I should stress what made me 'peak' was the realisation that behaviour wasn't treated equally: things that would be unacceptable by others is tolerated when it shouldn't be.
We need to get back to unacceptable behaviour being recognised as such rather than people excusing it or tripping over themselves to be polite in the face of unreasonable behaviour because they are more bothered about being smeared as being 'mean' than addressing shit behaviour.
This should be gender identity neutral.
Males in single sex facilities are breaking the law. Why should women tolerate this?
Glinner tweet was qualified in saying doing X and y reasonable action first but if everything else failed it's ok to take steps to protect yourself in whatever way you can if you are failed by authority.
This is essentially fair and reasonable. A court is unlikely to convict you of a crime on this basis. You might be dragged through the legal system (and yeah Peggie Sandie case and Glinners case itself ultimately demonstrate this) but ultimately the law is all about reasonableness and whether you have acted rationally based on the circumstances.
And even if you are convicted, it's going to be amplified by the media as a huge injustice because it's ultimately at odds with the public understanding of reasonableness.
People are overwhelmingly nice and reasonable. All we are seeing is the an awareness of how dominant unreasonableness has become.
MNet ultimately gets this more than most precisely because of the whole trademark premise of am I being unreasonable...