This isn't going to be well-structured, I'm thinking into a text box.
The thread subject reminded me of KJK saying on TwiX that "right wing women are women".
KJK is pretty far to the right and has platformed Black women at her Let Women Speak rallies, even putting her arm around one after she'd spoken about something nasty that had happened to her. This isn't the action of a racist. The oh-so-racist Tory party have had Black and brown people in top positions. This isn't the action of a racist party leadership.
The OP mentioned US women. Is a strong association between racism and political "right" perhaps a US thing? Let's assume that it might be, because we've heard of the KKK and Proud Boys. But then we know that Reform politicians aren't exactly politically-correct, so we can't discount that link here.
Dworkin observed that right wing men and left wing men agree that women are property and merely disagree as to the type of property: public or private.
During November 2024, in two US states, voters voted to enshrine abortion access in the state constitution on the same ballot paper that they voted for Trump. Some blue states also voted abortion access into their constitution. This tells us that at least some men on both left and right respect women sufficiently to protect our rights to control our pregnancy outcomes. Dworkin's observation is, tediously, qualified with NAMALT.
Our latest community disruptor has demonstrated that some people regard Black and brown people as exploitable resources, in this case, for sex. This made me look again and see a pattern in how the left treats Black and brown people. And I realised something I hadn't seen before.
The left likes special DEI groups like workplace race equality networks, affinity groups within political parties, etc. These aren't inherently bad, because it can be nice to have organising space away from people who Don't Get It. However, it's dawning on me now that these groups can abused as a way of corralling people so that you don't have to listen to them whilst still pretending that you are listening to get the good optics and ally points, and you can carry on with your mostly white leadership and mostly-white conference making the decisions. If you've seen Brassed Off, you'll remember the scene where Gloria submits her report and realises that it was a tickbox exercise and no one will even read it: the "listening exercises" and written submissions from the race equality focus groups can be, and are, ignored the same way.
I'm realising that left wing and right wing white people can both consider exploit Black and brown people as property, in the Marxist sense of property as an "exploitable resource". The right wing historically saw Black and brown people as literal private property via chattel slavery, and more recently mean low-paid workers working for your company or cleaning your home. The left wing treat Black and brown people as public property to exploit in a more impersonal looking way, by virtue-signalling and tokenism to get union dues and votes, but not put into leadership roles where they might have an actual say. And, just like with Dworkin's observation about women, this is qualified with NAWPALT. The Tory party wouldn't have put Kemi and Rishi into the top job and made Suella Home Secretary, and Labour wouldn't have made Shabana Home Secretary, if all white people were like that.
So, relevantly to the thread topic: yes, some right wing women are racist, so are some left wing women, and that's because racism is a problem across the whole political spectrum that manifests differently between left and right.