I think we're getting a very useful demonstration in many ways, yes. That women's needs, feelings, existence, everything, is only ever relevant to a man in this ideology when they are doing and performing precisely what he tells them to. Anything other than this pre programmed servicing is a sign of evil, they are broken service humans.
This isn't a healthy or functional or even a rational perspective, and yes, it's proving too that the only information that can be absorbed or considered is the twisted illusions from selected safe sources that go on propping up this personal world. There is no capacity to reason, to understand, to compromise or to even have basic respect for law. Or to see reality as it is. Hence the plopping and running posting.
It is sad, it throws a whole lot of new light on whether it was ever 'kind' to enable, and yes, it absolutely demonstrates to the EHRC exactly what kind of gatekeeping is going to be required to protect women from men who are so very determined to use them.
I imagine that the idea is that '36,000 say yes they're keen to take their clothes off and provide men with the experience of their bodies for those men's purposes' is supposed to mean the same as the line so often trotted about about 'most lesbians really want to sleep with men'. We're talking about half the human population. This is a ridiculously small percentage. And that's before anyone even starts looking at whether this actually was a representative group of women, because it very rarely is - in the same way as if you exclude all the actual homosexual women from a group for being homosexual, and then ask the women left if they're happy for their lesbianism to be bisexuality by another name you'll probably get a nice big statistic proving what you want. It's ridiculously childish.
If 36 women say yes and 1 says no, it does not mean that woman is a mean and nasty person who can now righteously be excluded while the other women revolve around the man and he can do what he wants.
It means that those 36 women and the man can go to the mixed sex space and have a lovely time together while that one woman - whose deeply held innermost feelings, intersectionalities, diversity, lived experience and all the other blethery words go completely ignored because she said no to a man - has a space she can use too .
You cannot exclude and use non consenting women, OP. Sorry. You can't. It is not a right men hold in law, and it is not a right any decent man would wish to hold in law. Women have rights as well as you. Which include being allowed to say no to you. You're going to have to make do with the consenting ones.