when you obsess about an object or about certain items of clothing, a certain set of actions.

Men who adopt feminine trans identities make a fetish out of what they imagine it is to be female. They tend to wear hyper feminine or sexualised clothing; spend inordinate amounts of time on hair and make -up and 'getting ready'. They practice poses and mannerisms. This is fetishistic behaviour. It is thoroughly incongruous and makes the presence of that man in a female space a very uncomfortable experience.

I see such men around my city on a frequent basis and it is clear that much of it is sexually motivated, whether they are gay or straight.

RoostingHens · 06/11/2025 20:06

JadeSquid · 06/11/2025 20:04

We dont have a high number of trans people convicted of sex crimes. We have a large number of men on the prison population who transition after being imprisoned for sex offences. They weren't trans identifying at the time of conviction.

So you are saying being trans is something that comes and goes and not something innate?

GeneralPeter · 06/11/2025 20:07

JadeSquid · 06/11/2025 19:59

No they exist to make sure that people are not at too high a risk of exploiting their role to commit criminal acts. They're used as much to ensure someone does not have a history of theft or fraud as they are violent offences. In fact, there are some jobs you could not get with a history of theft, but could with a history of violence.

Actually come to think of it, I know someone who was turned down for the police due such a history, yet we now know many of them have a history of violent crime.

I should have prefaced my post with “When it comes to the topic we are discussing….” but I felt that was taken as read.

From now on, please read all my posts as if they start as such.

Shortshriftandlethal · 06/11/2025 20:08

JadeSquid · 06/11/2025 20:04

We dont have a high number of trans people convicted of sex crimes. We have a large number of men on the prison population who transition after being imprisoned for sex offences. They weren't trans identifying at the time of conviction.

There are many men who have adopted trans identities and then who have been arrested or charged with violent or sexual crimes, including against children. Reddux is an excellent resource which collates examples of this.

BettyBooper · 06/11/2025 20:09

JadeSquid · 06/11/2025 19:32

No i am summarising what the research says. I'm sorry that it doesn't support your conclusions. Research can be a bugger like that.

Earlier, you said that you were new to this, and now you're referencing 'research'.

Quick turnaround.

GeneralPeter · 06/11/2025 20:10

JadeSquid · 06/11/2025 20:04

We dont have a high number of trans people convicted of sex crimes. We have a large number of men on the prison population who transition after being imprisoned for sex offences. They weren't trans identifying at the time of conviction.

It’s possible. That trans identification is widely abused by predatory men for their own purposes. Is there data for that? What should we do with such knowledge if that is the case?

RoostingHens · 06/11/2025 20:10

user12367e7e7 · 06/11/2025 20:03

This

Someone else who thinks if they destroy the meaning of a word in one context they won’t then find the meaning has also been destroyed in other contexts that matter to them.

lifeturnsonadime · 06/11/2025 20:10

How do the children benefit from having to lie about the sex of this teacher.

Who is being centred here? The man or the children he teaches?

JadeSquid · 06/11/2025 20:11

Shortshriftandlethal · 06/11/2025 20:04

A fetish is when you obsess about an object or about certain items of clothing, a certain set of actions.

Men who adopt feminine trans identities make a fetish out of what they imagine it is to be female. They tend to wear hyper feminine or sexualised clothing; spend inordinate amounts of time on hair and make -up and 'getting ready'. They practice poses and mannerisms. This is fetishistic behaviour. It is thoroughly incongruous and makes the presence of that man in a female space a very uncomfortable experience.

I see such men around my city on a frequent basis and it is clear that much of it is sexually motivated, whether they are gay or straight.

Edited

Probably because they want to pass as women. That isn't the definition of a fetish by the way.

JadeSquid · 06/11/2025 20:11

GeneralPeter · 06/11/2025 20:10

It’s possible. That trans identification is widely abused by predatory men for their own purposes. Is there data for that? What should we do with such knowledge if that is the case?

Apply it to the populations for which it is relevant. In this case, prisoners .

JadeSquid · 06/11/2025 20:12

BettyBooper · 06/11/2025 20:09

Earlier, you said that you were new to this, and now you're referencing 'research'.

Quick turnaround.

Google is really quick.

lifeturnsonadime · 06/11/2025 20:12

JadeSquid · 06/11/2025 20:02

Yes. I also know that we have growing reports of female teachers abusing children in their care. Particularly teenagers where they claim it was an equal relationship or even that the child was the initiator or abuser in the situation.

Receipts please.

It is nowhere near the number of men.

CohensDiamondTeeth · 06/11/2025 20:13

5128gap · 06/11/2025 17:14

Don't get me wrong, I agree with the principle behind your views. However, the OP is asking about a practical situation, and in the absence of a law to prevent him, the teacher is within his rights to call himself Ms Smith, and his employer is within its rights go along with that title and to require others to use it in an environment they control.
An insistence by the OP her DD calls him Mr Smith or Sir will not be accepted, and GC beliefs will not change this, given the DD is not being asked to believe he's a woman, or (presumably) treat him as a woman when sex matters.
If he starts to supervise girls changing for PE, or is put forward as the 'female' staff member on a residential, then we're talking.

I also understand where you are coming from, and I agree that the OP needs practical solutions - which I'm not really able to offer sadly, I wish I could help.

I'm just angered by the compelled language in a girls school. I do feel it's indoctrination. It does go against Cass recommendations, as other PPs have rightly pointed out compelled pronouns are not a neutral act.

Dependant on OP's situation, I'd be inclined to fight this, while looking for another school just in case. I'd want to get answers to all the questions posed in this thread from the school first off, and I'd go in armed with all the resources and knowledge from this thread to back me up.

It shouldn't be like this, but on balance I think the harm of exposing my young female child to this dangerous ideology which requires compliance and silence from women is greater in the long term than the upheaval of a change of school - This is all dependant on OP & her DD's circumstances obviously! I can see where there may be circumstances where the change of school would ultimately be more damaging to the DD too.

All this with the disclaimer of it's really easy for me to say all this, it's not happening to my DD, I understand in practice this is possibly a long and stressful road ahead for the OP and her DD.

@KnottyAuty Flowers for you and your daughter, this is a really shite position to find yourselves in. I'm angry for you both, and I hope you manage to figure out the best way to deal with it for you.

JadeSquid · 06/11/2025 20:13

RoostingHens · 06/11/2025 20:06

So you are saying being trans is something that comes and goes and not something innate?

I am saying that we have no reason to distrust trans people in the general population.

RoostingHens · 06/11/2025 20:15

JadeSquid · 06/11/2025 20:13

I am saying that we have no reason to distrust trans people in the general population.

So why are LGBT+ organisations are telling us we can’t trust such men to stay out of women’s spaces?

TheKeatingFive · 06/11/2025 20:16

JadeSquid · 06/11/2025 20:13

I am saying that we have no reason to distrust trans people in the general population.

However we have no reason to treat them differently to other men

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.