Help end medical misogyny. Sign our petition.

Help end medical misogyny.
Sign our petition.

Sign the petition

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions
OP posts:
Thread gallery
33
nomas · 11/09/2025 20:02

Ereshkigalangcleg · 11/09/2025 19:59

It’s fascinating how people haven’t understood that this is bigger than just Charlie Kirk’s murder. It’s also fascinating how brutal murder appears to be fine for the morally superior if you’ve said bad things, and that people pointing out the wrongness of that are apparently the ones in the wrong.

We know on this board and have ample evidence that many of the activist men on the left, both the ones who “identify as women” and the bog standard violent misogynists, think ordinary women like us (and particularly prominent women like JKR, Rosie Duffield, Helen Joyce) who don’t believe in gender identity ideology justify violence against us for our refusal to concede and our campaigns for our rights. And that’s why we’re worried that this is going to end up in indiscriminate bloodshed, with some little shit killing a woman for objecting to “trans rights” (demands). This is the feminist board and it’s largely why so many of us are calling this out.

No one has said the brutal murder is fine.

The people who will bear the brunt of this will be school kids and ethnic minorities in the US.

I am dreading the 'revenge'.

FuckOffWithYourEllipses · 11/09/2025 20:03

BettyBooper · 11/09/2025 19:52

Well he definitely deserved to be shot then.

Seriously?

I never said he “deserved” anything.

What I said, and what still stands, is that it’s remarkable how little curiosity there is about his white supremacist campaigning.

nomas · 11/09/2025 20:04

FuckOffWithYourEllipses · 11/09/2025 20:03

I never said he “deserved” anything.

What I said, and what still stands, is that it’s remarkable how little curiosity there is about his white supremacist campaigning.

The martyr machine is in overdrive.

But they don't even need a martyr, there are a dozen Charlie Kirks waiting to step into his shoes.

OtherS · 11/09/2025 20:06

I'd never heard of him. He seems to have spouted some absolutely revolting opinions, and I'm horrified that someone with views like his was apparently celebrated. But the fact that people are cheering his assassination, let alone calling for further attacks, is genuinely terrifying. Would they be as happy if Jeremey Corbyn was murdered by someone who disliked his opinions? Greta Thunberg? Obama? JKR? As this is what they are arguing for, people to be murdered at will by anyone who dislikes what they have to say. Who in their right mind would think this would be a good thing?!

RedToothBrush · 11/09/2025 20:06

TheJoyOfWriting · 11/09/2025 19:57

What dodgy things do you mean? He was a horrible husband ofc. Are you a Marilyn Monroe murder theorist? I have suspicions myself.

He did get the US more heavily into Vietnam. What else?

You are asking me to go back on this and I've genuinely forgotten more than I remember but I did an essay on the image of JFK about thirty years ago and whether it was overly favourable. It was sourced from proper text books and everything - nothing about Marilyn. He was mixed up in stuff he shouldn't be, he would have aged, he was a womanising prick and I concluded he has definitely been given an easy ride by history because he embodied a moment in time and a positive era rather than because he did masses of good stuff. A lot of things which were done in his name were done after he died and not by him.

If I could actually remember any of it, i'd share but honestly I remember the sum total of fuck all but I still have the books!

Still, it got good marks!

TheJoyOfWriting · 11/09/2025 20:07

Whoiam · 11/09/2025 19:58

It’s wild how, in today’s world, if someone doesn’t agree with your views, they’re instantly labelled a bigot or a racist. Yet Charlie never carried himself that way. He was wholly respectful and loving, even to those who opposed him, no matter how hostile or unreasonable they seemed. That’s something I always want to highlight: this is absolutely spiritual.
Charlie was a godly man who loved Christ. He called out the madness of the age and stood firm for the long-lost normalcy of the world. Personally, I don’t believe this was random. Given the distance, the precision, and the single shot, it feels more like a professional job. The likelihood, in my view, is that Charlie had a future of real influence, perhaps even running for president one day. He was a man of faith who would not be compromised.
I don’t think this was just some random “nut” with opposing beliefs. Most who disagreed with Charlie would never have had the courage to act on it. I believe this went deeper. As the Bible says, those in darkness will hate the light.

How is it respectful and loving to say that women on the Pill are automatically 'crazy and bitter?

Or that women over 30 are by default 'past their prime' and understandably men wouldn't be interested? (Tho hypocritically he married a 32yo)

Or the wild accusations that Michelle Obama& those other women are stupid & only got where they are bc they are black?

And do you think it's 'loving and respectful' to say that stoning men to death for having gay sex is 'God's perfect law'?

Unless maybe you see stoning for gay sex as 'standing up for long-lost normalcy against madness'..?

Is that all 'godly' and 'spiritual' to you?

AMansAManForAllThat · 11/09/2025 20:08

FuckOffWithYourEllipses · 11/09/2025 19:48

It’s fascinating to see the way posters on this thread seem to take issue only with his views on abortion rights and whether women are old at age 30+

His white supremacist rhetoric has been waved away as though it’s background noise.

And when his racism IS brought up, the pattern seems to be: demand “proof,” get the proof, then pretend it doesn’t exist.

If nasty comments about his death spark more outrage here than his white supremacist campaigning then that says everything about where the priorities lie.

I was unaware of this man before his death. I’m still learning about what he said. I suspect I’d have been outraged about most of it including any racism. I am still outraged at his death.

Killing people who are wrong, who we disagree with, who we disapprove of… is still always wrong.

Whatever he said could not be worse than what his murderer did.

Ereshkigalangcleg · 11/09/2025 20:09

FuckOffWithYourEllipses · 11/09/2025 20:03

I never said he “deserved” anything.

What I said, and what still stands, is that it’s remarkable how little curiosity there is about his white supremacist campaigning.

That’s not really what the thread is about. If you want to argue with his supporters and have people justify his actions, you’ll have to go on Truth Social or something, because here there are just people who don’t agree with or justify violence in any circumstances, and don’t make light of people being murdered or act smug about it. That’s all that’s important to me and many others on the thread in this instance.

Ereshkigalangcleg · 11/09/2025 20:10

OtherS · 11/09/2025 20:06

I'd never heard of him. He seems to have spouted some absolutely revolting opinions, and I'm horrified that someone with views like his was apparently celebrated. But the fact that people are cheering his assassination, let alone calling for further attacks, is genuinely terrifying. Would they be as happy if Jeremey Corbyn was murdered by someone who disliked his opinions? Greta Thunberg? Obama? JKR? As this is what they are arguing for, people to be murdered at will by anyone who dislikes what they have to say. Who in their right mind would think this would be a good thing?!

This.

nomas · 11/09/2025 20:11

OtherS · 11/09/2025 20:06

I'd never heard of him. He seems to have spouted some absolutely revolting opinions, and I'm horrified that someone with views like his was apparently celebrated. But the fact that people are cheering his assassination, let alone calling for further attacks, is genuinely terrifying. Would they be as happy if Jeremey Corbyn was murdered by someone who disliked his opinions? Greta Thunberg? Obama? JKR? As this is what they are arguing for, people to be murdered at will by anyone who dislikes what they have to say. Who in their right mind would think this would be a good thing?!

No one here thinks it's a good thing. I wouldn't even go on X/FB for opinions, nothing rational there.

Ereshkigalangcleg · 11/09/2025 20:12

nomas · 11/09/2025 20:11

No one here thinks it's a good thing. I wouldn't even go on X/FB for opinions, nothing rational there.

It’s BlueSky that this is happening on. The left leaning morally superior platform.

nomas · 11/09/2025 20:12

Ereshkigalangcleg · 11/09/2025 20:09

That’s not really what the thread is about. If you want to argue with his supporters and have people justify his actions, you’ll have to go on Truth Social or something, because here there are just people who don’t agree with or justify violence in any circumstances, and don’t make light of people being murdered or act smug about it. That’s all that’s important to me and many others on the thread in this instance.

It's not for you to say what the thread is about. I thought she made an interesting point

nomas · 11/09/2025 20:13

Ereshkigalangcleg · 11/09/2025 20:12

It’s BlueSky that this is happening on. The left leaning morally superior platform.

So what does that have to do with here?

Livelovebehappy · 11/09/2025 20:13

nomas · 11/09/2025 20:02

No one has said the brutal murder is fine.

The people who will bear the brunt of this will be school kids and ethnic minorities in the US.

I am dreading the 'revenge'.

Why would you think there will be ‘revenge’? It’s the left who like to cancel people out who have different opinions to their own. I’m very doubtful that there’s going to be revenge against children and ethnic minorities. You’re just hyperboling….

Ereshkigalangcleg · 11/09/2025 20:13

I’m sure you did. My point still stands.

Ereshkigalangcleg · 11/09/2025 20:15

nomas · 11/09/2025 20:13

So what does that have to do with here?

It’s social media for the righteous people 🙄 it was you who tried to claim the only problem is with X and FB.

nomas · 11/09/2025 20:16

Livelovebehappy · 11/09/2025 20:13

Why would you think there will be ‘revenge’? It’s the left who like to cancel people out who have different opinions to their own. I’m very doubtful that there’s going to be revenge against children and ethnic minorities. You’re just hyperboling….

There are some extreme views being shared, which will likely lead to more violence:

  • Donald Trump blamed “radical left political violence,” saying it’s responsible not only for Kirk’s death but also other recent attacks.
  • Laura Loomer, a conservative activist, called for the Trump administration to “shut down, defund, & prosecute every single Leftist organization,” labeling the left a “national security threat”.
  • Elon Musk posted to his 225 million followers: “The Left is the party of murder”.
  • Rep. Nancy Mace and others in Congress echoed similar sentiments, with some shouting “You all caused this” during a moment of silence for Kirk.
  • The phrase “This is war” has been used repeatedly by right-wing influencers, suggesting a shift toward more aggressive political confrontation.
nomas · 11/09/2025 20:18

Ereshkigalangcleg · 11/09/2025 20:15

It’s social media for the righteous people 🙄 it was you who tried to claim the only problem is with X and FB.

Where did I claim that?

I can't speak about platforms I've never been on.

BettyBooper · 11/09/2025 20:18

Dannydevitoiloveyourart · 11/09/2025 20:00

Of course not- but people’s lives have been made significantly worse by his views. Easy enough to dismiss from across the pond, but the reality is that the U.S. is in turmoil. Many are living with the consequences: loss of access to healthcare, overt racism, deportations of friends and family, denial of abortion rights, loss of jobs and business, poverty, and more.

In a country where you can purchase a gun in a supermarket, it’s sadly no surprise that political figures are being targeted for promoting the very views that have caused such hardship. The violence is wrong- but it is also entirely predictable when people feel hopeless and powerless. As I’ve said before, political extremism is never a victimless position, and yet again someone has lost their life because of a failure to recognise that truth.

Of course not- but

My husband is American and a Democrat. He equally is against violence and this murder.

You have your opinion. But it doesn't mean that others should not have theirs.

You are assuming your opinion is right. Many across the pond would not agree. Which is why debate is needed.

nomas · 11/09/2025 20:20

BettyBooper · 11/09/2025 20:18

Of course not- but

My husband is American and a Democrat. He equally is against violence and this murder.

You have your opinion. But it doesn't mean that others should not have theirs.

You are assuming your opinion is right. Many across the pond would not agree. Which is why debate is needed.

Which bit of what she said was wrong?

TheCatsTongue · 11/09/2025 20:21

The trouble with the modern left is the belief that they are on the "right side of history" and that no matter how revolting they are they have history on their side, until they don't.

People like Glinner, JKR, KJK were very much in the left until they fell out over the trans issue, and then suddenly they became abhorrent people.

The people here justifying this guy's murder will find that there will be an issue that they believe in that suddenly becomes abhorrent and by their own logic can be justifiably murdered for it. Be careful what you wish for.

I notice there's a lot of "don't point fingers" today, because they know they've stoked the hatred and don't want to bear the brunt of what could come next.

Alexandra2001 · 11/09/2025 20:23

nomas · 11/09/2025 20:16

There are some extreme views being shared, which will likely lead to more violence:

  • Donald Trump blamed “radical left political violence,” saying it’s responsible not only for Kirk’s death but also other recent attacks.
  • Laura Loomer, a conservative activist, called for the Trump administration to “shut down, defund, & prosecute every single Leftist organization,” labeling the left a “national security threat”.
  • Elon Musk posted to his 225 million followers: “The Left is the party of murder”.
  • Rep. Nancy Mace and others in Congress echoed similar sentiments, with some shouting “You all caused this” during a moment of silence for Kirk.
  • The phrase “This is war” has been used repeatedly by right-wing influencers, suggesting a shift toward more aggressive political confrontation.

Yes no one yet knows who did it or why he was shot.

Very dangerous to make unsubstantiated allegations against left or right....

..will just lead to further killings.

TheignT · 11/09/2025 20:24

In the clip I saw he was talking about hind not trans anything.

nomas · 11/09/2025 20:24

TheCatsTongue · 11/09/2025 20:21

The trouble with the modern left is the belief that they are on the "right side of history" and that no matter how revolting they are they have history on their side, until they don't.

People like Glinner, JKR, KJK were very much in the left until they fell out over the trans issue, and then suddenly they became abhorrent people.

The people here justifying this guy's murder will find that there will be an issue that they believe in that suddenly becomes abhorrent and by their own logic can be justifiably murdered for it. Be careful what you wish for.

I notice there's a lot of "don't point fingers" today, because they know they've stoked the hatred and don't want to bear the brunt of what could come next.

It's ironic that you use language like 'revolting' and 'abhorrent' about others to show that you're better.

JKR is still a liberal on the left, and she is in no way abhorrent.

Alexandra2001 · 11/09/2025 20:25

TheCatsTongue · 11/09/2025 20:21

The trouble with the modern left is the belief that they are on the "right side of history" and that no matter how revolting they are they have history on their side, until they don't.

People like Glinner, JKR, KJK were very much in the left until they fell out over the trans issue, and then suddenly they became abhorrent people.

The people here justifying this guy's murder will find that there will be an issue that they believe in that suddenly becomes abhorrent and by their own logic can be justifiably murdered for it. Be careful what you wish for.

I notice there's a lot of "don't point fingers" today, because they know they've stoked the hatred and don't want to bear the brunt of what could come next.

You know the far right also commit violence? & always have.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread