Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

JKR Didn’t Have an Opinion. She Poisoned the Well

1000 replies

CSIRCP · 28/08/2025 14:32

This post will likely be a little too long for most, but if you can spare the time and have a cuppa handy let's sit down and have a chat, shall we?

Firstly, let’s stop calling this a debate. It’s not. This isn’t two sets of ideas clashing. This is one woman’s fear and confusion being weaponized against an entire community.

What J.K. Rowling has done is not just share an opinion. She’s poisoned the well. And that poison is spreading through politics, education, the media, and even the courts.

At the beginning, it might have looked like a tweet. Then a blog. But what she wrote in that essay was revealing: “If I’d been born thirty years later, I too might have tried to transition. The allure of escaping womanhood would have been huge.”
That’s not neutral. That’s projection. It was a confession, repackaged as concern. She projected her own dysphoria and personal battles onto the entire trans community and used it as the foundation for a movement built on suspicion and fear.

She said she cared about women’s rights. Then aligned herself with those who believe all trans women are predators.
She liked racist and Islamophobic tweets. She repeated antisemitic tropes. She cast activists as violent men in dresses. She accused anyone who challenged her of misogyny while branding herself the face of feminism.
All the while she built up a devoted audience that now includes some of the most extreme anti-trans voices in Britain and beyond.

This “gender critical” movement is not about safety, and it’s certainly not about truth. It’s about control.
Kellie-Jay Keen-Minshull (Posie Parker), one of Rowling’s ideological allies, has welcomed neo-Nazis to her rallies. Actual Nazis. The kind of people Rowling once wrote villains about.
In one case, people connected to this movement were linked to the satanic terror group 764 — a group that has influenced teen suicides and violent attacks in UK schools. Let that sink in. This is who she’s empowering.

She didn’t just turn away when that started. She doubled down. She gave this movement a gloss of legitimacy. She used her fame to funnel people toward disinformation, fear, and cruelty—and dressed it all up as feminism. But it isn’t feminism when it excludes, vilifies, and harms other women. Especially trans women. Especially intersex people. Especially anyone who doesn’t fit into the narrow fantasy of who is acceptable.

Rowling’s language now echoes in government documents. Her phrases like “gender ideology” have been lifted from far right sources, including the Vatican and authoritarian regimes, and mainstreamed into British law. Her influence helped set the stage for the UK Supreme Court to redefine the word “woman” based on sex assigned at birth, stripping rights from trans and intersex people under the Equality Act. That’s what happens when the well is poisoned. People stop thinking. They start reacting.

Meanwhile, her cult chant her slogans as though they are scientific fact. But science says otherwise. Peer-reviewed studies show that trans people’s brain structures do not align with their sex assigned at birth. They show that gender identity forms in the womb, shaped by hormones and biology not ideology. Large-scale DNA studies have found gene variants linked to gender incongruence. And intersex people exist. That is biological fact. Not one of these truths can be erased by Rowling’s fiction.

What makes this so dangerous is how calm it all sounds. Rowling doesn’t scream. She whispers. She calls it “concern.” She says she’s “just asking questions.”
But it’s never neutral to question someone’s right to exist. It’s not a debate when one side is simply trying to live and the other is trying to strip away their legal recognition and healthcare.

This isn’t just a disagreement. This is a slow campaign of erasure, led by someone with a global platform and millions in the bank.

She’s not some deluded soul from MN; she’s a multi-millionaire author whose words shape global policy. She’s not being silenced. She’s being echoed by judges, by pundits, by politicians trying to climb the ladder by stepping on the backs of trans, non-binary, and intersex people.

And let’s not pretend it stops there. Her influence has allowed people to feel safe expressing open homophobia, biphobia, and hatred toward anyone who challenges gender norms. Some of the same people aligned with her have mocked survivors, denied racism, and claimed slavery was “fine” if it was “kind.”
This is not a group grounded in empathy. It’s a movement that thrives on exclusion and resentment. Some of them now openly identify as neo Nazis. That’s where we are.

So next time someone says “she’s just worried” or “she’s not anti-trans” or “can’t we just disagree,” consider these words. Show them what poison looks like. Not just hateful speech but the deliberate seeding of doubt, division, and cruelty, all wrapped in a soft voice and a smug smile. J.K. Rowling didn’t protect anyone. She infected people. And when she’s gone, her legacy won’t be literature it will be the damage she left behind.

You don’t need to cancel her. You just need to see her clearly.
And if you blindly follow Rowling and her ideas then you need to reflect on what you’re really endorsing.

Because ignorance is not an excuse. Not anymore.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
34
ThatZanyFatball · 28/08/2025 23:27

Your right your word vomit isn't worth finishing.

GargoylesofBeelzebub · 28/08/2025 23:27

TLDR. Just use the men’s room with the other men Dave.

Haulage · 28/08/2025 23:31

SnugPeach · 28/08/2025 21:14

I have my answer before. The only thing I could elaborate on beyond that is nobody chooses to be trans as much as people don’t choose to be gay you either are or aren’t. Surely in the complex scientific understanding we have of our own bodies and that of other animals, so who do in fact change sex. It’s not an alien concept to acknowledge that maybe some people are like this too. Some Brains are different.

When you say Some Brains are different what exactly do you mean? Do we get transgender identifying livers or lungs or eyeballs? If it’s the actual organ that has a transgender identity are there instances where those whose body types are organised around the production of small mobile gametes sometimes in fact produce large immobile ones? Or is it only ever brains that identify as the opposite sex from the body it’s part of? Is it the actual brain itself, or the thoughts within it?

ImGoingUpstairsToTakeOffMyHat · 28/08/2025 23:39

Haulage · 28/08/2025 23:31

When you say Some Brains are different what exactly do you mean? Do we get transgender identifying livers or lungs or eyeballs? If it’s the actual organ that has a transgender identity are there instances where those whose body types are organised around the production of small mobile gametes sometimes in fact produce large immobile ones? Or is it only ever brains that identify as the opposite sex from the body it’s part of? Is it the actual brain itself, or the thoughts within it?

It’s really amazing that archaeologists have never dif up a skeleton and scratched their heads as to what sex it could be. I wonder if they look back and think “Oh that was a trans skeleton!”

SnugPeach · 28/08/2025 23:41

Catiette · 28/08/2025 22:42

@SnugPeach, there was no space to say this on your other thread, so I will here.

I've not read all your posts, but those that I have come across as well-intentioned and thoughtful. This is, frankly, pretty unusual for visitors to this board - hence the sometimes wary, cynical and acerbic responses! But there's also been such empathy in these, too, and I hope you can see this and derive some comfort and reassurance from it.

I thought about writing this on the other thread, but am putting it here now, as it's not unrelated to this one...

I'm sorry you find being called "male" distressing, and sympathise. However, your distress at this is no more essential or valid than our distress at the systematic attempt to remove or muddy sex-based descriptors. Many of us find this deeply - in fact, in all seriousness, "life-changingly" - distressing.

When someone redefines "male" or "female" to lessen their own discomfort, they redefine everyone else by extension. This means leaving others without the words they need - not only words that matter to their mental wellbeing, but also the words they need to advocate for themselves as a political class needing certain legal protections.

This is a huge ask for female people. Just think about it! In the UK, we've had the vote for less than 100 years, the right to get a mortgage for a mere 50, and the right not to be raped by our husbands for just over 30. 30! Did you know that? That females were, in a very real sense, the sexual property of males, more or less within your lifetime? And even now - right now - females have up to 150% less punching power than males, and are about 70% more likely to be injured in car accidents due to designs based on the male body. Can you imagine how vulnerable it can make us feel to navigate the world knowing this?

Please just hold this in your mind as you really think about what you're asking of us in seeking to change the words male, female, woman and man. Think of the generational trauma and fear this knowledge carries. Note, too, that many more blasé women don't even realise how recently won and fragile our rights are, and how much we're still quietly overlooked and dying because of this (the example of cars, above; medical research; an plethora of other horrifying examples not commonly acknowledged). That many women don't realise all this - that it isn't taught in schools in the the way that racism, homophobia and transphobia etc. are - isn't a sign that equality has been achieved, but a sign of ongoing oppression.

And society's systematic removal of the words we need to name and address this oppression is, frankly, bloody terrifying.

To go back to JKR, her fury is because of this. It is the mirror image of the trans activists demanding that they be called "woman" and "female". Both groups want to be able to define themselves. Both groups fear being denied this. That JKR receives such opprobrium for her honesty, wit and (yes, I do think) petty, snidey insults while trans activists holding banners calling for violence against women are lauded by enthusiastic politicians and celebrities honestly only reinforces my impression of which form of oppression - misogyny or transphobia - is more prevalent in an admittedly complex situation (I hate the oppression Olympics, but feel like we've rather been forced by this issue to compete in it...)

And if I have to decide which group is more deserving, then it really does just come down to this for me - Transpeople can distinguish themselves using "trans". Whether or not they wish to do this, they at least have an identity, a political voice, a name - a word. Females/women, on the other hand, will have nothing else left to refer to ourselves and our oppression if these words are taken from us.

Edited

Firstly ok thank you for acknowledging that I do experience distress.

Secondly ya I’m very much aware of the hard won rights women have gotten which has taken many years of fighting against an oppressive system that places men on top. Where women are still treated as lesser than men in all aspects of life. Healthcare, Safety, Law. Men are vastly more protected and the system works in a way to benefit them and protect them and their position. So yes I do understand the many fears many of you here have despite what you may think of me.

All I can say is this. I spent years and years, policing myself and my own feelings out of the fear of being seen as what some of you see me as now, a creepy man who wants to infiltrate some women’s space. I did that because I thought it was right. It bought me nothing but sadness, misery and contempt for my own existence. I don’t want to take or redefine anything away from you. I just want to be seen for who I am and included in that.

ImGoingUpstairsToTakeOffMyHat · 28/08/2025 23:42

SnugPeach · 28/08/2025 23:15

I haven’t had any plastic surgery what!?

How do you have D cup breasts if you haven’t had plastic surgery?

SionnachRuadh · 28/08/2025 23:42

Haulage · 28/08/2025 23:31

When you say Some Brains are different what exactly do you mean? Do we get transgender identifying livers or lungs or eyeballs? If it’s the actual organ that has a transgender identity are there instances where those whose body types are organised around the production of small mobile gametes sometimes in fact produce large immobile ones? Or is it only ever brains that identify as the opposite sex from the body it’s part of? Is it the actual brain itself, or the thoughts within it?

I kind of feel like we've been here before

- YouTube

Enjoy the videos and music that you love, upload original content and share it all with friends, family and the world on YouTube.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5AB7IDw3PNI

SnugPeach · 28/08/2025 23:42

Haulage · 28/08/2025 23:31

When you say Some Brains are different what exactly do you mean? Do we get transgender identifying livers or lungs or eyeballs? If it’s the actual organ that has a transgender identity are there instances where those whose body types are organised around the production of small mobile gametes sometimes in fact produce large immobile ones? Or is it only ever brains that identify as the opposite sex from the body it’s part of? Is it the actual brain itself, or the thoughts within it?

Quite literally some brains are. I’m Autistic and this neurodivergent. My brain works differently to people who are neurotypical.

murasaki · 28/08/2025 23:43

But by being asking to be included , or more in your case telling us that you will invade anyway, you are taking away our agency and redefining words. Do you not see that?

SnugPeach · 28/08/2025 23:43

ImGoingUpstairsToTakeOffMyHat · 28/08/2025 23:42

How do you have D cup breasts if you haven’t had plastic surgery?

Edited

Through Hormone Therapy.

SapphireSeptember · 28/08/2025 23:44

PrawnofthePatriarchy · 28/08/2025 17:32

I was here under the same name when this was all fields. I don't post as often as I used to, because so many brilliant new posters have joined us to carry on the fight but I'm still here.

The OP is a pile of crap and not worth my time.

@Igneococcus and @PrawnofthePatriarchy I was lurking for a while before I started posting on the FWR board. I remember reading stuff about men convicted of rape being put in women's prisons while I was still with my ex-H and I left him in September 2018. Which is why I found my ex-MIL hating on JKR so shocking come 2020 when it really kicked off, because I'd told her about some of the stuff I read on here while I was still with my ex-H and she thought it was awful at the time. So I wonder why she changed her mind?

murasaki · 28/08/2025 23:44

Illegal drugs and over eating.

ImGoingUpstairsToTakeOffMyHat · 28/08/2025 23:45

SnugPeach · 28/08/2025 23:24

I don’t think being a women is a costume god no. I already stated in my prior thread if I could change my dna then I would. But I can’t can I. I also can’t deal with my dysphoria without transitioning so I guess thats all I’ve got.

What is it to be a woman then?

You can’t change your DNA. You’re gonna have to square it with yourself that you’re a man. You can still do feminine stuff and wear clothes usually marketed to women. I think y pull find we are a bunch absolutely in agreement with breaking down gender stereotypes and boundaries (such as clothing). Buying into the trans nonsense reinforces those stereotypes.

SnugPeach · 28/08/2025 23:46

murasaki · 28/08/2025 23:43

But by being asking to be included , or more in your case telling us that you will invade anyway, you are taking away our agency and redefining words. Do you not see that?

Ok serious question what you have me do instead? What does you world with Trans people look like?

ImGoingUpstairsToTakeOffMyHat · 28/08/2025 23:47

SnugPeach · 28/08/2025 23:41

Firstly ok thank you for acknowledging that I do experience distress.

Secondly ya I’m very much aware of the hard won rights women have gotten which has taken many years of fighting against an oppressive system that places men on top. Where women are still treated as lesser than men in all aspects of life. Healthcare, Safety, Law. Men are vastly more protected and the system works in a way to benefit them and protect them and their position. So yes I do understand the many fears many of you here have despite what you may think of me.

All I can say is this. I spent years and years, policing myself and my own feelings out of the fear of being seen as what some of you see me as now, a creepy man who wants to infiltrate some women’s space. I did that because I thought it was right. It bought me nothing but sadness, misery and contempt for my own existence. I don’t want to take or redefine anything away from you. I just want to be seen for who I am and included in that.

I’m afraid who you are is a man.

Women will never see you as a woman, and we don’t have to.

The best way to deal with this is for help with your dysphoria. Not to try and force women to accept you for who you think you are.

You may (wrongly) think you’re a woman, but women don’t have to think that.

ImGoingUpstairsToTakeOffMyHat · 28/08/2025 23:50

SnugPeach · 28/08/2025 23:42

Quite literally some brains are. I’m Autistic and this neurodivergent. My brain works differently to people who are neurotypical.

Edited

Yes, but there is no lady brain or man brain. There is no brain that indicates a “gender”. Largely because gender is a made up concept that reinforces sexist stereotypes, and brains don’t align with made up things

murasaki · 28/08/2025 23:50

SnugPeach · 28/08/2025 23:46

Ok serious question what you have me do instead? What does you world with Trans people look like?

OK, wear what clothes make you happy, grow your hair if you feel like it, use male facilities as you are male, don't pretend to be a woman or that you have any idea what it is to be one (not that you have told us what you think a woman is, or indeed what living is a woman is) and get on with your life without making women uncomfortable.

SnugPeach · 28/08/2025 23:51

ImGoingUpstairsToTakeOffMyHat · 28/08/2025 23:47

I’m afraid who you are is a man.

Women will never see you as a woman, and we don’t have to.

The best way to deal with this is for help with your dysphoria. Not to try and force women to accept you for who you think you are.

You may (wrongly) think you’re a woman, but women don’t have to think that.

Transition is the only thing that’s helped my dysphoria. Not sure what more I can say

ImGoingUpstairsToTakeOffMyHat · 28/08/2025 23:51

SnugPeach · 28/08/2025 23:43

Through Hormone Therapy.

Oh dear Pinocchio.

Telling porkies doesn’t look good for you right now.

Hormones therapy can’t make men grow breasts. You have either had plastic surgery, a stiffed bra or you just have moobs.

Haulage · 28/08/2025 23:52

SnugPeach · 28/08/2025 23:42

Quite literally some brains are. I’m Autistic and this neurodivergent. My brain works differently to people who are neurotypical.

Edited

You said: Surely in the complex scientific understanding we have of our own bodies and that of other animals, so who do in fact change sex. It’s not an alien concept to acknowledge that maybe some people are like this too. Some Brains are different.

So I asked: When you say Some Brains are different what exactly do you mean? Do we get transgender identifying livers or lungs or eyeballs? If it’s the actual organ that has a transgender identity are there instances where those whose body types are organised around the production of small mobile gametes sometimes in fact produce large immobile ones? Or is it only ever brains that identify as the opposite sex from the body it’s part of? Is it the actual brain itself, or the thoughts within it?

Sorry I don’t see how your autism or neurodivergence can help me understand your statement that some animals change sex and maybe some people can too?

edit: unless the ‘brains are different’ line was just a bit of a non sequitur.

Boiledbeetle · 28/08/2025 23:52

SnugPeach · 28/08/2025 23:24

I don’t think being a women is a costume god no. I already stated in my prior thread if I could change my dna then I would. But I can’t can I. I also can’t deal with my dysphoria without transitioning so I guess thats all I’ve got.

But what do you think transitioning will achieve, as by your previous posts it sounds like you'll be starting as a man and ending as a man, just with a larger chest area and no penis. Why do you think this is actually going to make your life better? As you still won't be a woman.

murasaki · 28/08/2025 23:53

SnugPeach · 28/08/2025 23:51

Transition is the only thing that’s helped my dysphoria. Not sure what more I can say

A better therapist who can get to the root of your issues rather than an affirming one would be a good move.

RapidOnsetGenderCritic · 28/08/2025 23:53

CSIRCP · 28/08/2025 14:32

This post will likely be a little too long for most, but if you can spare the time and have a cuppa handy let's sit down and have a chat, shall we?

Firstly, let’s stop calling this a debate. It’s not. This isn’t two sets of ideas clashing. This is one woman’s fear and confusion being weaponized against an entire community.

What J.K. Rowling has done is not just share an opinion. She’s poisoned the well. And that poison is spreading through politics, education, the media, and even the courts.

At the beginning, it might have looked like a tweet. Then a blog. But what she wrote in that essay was revealing: “If I’d been born thirty years later, I too might have tried to transition. The allure of escaping womanhood would have been huge.”
That’s not neutral. That’s projection. It was a confession, repackaged as concern. She projected her own dysphoria and personal battles onto the entire trans community and used it as the foundation for a movement built on suspicion and fear.

She said she cared about women’s rights. Then aligned herself with those who believe all trans women are predators.
She liked racist and Islamophobic tweets. She repeated antisemitic tropes. She cast activists as violent men in dresses. She accused anyone who challenged her of misogyny while branding herself the face of feminism.
All the while she built up a devoted audience that now includes some of the most extreme anti-trans voices in Britain and beyond.

This “gender critical” movement is not about safety, and it’s certainly not about truth. It’s about control.
Kellie-Jay Keen-Minshull (Posie Parker), one of Rowling’s ideological allies, has welcomed neo-Nazis to her rallies. Actual Nazis. The kind of people Rowling once wrote villains about.
In one case, people connected to this movement were linked to the satanic terror group 764 — a group that has influenced teen suicides and violent attacks in UK schools. Let that sink in. This is who she’s empowering.

She didn’t just turn away when that started. She doubled down. She gave this movement a gloss of legitimacy. She used her fame to funnel people toward disinformation, fear, and cruelty—and dressed it all up as feminism. But it isn’t feminism when it excludes, vilifies, and harms other women. Especially trans women. Especially intersex people. Especially anyone who doesn’t fit into the narrow fantasy of who is acceptable.

Rowling’s language now echoes in government documents. Her phrases like “gender ideology” have been lifted from far right sources, including the Vatican and authoritarian regimes, and mainstreamed into British law. Her influence helped set the stage for the UK Supreme Court to redefine the word “woman” based on sex assigned at birth, stripping rights from trans and intersex people under the Equality Act. That’s what happens when the well is poisoned. People stop thinking. They start reacting.

Meanwhile, her cult chant her slogans as though they are scientific fact. But science says otherwise. Peer-reviewed studies show that trans people’s brain structures do not align with their sex assigned at birth. They show that gender identity forms in the womb, shaped by hormones and biology not ideology. Large-scale DNA studies have found gene variants linked to gender incongruence. And intersex people exist. That is biological fact. Not one of these truths can be erased by Rowling’s fiction.

What makes this so dangerous is how calm it all sounds. Rowling doesn’t scream. She whispers. She calls it “concern.” She says she’s “just asking questions.”
But it’s never neutral to question someone’s right to exist. It’s not a debate when one side is simply trying to live and the other is trying to strip away their legal recognition and healthcare.

This isn’t just a disagreement. This is a slow campaign of erasure, led by someone with a global platform and millions in the bank.

She’s not some deluded soul from MN; she’s a multi-millionaire author whose words shape global policy. She’s not being silenced. She’s being echoed by judges, by pundits, by politicians trying to climb the ladder by stepping on the backs of trans, non-binary, and intersex people.

And let’s not pretend it stops there. Her influence has allowed people to feel safe expressing open homophobia, biphobia, and hatred toward anyone who challenges gender norms. Some of the same people aligned with her have mocked survivors, denied racism, and claimed slavery was “fine” if it was “kind.”
This is not a group grounded in empathy. It’s a movement that thrives on exclusion and resentment. Some of them now openly identify as neo Nazis. That’s where we are.

So next time someone says “she’s just worried” or “she’s not anti-trans” or “can’t we just disagree,” consider these words. Show them what poison looks like. Not just hateful speech but the deliberate seeding of doubt, division, and cruelty, all wrapped in a soft voice and a smug smile. J.K. Rowling didn’t protect anyone. She infected people. And when she’s gone, her legacy won’t be literature it will be the damage she left behind.

You don’t need to cancel her. You just need to see her clearly.
And if you blindly follow Rowling and her ideas then you need to reflect on what you’re really endorsing.

Because ignorance is not an excuse. Not anymore.

Bullshit.

ImGoingUpstairsToTakeOffMyHat · 28/08/2025 23:55

SnugPeach · 28/08/2025 23:46

Ok serious question what you have me do instead? What does you world with Trans people look like?

Use facilities that correspond with your sex.

Or use 3rd spaces.

Or here’s an idea - put half the effort into lobbying, fighting for a fundraising for trans spaces that women have figuring for female only soaces. These spaces didn’t fall from the sky, women spent decades fighting for this for other women. Rather than taking what is ours, build your own.

SnugPeach · 28/08/2025 23:55

ImGoingUpstairsToTakeOffMyHat · 28/08/2025 23:51

Oh dear Pinocchio.

Telling porkies doesn’t look good for you right now.

Hormones therapy can’t make men grow breasts. You have either had plastic surgery, a stiffed bra or you just have moobs.

Literally it does. I don’t know what more I can say to you. It’s freely available information. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11235029/#:~:text=In%20transgender%20women%2C%20GAHT%20results%20in%20normal,women%2C%20including%20those%20undergoing%20GAHT%2C%20remains%20unknown.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.