Most mornings, I really want to head down to see to my allotment, which gives me such joy, as I used to until last year. But sadly I don't feel safe to do so, as another allotment holder assaulted me there a year ago (grabbed hold of me a number of times and said he could do 'anything he liked to me' because I was alone). I managed to get away from him before anything worse happened and reported it to the police but because it took me more than six months to tell them (due to the fact I didn't believe they'd do anything about it), they said they couldn't take action. So now I don't go down there alone any more, miss the morning sunshine which gives me such joy and a precious lifeline of exercise and satisfaction. This is genuinely being afraid to go out to do something I love, having to alter my life to my detriment because of the behaviour of a man.
And it's not uncommon - in fact, the opposite. Most women reading this will have experienced something similar – made a decision to go without because of a fear of male behaviour. Indeed, many will have far, far worse experiences at the hands of men.
Does Rachel Taylor just accept that as part of life... something not worthy of comment? Does she recognise the gross insensitivity of what she's saying? Men do not have to change their behaviour, change their lives, as women do, to avoid male violence. If the man who assaulted me decided tomorrow that he wanted to 'live as a woman', he'd still be a strapping big bloke, capable of overpowering me, and I'd still be a five foot two woman who would struggle (and probably fail) to fight him off.
I accept there may be some TIMs who feel nervous about using men's facilities, but if that's true then they need to start a campaign to get their own (as many have said down the years). Not pass on that fear to women.