Thank you. I will not derail this thread further after this however…
I am aware there will be many different people on this thread with different interests so I want to make the following points.
This toilet consultation a good example of what happens when you gather opinions and how it skews data:
https://www.gov.uk/government/calls-for-evidence/toilet-provision-for-men-and-women-call-for-evidence/outcome/toilet-provision-for-men-and-women-call-for-evidence-analysis-of-responses-received
I really hope the civil servants looking at this critically analysed the Stonewall report that 67% of all respondents referred to, in this ‘calls for evidence’ consultation. This Stonewall report highlighted where two women pushed a person out of toilets and two other people discussing how they were verbally abused for the toilets they were using.
79% of responses in the ‘calls for evidence’ consultation mentioned safety concerns for trans/non-binary people. Obviously safety for everyone is important but complete privacy in an enclosed cubicle is not the safe solution transactivist toilet designers think it is.
In contrast less than 1% of people in the ‘calls for evidence’ consultation, cited safety concerns for boys. From my data, boys have been abused in toilets eg. In big name high street supermarkets when mums have let them go in alone. There are public toilets that have been used as sites for organised sexual abuse of boys. There are girls/young women who have been led into or pushed back into private toilets in very public spaces. Safeguarding and complete privacy are not compatible.
This is why EHRC are right to say there should be exemptions for children going into single sex toilets with their opposite sex carers.
It’s also my worry that the EHRC will not be able to look past all the opinion and analyse the real health and safety reasons toilets were traditionally designed as they were over the years. They need to make sure privacy does not override health and safety. I hope they take guidance from the Health and Safety Executive and the HSE guide them correctly.
I am concerned that toilets need to be looked at much more carefully in terms of criminality, deaths and injury and a quick EHRC decision will cause overall harm if they override HSE and building regs. There’s so much as stake.
‘Anthropologists and sociologists should be infesting public toilets. There’s nothing else in human society quite like them. Not in society, not quite out of it. Needed but rarely demanded. A place where all sorts of human needs and habitats intersect: fear, disgust, conversation, grooming, sex. It’s an ambiguous space that is not quite in the public eye, though the public uses it. A place of refuge and sociability: of necessity and criminality.’
Rose George, ‘The Big Necessity’(2008)