Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

A Question of Some Considerable Delicacy

1000 replies

theilltemperedmaggotintheheartofthelaw · 24/10/2025 21:43

Ever since FWS, we've been told by TRAs that the country is awash with transwomen who are heartbroken and terrified because they've been told to stop using women's facilities, and this has outed them to their colleagues.

I'm finding this hard to believe, because I have virtually never mistaken a transwoman for a woman. There have been previous threads about this, from which I gather that the scientific consensus is that humans are very good at sexing other humans from an early age.

Maybe I am just wrong, though, and have been fooled many times. And maybe some people aren't very perceptive. According to a recent thread, Morgane Oger thinks he could only accurately sex about 70% of a mixed crowd; a PP on the same thread thinks Maya Forstater looks like a man.

So I would like to hear other people's experiences of this (please try not to insult or offend!). Were you ever surprised, when a woman turned out to be a man?

This piece about Kelly v Leonardo reveals the mindset:

https://www.lgbtqnation.com/2025/10/terf-employee-admits-to-secret-cis-only-bathroom-at-work-i-wont-sacrifice-my-privacy-my-dignity/

Kelly also admitted to speculating over her colleagues’ gender identities and tracking their bathroom usage, telling the tribunal that over a period of six to nine months, she identified three people she believed to be trans who were using the women’s restrooms.

This seems to misrepresent what was happening. MK was not speculating: she knew that they were men, surely?

I'm interested primarily in what this means for the law, in particular in relation to Article 8 ECHR (right to private life). TRAs interpret this as an unlimited right to conceal one's sex in every situation. But how can even a limited such right exist, if there is no way in reality that such concealment can reliably be achieved, from everyone, all of the time?

Are they actually demanding the right to force everyone to pretend to be fooled? That's not a privacy right.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
30
Namelessnelly · 25/10/2025 09:09

Mamma246 · 25/10/2025 09:04

yes they do.

What is the issue with men in women’s spaces? Because it doesn’t sound like a trans issue?

Exactly It’s nit a trans issue. It’s a male entitlement issue. Men believing if they claim to be women they get access to female spaces. Their make sense of entitlement and lack of concern for women shows they’re as much women as im a space hopping unicorn.

INeedAPensieve · 25/10/2025 09:10

KnottyAuty · 24/10/2025 23:04

When out and about my shorthand way of spotting them is to look at anyone dressed in a feminine style of around 6ft. On an outing in town, I'll see at least a couple of TIMs now that I am looking in this way. I'd say I am mostly seeing males in their 20s-30s. Often they are very feminised and well presented/spending a lot on hair/grooming etc but they still are obviously men. It's not just the gait, hands, jaw, height etc etc It's that there's something of a "performance" about the presentation. A lot of looking around to see who else is looking? I'm not sure what I mean, but I've never seen a woman do it unless she is up to something or on the stage.

This is exactly right and I notice this too. Exaggerated hair flicks (as if womanhood is the herbal essences advert to them) and yes, the size, the gait, the way they walk. It's so so obvious in real life. And I do admit to having been fooled by a couple of pictures online. It's amazing what a filter can do.

Unfortunately for them, it just isn't possible in real life. Also women (us, the real kind) can correctly sex humans even accurately than men. We notice quicker. It's to do with our instincts to do with protecting ourselves, I always notice quicker than my DH does, but when I quietly point it out he can then notice and say oh yes, I see now.

There's a TiM at one of our local cinemas, doesn't wear really sexualised clothing (probably because there's a dress code) or anything but very, very clearly male. Extremely deep voice, huge hands, not as tall as my DH but well built. Pleasant to engage with but I'd still not want him using the women's toilets. I've not encountered it yet but would be uncomfortable if I did. He's so young as well, early 20s I'd say, maybe younger. This ideology has captured a whole generation. The girls come off worst I think though (as usual). They are the ones I've read that tend to follow through with the extreme surgery etc.

Theeyeballsinthesky · 25/10/2025 09:10

Mamma246 · 25/10/2025 09:04

yes they do.

What is the issue with men in women’s spaces? Because it doesn’t sound like a trans issue?

Errrr it's because TW are men so of course it's a men's issue

TheKeatingFive · 25/10/2025 09:12

Imdunfer · 25/10/2025 09:03

Always comes back to the same point, these threads, don't they?

"I know I have never shared a loo with a male bodied person because I've never knowingly shared a loo with a male bodied person."

I don't think women should share changing rooms with people who obviously have a male physiology, because of the sheer number who are either traumatised by that or prevented from doing so by their culture.

But where that leaves us with those who are not obviously male bodied I don't know. I've been challenged many times as a tall woman with very broad shoulders and short hair. It doesn't worry me, I just reassure them I'm female.

It wouldn't be acceptable or practical to demand that people strip. So like it or not I'm afraid we have to accept that some people with testicles will be in ladies loos. As long as they aren't obvious, the balance of harm has to be that they carry on doing that. Because I've no intention of dropping my pants to show I'm female for anyone!

No one is asking you to drop your pants 🙄

If there is any doubt at all, the individuals voice gives it away immediately.

ProfoundlyPeculiarAndWeird · 25/10/2025 09:12

I really REALLY wish the focus wasn't so much on toilets. The Supreme Court case was brought in relation to concerns about women's representation on public boards being undermined by an erasure of sex in law. And, more generally, about the very pervasive possible policy effects of such an erasure.

The toilet issue seems to have become an enormous, enormous distraction .

Imdunfer · 25/10/2025 09:12

AMansAManForAllThat · 25/10/2025 09:09

Not at all demeaning. Many bits of my anatomy don’t work as they should. It doesn’t change what they are. Is it demeaning to men with ED to mention that dicks evolved to get hard? Is it demeaning to the celibate to say that people have sex? Is it demeaning to someone with diabetes to say that the pancreas produces insulin?

There are many men with ED who would find it extremely upsetting to have it pointed out to them that dicks were evolved to get hard and find it very demeaning.

I can't believe you don't realise that.

TheKeatingFive · 25/10/2025 09:12

Does anyone have an example of a transwomen in the public eye that they think passes? Out of interest?

Helleofabore · 25/10/2025 09:13

SleeplessIntheOnyxNight · 25/10/2025 09:03

As one of those women I would say - not very. I still have a different pelvis from my Husband (and every other man) and I can conceive children and then have healthy babies via cesarean. Trans women can ‘pass’ or not pass but when future generations dig up their bodies they will say ‘this is a male skeleton’ because it will be.

I am also one of those women too.

And I have female q angles and hip placement. Just because one aspect of a female body lies outside the average range, doesn’t mean enough of that person’s body cues are not very quickly and intuitively discernible as female body cues.

Yet we have just been leveraged in some people’s proof that our bodies defy our correct sex being able to be identified. It is quite something to see, isn’t it?

Mamma246 · 25/10/2025 09:13

Namelessnelly · 25/10/2025 09:09

Exactly It’s nit a trans issue. It’s a male entitlement issue. Men believing if they claim to be women they get access to female spaces. Their make sense of entitlement and lack of concern for women shows they’re as much women as im a space hopping unicorn.

The whole world is built to men’s convenience. Why would they feel the need to dress up as women, take hormones or go through painful surgery rather than just force their way into our spaces like they always have? That’s the issue isn’t it.

Namelessnelly · 25/10/2025 09:15

Mamma246 · 25/10/2025 09:13

The whole world is built to men’s convenience. Why would they feel the need to dress up as women, take hormones or go through painful surgery rather than just force their way into our spaces like they always have? That’s the issue isn’t it.

Edited

Ummm it’s a word beginning with f and ends in ish thst we’re not allowed to say on here. So what’s the difference between a man wearing a dress forcing his way into women’s spaces and one not wearing a dress? They’re both men right? Are we supposed to let the one with a dress on in? Why?

MagicLoop · 25/10/2025 09:15

Mamma246 · 25/10/2025 08:58

Yes that’s exactly what people have been trying to do though. For example, why do our shops close early on Sundays? Christianity. You have to abide by the opening times. Therefore, other people’s belief systems are factored into your life whether you believe it or not. Do you really think that religion is not that pervasive? And if it is a case of ‘they believe it but I don’t and that’s ok’, why can’t you do that about trans people?

Or is this about men in women’s spaces?

Did you not read the post you quoted? It was about compelled belief. Having (partial) Sunday opening hours is not the same as forcing people to believe in the contents of the bible. Yes, christian traditions and institutions are (unfortunately) still pervasive in some areas of UK life, but it's not even the norm to be a practising christian, never mind compulsory! Not being able to go to Sainsbury's after 4pm on a Sunday does not mean I have to believe in god.

TheKeatingFive · 25/10/2025 09:15

Mamma246 · 25/10/2025 09:13

The whole world is built to men’s convenience. Why would they feel the need to dress up as women, take hormones or go through painful surgery rather than just force their way into our spaces like they always have? That’s the issue isn’t it.

Edited

But they don't have to do any of those things to access women's spaces. All they have to say is 'I identify as a woman' and then women aren't allowed to express their concerns as that's transphobic.

Namelessnelly · 25/10/2025 09:17

Imdunfer · 25/10/2025 09:12

There are many men with ED who would find it extremely upsetting to have it pointed out to them that dicks were evolved to get hard and find it very demeaning.

I can't believe you don't realise that.

And yet did you know they found a cure for ED before they found a cure for endometriosis. Funny that isn’t it?

AMansAManForAllThat · 25/10/2025 09:17

Imdunfer · 25/10/2025 09:12

There are many men with ED who would find it extremely upsetting to have it pointed out to them that dicks were evolved to get hard and find it very demeaning.

I can't believe you don't realise that.

We’re not talking about one man with ED, we’re talking about diagrams that show that dicks get hard. Like the diagram that shows men’s pelvis’s are different from women’s because of the birth process.

It’s not about individual function. I can’t believe you don’t realise that. Hard of thinking, perhaps.

Helleofabore · 25/10/2025 09:18

ProfoundlyPeculiarAndWeird · 25/10/2025 09:12

I really REALLY wish the focus wasn't so much on toilets. The Supreme Court case was brought in relation to concerns about women's representation on public boards being undermined by an erasure of sex in law. And, more generally, about the very pervasive possible policy effects of such an erasure.

The toilet issue seems to have become an enormous, enormous distraction .

I look at it as one of the issues that people think about because it is an everyday impact.

Plus, if toilets are not part of securing of protection for women and girls in the current discussions, when will we be able to secure female single sex toilets?

Imdunfer · 25/10/2025 09:18

Let's suspend disbelief for a moment and accept that some of you can 100% identify males.

You're in the loos. You spot one who isn't outwardly obvious. You challenge them. They refuse to accept your challenge and carry on quietly using a cubicle and washing their hands.

What are you going to do?

Demand they strip?
Call the police?
Use your martial arts training to eject them?

Is there any practical solution you can suggest?

Mamma246 · 25/10/2025 09:18

MagicLoop · 25/10/2025 09:15

Did you not read the post you quoted? It was about compelled belief. Having (partial) Sunday opening hours is not the same as forcing people to believe in the contents of the bible. Yes, christian traditions and institutions are (unfortunately) still pervasive in some areas of UK life, but it's not even the norm to be a practising christian, never mind compulsory! Not being able to go to Sainsbury's after 4pm on a Sunday does not mean I have to believe in god.

No- you’ve completely misunderstood. Where do gender ideals even come from?

Mamma246 · 25/10/2025 09:19

TheKeatingFive · 25/10/2025 09:15

But they don't have to do any of those things to access women's spaces. All they have to say is 'I identify as a woman' and then women aren't allowed to express their concerns as that's transphobic.

But why would they even bother doing that? And why is trans men occupying men’s spaces not an issue being discussed?

Namelessnelly · 25/10/2025 09:20

Imdunfer · 25/10/2025 09:18

Let's suspend disbelief for a moment and accept that some of you can 100% identify males.

You're in the loos. You spot one who isn't outwardly obvious. You challenge them. They refuse to accept your challenge and carry on quietly using a cubicle and washing their hands.

What are you going to do?

Demand they strip?
Call the police?
Use your martial arts training to eject them?

Is there any practical solution you can suggest?

Edited

Call the police, scream and announce very loudly there’s a man in there. I now give no fucks. I will make a scene. They want to be a criminal, let’s treat them like one.

ninjahamster · 25/10/2025 09:21

Namelessnelly · 25/10/2025 09:07

They should be happy. I’m glad. But they cannot use the soaces not designated for their biological sex. They chose to transition. If they are upset with then having to follow the law, that’s their problem.

Which he did, he used the ladies as dictated by his born sex.

TheKeatingFive · 25/10/2025 09:21

Mamma246 · 25/10/2025 09:19

But why would they even bother doing that? And why is trans men occupying men’s spaces not an issue being discussed?

Its no bother at all and they get to shut down women's concerns. Unfortunately that is plenty motivation enough for some men.

Mamma246 · 25/10/2025 09:21

Namelessnelly · 25/10/2025 09:15

Ummm it’s a word beginning with f and ends in ish thst we’re not allowed to say on here. So what’s the difference between a man wearing a dress forcing his way into women’s spaces and one not wearing a dress? They’re both men right? Are we supposed to let the one with a dress on in? Why?

Have you ever used unisex toilets?

5128gap · 25/10/2025 09:22

CornedBeef451 · 25/10/2025 08:55

I had an odd experience in a work’s lgbt awareness training session where the presenter made an off hand comment about how would you even know they’re trans?

It was odd because he was a trans identified man and I’d clocked him straight away, no hesitation. It was over Teams but even so, the voice, face and then attitude once he got started, all very obvious.

There was also a trans identified woman. I noticed her straight away because of the wispy neck beard but as she wasn’t a presenter it took slightly longer. In that case again it was the voice and face, plus mannerisms.

I wasn’t sure if I was supposed to act surprised when they outed themselves but it definitely wasn’t a surprise.

There is also a trans identified woman in our local opticians. I was slightly confused to start with as in the first 5 seconds she passed as a teenage boy but as soon as she spoke and then walked away the voice, hips and waist made it obvious.

I think there’s a large amount of self delusion amongst trans identified people. Perhaps there’s hoards of them around me all times and I just haven’t noticed but it seems highly unlikely.

I don't think there can be. Because they are only 1% of the population and most of us see as many as we would expect to see given the statistical likelihood. If there were hoardes of others in addition to those we see, the percentage of the population they comprise would surely be greater than 1.

Namelessnelly · 25/10/2025 09:23

Mamma246 · 25/10/2025 09:18

No- you’ve completely misunderstood. Where do gender ideals even come from?

The patriarchy. Do keep up dear. And as for the female identified trans in men’s spaces, you’ll find a lot of trabs identified females still use female spaces. Or unisex. Because they’d be scared to use the men’s. If men feel uncomfortable with females using their spaces, that’s on them to deal with.

ThatBlackCat · 25/10/2025 09:24

Imdunfer · 25/10/2025 08:44

Here we go again!

All the measurement charts are for averages.

There is huge overlap in male and female anatomy (but emphatically not in testosterone).

There will always be women stronger/taller/narrower hipped etc etc etc than the weakest/shortest/widest hipped etc etc males.

This defining of women by the standard of an average woman is demeaning to the many who don't match the standard.

There really is not a "huge" overlap between males and females. There really, really is not.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.