I agree that a sport that involves trying to inflict deliberate damage to your opponent is questionable.
Possibly because my judgment is clouded by having uncles and cousins who took part in amateur boxing when they were young, I make a distinction between pro boxing - 12 or 15 rounds - and amateur/Olympic boxing - 3 x 3 minutes [men] and 4 x 2 minutes [women] rounds.
Maybe my judgment is also clouded by being Irish, and the only Olympic event in which we have a reasonable chance of getting a medal - or 'medalling' as they irritatingly call it - is boxing! C'mon Katie! Hon the parish, Kellie!
Serious injury is unlikely though not impossible, a few amateur boxers have suffered fatal blows, but it is very unusual.
Pro boxing is all about the money, and although there are improved rules about medical examinations, fitness to box, referees stopping the bout to end 'unnecessary punishment', etc., money talks louder than safety -and anyway the whole idea is to try to inflict such a bad injury to your opponent that he is rendered unconscious for a period of at least 10 seconds, and incapable of protecting himself even if he manages to struggle to his feet. So there's nothing safe about pro boxing, whatever 'safety' rules they bring in.
With women's pro boxing on the increase, it's likely that more women will suffer severe or even fatal injuries in the future, because a very fit, strong woman hitting another woman very hard over 10 x 2 minute rounds can inflict serious damage.
Obviously, a very fit, strong man hitting a woman, even over just the 4 x 2 minute rounds of an amateur bout, is frighteningly likely to do serious damage to her.
So I sort of agree with you in the grand scheme of things, PollyNomial, but as long as amateur boxing continues, it needs to keep men out of the women's competitions, so kudos to World Boxing for these clear and comprehensive rules.