Help end medical misogyny. Sign our petition.

Help end medical misogyny.
Sign our petition.

Sign the petition

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

Advice please - TIM teacher just arrived at DD’s school

1000 replies

KnottyAuty · 06/11/2025 06:50

DD reports that the new teacher has asked to be referred to as she/her and Ms Smith. They are obviously male. DD isn’t happy about the power imbalance of potential behaviour points and detentions for non compliance.

I’ve got no idea how to advice DD how to handle this but obviously know from reading here that using this language is a safeguarding problem. Ms Smith should follow the same rules as all the other male teachers. If everyone must use this language, then it looks like the school is unable to tolerate GC beliefs.

Suggesting that DD respectfully avoids pronouns doesn’t seem workable as using the teacher’s name will include “Miss”….

Is there a gender neutral way of referring to a teacher like “Professor”?!

What do I advise DD so she can work within her GC beliefs? And what should I write to the school to say about this?

eta clarification

OP posts:
Thread gallery
21
FanFckingTastic · 06/11/2025 17:36

You seem to have great offence that Ms Smith appears to not be female at birth.
but does it hurt you?
does it hurt ms smith’s teaching?
does it hurt DD?

Ms Smith is a male.

Ms Smith is asking the female children to pretend that he is also female, and use female pronouns.

It doesn't 'hurt' the children but it sure will be confusing for them. They can hear, see and smell that Ms Smith is a male, but are required to call him 'Ms'. I would imagine that they will be concerned / confused by this, particularly as they are likely to slip up.

I'm not sure whether Ms Smith's teaching would be impacted, but I would be concerned that Ms Smith might spend more time policing the language of the children, rather than teaching them algebra.

Ultimately what we are asking the children to do is to lie. I can see why the OP is uncomfortable with asking her child to do this.

Ddakji · 06/11/2025 17:37

Aimtodobetter · 06/11/2025 17:31

I’m sorry but why on earth do her beliefs stop her using the term Miss. If her teacherasked her to be called a nickname (eg Nick instead of Nicolas) or something else not identical to her birth certificate would she have a problem with it? How is this different - she can just view it as a preferred nickname if she likes. I understand how different aspects of the trans movement can be challenging for different people but this seems a pretty unpleasant hill to die on just to prove your DD’s point that she doesn’t accept trans people in any form whatsoever including where their personal beliefs about their own identity have zero impact on anyone else. As for it being a “safeguarding” issue - there is nothing in your post that gives a reason for there being such an issue and most all girls schools have male teachers - I assume from the overall tone than you would have mentioned it if there was something more concrete to cause concern.

This is a male teacher trying to hide that he’s male 🚩🚩🚩🚩🚩🚩🚩

GeneralPeter · 06/11/2025 17:38

dinochum · 06/11/2025 15:38

Yes. Be kind.
Because the alternative is to be the sort of person I actively teach my children not to be.

If your daughter grows up to be the head teacher, does kindness dictate that she must compel students to say ‘Miss’? Because the compulsion in this scenario is coming from one direction only. No one here has said students must banned from doing so.

Under what circumstances does kindness compel obedience?

GreyPearlSatin · 06/11/2025 17:39

MrsOvertonsWindow · 06/11/2025 17:31

I disagree with your point that "you haven't got the right to decide that for others, especially not your own children". Undermining parental authority and roles is baked into transgender ideology. This belief has been imposed on society via threats, intimidation, bullying, public humiliation and threats of violence. Parents in these situations have to balance how to manage them without doing further harm to their children and setting unhinged transactivists on them.

To date there have been countless instances of schools transitioning children in secret from their parents, promoting parental alienation and setting social services on parents bigoted enough to be concerned that their children are being groomed into believing a sex change will cure their pubertal angst. All of these actions openly undermining the parental role and fundamental safeguarding principles of working in partnership with parents.

I know it's utterly terrifying to parents discovering that schools have stepped outside their professional roles and are promoting sex change as positive to children, in defiance of a school's legal duty to be politically impartial.

Parents must be prepared to be the adult and step in. It's not up to children to safeguard themselves. Yes it's bloody difficult with so many adults being in thrall to transgenderism rather than prioritising the wellbeing of children.

But no parent should feel it's not their role to step in. It absolutely is!

Edited

You missed the point I was making.

What I am saying is that it's not up to OP to tell their child they must stand up for themselves in this instance.

And, yes, OP could go to the school and kick up a fuss, but that is still not standing up for yourself. It might at best be standing up for your child, but since OP is not going to be their 24/7, there is a risk the school will take it out on the child like some schools do with "difficult parents". It shouldn't happen, but sometimes it does and it is something to consider before deciding.

AnSolas · 06/11/2025 17:39

BloominNora · 06/11/2025 14:13

Titles are not based on sex category - if they were, then there would have to be male / female equivalents for professor and doctor.

The only reason Mr is used for men and Miss / Mrs for women is because society has assigned them that way - they are gender coded in the same way household roles, jobs, clothes, makeup, names and toys are. They have absolutely nothing to do with biological reality of someone's sex.

He and She are different because they are the pronouns that are used to classify someone's biological sex.

The reason that professor and doctor were "male" only title words is that females were not allowed to participate in these roles in public life.

There is no need for a society to create a sexed word for a role that society would allow women to carryout.

GiantTeddyIsTired · 06/11/2025 17:40

Calling a transwoman "Mr." or "Sir" to his face is probably tipping the balance too far: it would be your daughter drawing attention to her own beliefs, and forcing them on everybody else. It would also be very disruptive.

LOL.

Why would it be disruptive to call a male teacher Mr? Why is it bad to draw attention to her beliefs, but not to his?

Only here many posters would actually say "I'm not Christian and I wish everyone 'Merry Christmas' there's no problem with expecting that it's just being polite!"
Sure noone is saying you can't, but compelling someone (such as someone who works in a shop and is Muslim) would be wrong.

When I lived in Malaysia, all the shopping centres kitted out for Christmas and most shop staff, and my colleagues wished me a Merry Christmas with a smile - just like in return, I'd say 'Eid Mubarak' to them..... because that's what people do in polite society.

RoostingHens · 06/11/2025 17:43

GreyPearlSatin · 06/11/2025 17:12

The problem is that it would not be the OP standing up for herself, but it would be her daughter. Furthermore, if OP goes to the school and kicks up a fuss there is a risk the school will take it out on her daughter.

It's fine if you want to stand up for yourself, but you haven't got the right to decide that for others, especially not your own children.

It is essential that adults stand up for children who are at a safeguarding risk. What else do you think OP should ignore because you don’t think she has the right to protect her DD? (Parental rights are a thing)

Helleofabore · 06/11/2025 17:46

How can his name be legally Ms Smith?

Why are there posts on this thread that keep referring to 'Ms' as if this title is a first name? Am I missing something here?

RoostingHens · 06/11/2025 17:47

ArabellaSaurus · 06/11/2025 17:24

It protects them. Children are not obliged to not discriminate.

Yes agree. They are individuals and the equality act doesn’t apply to individuals.

GreyPearlSatin · 06/11/2025 17:48

RoostingHens · 06/11/2025 17:43

It is essential that adults stand up for children who are at a safeguarding risk. What else do you think OP should ignore because you don’t think she has the right to protect her DD? (Parental rights are a thing)

She can protect her daughter, but it can't be done at this school. OP is not there 24/7 and the school have already shown they don't care.

JadeSquid · 06/11/2025 17:48

GiantTeddyIsTired · 06/11/2025 15:13

Well, no, because some of them are female for a start.

But that's also not what she said (although it's interesting that that's where you went with what she said)

She said that men with sexual kinks aren't always honest about their motives.

Just like for instance, if you asked a kid with football and a guilty look if they'd smashed the window, they might say no. Doesn't mean all kids with footballs lie, just means kids with guilty looks and footballs next to broken windows, on the balance of, probability, are likely lying

What have men with sexual kinks got to do with trans people?

RoostingHens · 06/11/2025 17:48

dizzydizzydizzy · 06/11/2025 17:25

I can’t see that an occasional trans woman is going to confuse secondary school kids any more than it confuses adults.

Men who identify as women seems to confuse an awful lot of adults.

JadeSquid · 06/11/2025 17:51

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Can you explain what you mean by this? Are you saying that you think I have a penis or am a trans woman because I don't agree with you? Please don't mince your words. Be proud of them. Are you accusing me of being a man because I have different views to you? Is this what the comment is about?

ReallyShortAttentionSpa · 06/11/2025 17:52

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

JadeSquid · 06/11/2025 17:53

Themaghag · 06/11/2025 17:34

Strangely enough, we hear very little from trans identifying women - no outlandish demands, no online abuse, no disruption of womens' - or mens' - events, threats of rape or decapitation. And, since they are women anyway, there's little chance of any fetishistic trouser filth either. So, I wouldn't feel so enraged, but I would still be very reluctant to go along with the wrong title and pronouns as I don't think it's helpful to anyone, least of all impressionable children, to pretend that there are more than two sexes or that gender trumps biological sex.

So because they are quiet and docile, you wouldnt mind giving them some validation?

BreatheAndFocus · 06/11/2025 17:53

The only reason Mr is used for men and Miss / Mrs for women is because society has assigned them that way - they are gender coded in the same way household roles, jobs, clothes, makeup, names and toys are. They have absolutely nothing to do with biological reality of someone's sex.

No, it hasn’t. Society has ‘gender-coded’ the roles associated with Mrs and Mr (eg Mrs Bloggs should do the dishes and the laundry, and Mr. Bloggs should put the rubbish out, be the main wage-earner, do DIY, etc) but the titles Mrs/Miss and Mr are sex-based.

ArabellaSaurus · 06/11/2025 17:54

JadeSquid · 06/11/2025 17:48

What have men with sexual kinks got to do with trans people?

I posted the link upthread, to the manual the NHS use to diagnose gender incongruence.

This diagnosis requires excluding fetishistic transvestism.

MrsOvertonsWindow · 06/11/2025 17:55

GreyPearlSatin · 06/11/2025 17:39

You missed the point I was making.

What I am saying is that it's not up to OP to tell their child they must stand up for themselves in this instance.

And, yes, OP could go to the school and kick up a fuss, but that is still not standing up for yourself. It might at best be standing up for your child, but since OP is not going to be their 24/7, there is a risk the school will take it out on the child like some schools do with "difficult parents". It shouldn't happen, but sometimes it does and it is something to consider before deciding.

Yes - your points are very clear. Parents shouldn't encourage their children to be assertive and speak up for themselves and shouldn't go into school to discuss concerns in case bullying transactivist teachers may subsequently bully their children.

I am simply pointing out that it is this (well founded) fear of reprisals that has allowed extreme transgender beliefs to be foisted on children. Hence the excessive number of teenage girls (and some boys) who've been caught up in all this and now seek to mutilate their bodies and render themselves infertile because some (not all) schools have allowed trans ideology to run amok. Of course much of the social contagion exists online and out of schools, but there's a reason so many trans lobby groups and individuals made a beeline for education, children in care of the state and children's charities. They've earned a lot of money from "training" schools and children in trans ideology and enforcing the belief that children's bodies can be flawed but a sex change can be the cure.

It's parents speaking up about this and holding schools to account for how they've pushed this at children that's starting to have an impact in stopping this gaslighting of children in schools.

JadeSquid · 06/11/2025 17:56

TheHereticalOne · 06/11/2025 17:24

Well quite.

As men, transwomen could be expected to retain a male pattern criminality because they remain male, regardless of their personal feelings about themselves (or 'identity', as you will) and anything they choose to do in response.

Which means that when prison population statistics show that transwomen have a far greater propensity to sexual violence even than men, something else is going on.

Either, declaring oneself trans itself causes greater deviance (and I'm with you, I think that is unlikely), or males who already have a propensity are more likely to genuinely consider themselves trans, or males with that propensity are more likely to cynically claim that identity to game the system in some way - either for an easier incarceration, or as a way to access victims.

And if it's the latter, on what basis do you separate out the cynical pretender from the true believers?

Given that the criteria for being trans - and thr demand that everyone respect them by acting as thought they are the opposite sex to the one they are - is nothing more than an individual say-so, I don't think you can.

"or males who already have a propensity are more likely to genuinely consider themselves trans"

No this maths if yours isnt mathing. Most trans women arent in jail and have never been to jail.

RoostingHens · 06/11/2025 17:56

Themaghag · 06/11/2025 17:34

Strangely enough, we hear very little from trans identifying women - no outlandish demands, no online abuse, no disruption of womens' - or mens' - events, threats of rape or decapitation. And, since they are women anyway, there's little chance of any fetishistic trouser filth either. So, I wouldn't feel so enraged, but I would still be very reluctant to go along with the wrong title and pronouns as I don't think it's helpful to anyone, least of all impressionable children, to pretend that there are more than two sexes or that gender trumps biological sex.

I wouldn’t be so sure about that. Stephen Whittle has done a lot of harm with her Transactivist demands, often behind closed doors.

RoostingHens · 06/11/2025 17:58

OneCraftyMentor · 06/11/2025 17:17

I think that means here that the school as employers has a particular responsibility to protect them from discrimination and harassment including from children?

No PP clarified, the teacher has a responsibility not to discriminate against children in his classroom. There is no reciprocal requirement under the act to require children not to discriminate against him.

AgnesX · 06/11/2025 17:59

It's a school, call the teacher Ms if that's what they want. Consider it the same as John, Tom, Sue, whatever.

It's not asking anyone to change their beliefs it's just a title or a name.

On a separate note it would helpful if the pupils focused on what they're being taught. The teacher might actually be good at their job. Controversial I know......

TheKeatingFive · 06/11/2025 18:01

AgnesX · 06/11/2025 17:59

It's a school, call the teacher Ms if that's what they want. Consider it the same as John, Tom, Sue, whatever.

It's not asking anyone to change their beliefs it's just a title or a name.

On a separate note it would helpful if the pupils focused on what they're being taught. The teacher might actually be good at their job. Controversial I know......

Why distract the children with this kind of nonsense though? They are there to be taught. Not affirm 'gender identities'. Why are we making that their responsibility?

BustyLaRoux · 06/11/2025 18:02

I think your DD is being stubborn and I think we should use whatever name we like. I say that as someone who doesn’t believe someone can change their sex. I also don’t think single sex spaces should be up for grabs. Women only means women only. We shouldn’t need to defend that and tie ourselves in knots having to specify what makes someone a woman. I have every sympathy with Sandie Peggy and the Darlington nurses.

However I also think if some wants to be called Ms Smith or anything else as patently ridiculous then so be it. People should be able to take whichever monicker they like. Because I call someone Ms Smith, doesn’t mean I agree they are a woman. I may even refuse to refer to this teacher as she. Or “they” for that matter. I would deliberately call them Ms Smith every single time either directly to ms smith or about ms smith. (You know like the yes/no game where you don’t want to be tripped into saying yes or no. So you opt for “I do” or “I would not”. So for me it would be “ms smith did say that” or “it belongs to ms smith”. Never “she said that” or “it’s hers”. I would even make it pretty obvious this was my Fuck You!!!!)

But as for the name, I think we all have the right to be called whatever we want. I may even go to work tomorrow and insist they call me BustyLaRoux instead of my normal name. They can laugh behind my back (or most likely to me face), but it is my right to have the name I want.

Perhaps the compromise for your DD is that she will use the name (ms smith) but will not be coerced into referring to said teacher as she/her. That is the bit the teacher and school cannot make her say if she doesn’t want to. Besides if she just always uses “ms smith” instead of she/her, it is not incorrect. But your DD will know she has made her stand and they will also know it, but they can’t reprimand her for it as it is what the teacher has asked to be called.

GeneralPeter · 06/11/2025 18:02

JadeSquid · 06/11/2025 17:48

What have men with sexual kinks got to do with trans people?

I don’t know, it’s a good question. There is some data suggesting that paraphilias cluster, including cross-dressing.

Personally I’m not bothered by paraphilias that aren’t harmful. I do care about harmful paraphilias though.

Out of 245 trans offenders in the UK prison system on 31 March 2024, 151 were convicted of a sexual offence. That’s a startlingly high share.

What do you think the link is?

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread