JKR asking similar questions to what I have been asking for years on here.

[DialSquare]

Copied from Nitter

J.K. Rowling@jk_rowling29m
As another man who once worked with me declares himself saddened by my beliefs on gender and sex, I thought it might be useful to compile a list for handy reference. Which of the following do you imagine makes actors and directors who aren’t involved with the HBO reboot of Harry Potter so miserable?

Is it my belief that women and girls should have their own public changing rooms and bathrooms?

That women should retain female-only rape crisis centres?

That men don’t belong in women’s sport?

That female prisoners shouldn’t be incarcerated with violent men and male sex offenders?

That women should remain a protected class in law, because they have sex-specific needs and issues?

That language should reflect reality rather than ideological jargon, especially in a medical context?

That women shouldn’t be harassed, persecuted or fired for refusing to pretend humans can change sex?

That women should not be threatened with violence and rape when they assert their rights?

That freedom of speech and belief are essential to a pluralistic democratic society?

That troubled minors, especially those who are gay, autistic and trauma-experienced, should be given mental health support instead of irreversible surgeries and drug treatments on non-existent evidence of benefit?

That gay people shouldn’t be pressured to include the opposite sex in their dating pools, nor should they be smeared as ‘genital fetishists’ when they don’t?

That cross-dressing heterosexual male fetishists aren’t actually oppressed, but having the time of their lives piggybacking off gender identity ideology?

That said ideology, and the privileged, blinkered fools pushing it because they suffer zero consequences themselves, have done more damage to the political left’s credibility than Trump and Farage could have achieved in a century?

Let me have your thoughts.

This sums up the views of the majority of posters on this board, however, we often have other posters tell us they don’t agree with us, but never what views they don’t actually agree with.

So, those of you that don’t agree with the majority view on here, what is it about the above that you don’t agree with?

Even with your 'data', and I say that loosely, there is zero evidence that transwomen are at increased risk of anything.
Even if they were, male-on-male violence is a male problem and is not a problem for women to solve. Male-on-female violence is a much greater problem.

Tell us you can't read without telling us….

We all know why. Howie is scared of men. And deep down Howie knows it too.

That is why Howie is here. Howie likes bullying women to feel powerful. Howie can't punch up so Howie punches down.

Because if Howie really cared about trans people and was really here to try and convince us, Howie would be discussing and engaging instead of gish-galloping and insulting.

This is how we all know that Howie, despite Howie's pretence, knows very well who the female people (the sex class) are and is very ready to treat them differently to male. Howie's every post drips with it.

Yes, Howie likes to feel powerful, from behind a keyboard on the other side of the world.

Poor little Howie.

Won't

Because it's incel bollocks and guess what, I'll let you into a little secret,

We don't have to do what men tell us to do.

We can think and feel completely independently from men and even tell them to bog off when appropriate too!

Amazing isn't it?

Mate, they're not allowed to use women's 'bathrooms'.

The hypocrisy of attempting to use crime stats to justify unlawful behaviour.

No, it's because the links don't say what you are claiming they do.

Of course not.

We are supposed to be good little girls and do what what we are told.

And the womens hate crime section is where in this report.

And how many sticker offences do you think are included in the official police records?
Lots of forces have told the public that they launched investigations over womens rights stickers because for some reason Womens rights are seen as anti-trans.

But please provide the breakout and details of any which took place in a toilet

Wow. You think that if some men are in danger from other men it's women's job to act as protectors and human shields?

And you're stating this on a feminist forum.

OK then. Explain why, if some men are in danger from other men, why it's 'necessary' for the men who claim they are in danger to use spaces which are supposed to be for women only.

Really?

There's no evidence that letting the same men who keep threatening to rape and murder us for not believing that they are real women into our toilets and changing rooms puts us at risk of harm?

But how can we tell which beardy wanker is male and which beardy wanker is 'female' and therefore "allowed" in the toilets.
It doesn't even protect the 'legal' beardy wankers as a policy precisely because no one can tell which beardy wanker is legit and not legit!
Women are better off letting the beardy wankers sort it out between themselves and have a beardy wanker free zone!
Never mind this conversation always ignores the privacy and dignity element because ironically making it all about 'transwomen being perfectly safe' is an argument that's easier to make than the one about women not wishing to be around all penises.

Seems you can't even tell when they aren’t "beardy wankers"

vox.com/2016/5/18/11690234/women-bathrooms-harassment

There have been reported incidents of transwomen attacking females.

There are NO evidence of the reverse. Transwomen are completely safe.

Transwomen however commit sexual offences against females.

Those links do not show a transwoman assaulted in a male toilet.

We can tell when they are threatening to rape and murder us, and we can read about it in the news when they are actually convicted of assaulting women in female only spaces (Katie Dolatowski and Karen White, to give two examples).

Surely the fact that they keep harming or threatening to harm women is evidence that letting them into our single sex spaces is a risk?

Personally I prefer actual verified facts to "Vox".

I have read the data. It does not show any attacks on transwomen in the male facilities. Yet I have included below actual attacks by transwomen on females in female spaces. So you can't refuse that.

AND, male-on-male violence is NOT female problem to solve.

lol. Women not doing what you say?

Sad times.

The overwhelming problem is that to make the argument that a particular group of men share characteristics with women and should therefore use some services for women, you have to be able to define who those men are.

However, the argument has been that there is no objective way to define this category, which undermines the relevance of any studies, and renders any rational policy impossible.

The choices are therefore just mixed sex or single sex.

Yet there is a curious lack of interest in engaging with keeptoiletssafe on what this means for toilet design.

So many posts, but still not clear what point is trying to be made.

Really?
There's no evidence that letting the same men who keep threatening to rape and murder us for not believing that they are real women into our toilets and changing rooms puts us at risk of harm?

No risk.

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13178-018-0335-z

Everyone is at greater risk of violence from men.

And there's no evidence women are at risk from trans people.

🙄

So how do you feel about the rape threats, death threats and violence TRAs routinely throw at women. Are you calling them out too or do they get a free pass? I mean, you seem to be saying that all those implied threats of violence are also hate crimes no? So I assume you’re also calling out the TRA issuing these threats? If not, why not? Something to do with “Bros before hos?@

The images I posted prove otherwise. They even have NAMES of the offenders.

"Those links do not show a transwoman assaulted in a male toilet."

They don't have to make the necessary point unless you can't use logic.

More personal abuse
(from a poster thinks women saying no should be classed as a conspiracy theory thats a MRA and TRA take)

The images I posted prove otherwise. They even have NAMES of the offenders.

Isolated instance don't qualify as significant statistical data.

This is from the US (where they don't give a shit about women's rights) and not in any way relevant to what happens in the UK.

In the UK we have had Karen White sexually assaulting female prisoners in a women's prison, Katie Dolatowski sexually assaulting pre-teen girls in women's toilets, and trans activists threatening to rape and murder gender critical feminists thousands of times per day.

So yes, there is a very obvious risk.

I would say that letting men who don't claim to identify as women use women's toilets would actually be less risky than letting trans identifying men use them. Fully mixed sex toilets would probably also be safer because there would be less risk of someone like Katie Dolatowski committing the crimes he committed if other men were present.