Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Flags removed ahead of Pride event = hate crime?

331 replies

Windy23 · 31/05/2025 17:40

Not sure how to feel about this. I don't agree with someone taking the flags down but is it really a hate crime?

BBC News - Hate crime probe after Arran Pride flags removed
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cgq3ekyjeveo

A general view of the Pride march in Brodick with a number of people carrying rainbow flags.

Police probe hate crime over removal of pride flags on Arran

Flags were taken down from Brodick's Main Street overnight ahead of the Arran Pride event.

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cgq3ekyjeveo

OP posts:
Thread gallery
8
BackToLurk · 01/06/2025 10:19

MrsSkylerWhite · 01/06/2025 10:16

This.

It may be a hate crime. You, or anyone else, have no idea until someone is caught, charged and convicted.

CompleteGinasaur · 01/06/2025 10:20

MissScarletInTheBallroom · 01/06/2025 10:01

It's not about being attracted or not being attracted to a certain type.

Lesbians are not attracted to male people. Any male people, even the ones who wear dresses. The definition of a lesbian is someone who is sexually attracted to female people but not male people.

Thanks again, @MissScarletInTheBallroom for elegantly and precisely pointing out what should be blindingly obvious to anyone. Well, anyone who doesn't have an incorrect and homophobic axe to grind. It just occurred to me in passing, however, that there is something a bit sexist about Mumsnet's rather minimal set of "react" emojis. As I read through the thread, and more specifically @suggestionsplease1's asinine contributions to it I found myself constantly wishing for an emoji that signified "this is a load of steaming, duplicitous batshit" rather than just the usual, fairly bland and always positive, four options. There's something very misogynistically reductive about a system which doesn't allow women to express any negativity even when it's manifestly clear that that's the only sane response.

MissScarletInTheBallroom · 01/06/2025 10:24

CompleteGinasaur · 01/06/2025 10:20

Thanks again, @MissScarletInTheBallroom for elegantly and precisely pointing out what should be blindingly obvious to anyone. Well, anyone who doesn't have an incorrect and homophobic axe to grind. It just occurred to me in passing, however, that there is something a bit sexist about Mumsnet's rather minimal set of "react" emojis. As I read through the thread, and more specifically @suggestionsplease1's asinine contributions to it I found myself constantly wishing for an emoji that signified "this is a load of steaming, duplicitous batshit" rather than just the usual, fairly bland and always positive, four options. There's something very misogynistically reductive about a system which doesn't allow women to express any negativity even when it's manifestly clear that that's the only sane response.

I actually got my definition wrong.

The definition of a lesbian is a female person who is sexually attracted to other female people and not male people.

My initial definition would include heterosexual men/TW.

CassOle · 01/06/2025 10:29

Yes, the four 'reactions' don't give much choice, although the laughing one has been put to good use by TRA posters in the past to show that they disagree with a post.

I can't even find a bat emoji in the more extensive emoji choices. 'Bull shit' will have to do.
🐂💩

ETA - in reply to CompleteGinasaur's post about the lack of reaction choices.

NotBadConsidering · 01/06/2025 10:30

suggestionsplease1 · 01/06/2025 09:42

I haven't insisted on men being anything.

i have insisted I am not policing other people's stated identities. If that way forward is good enough for the best countries in the world for women, who have introduced gender self-ID and remain the best countries in the world for women after doing so, it's good enough for me.

You’re accusing people of homophobia while refusing to say what the definitions of lesbian and homophobia are, because you know to do so will either:

a) reveal your own homophobia by using a gender ideology definition or
b) have to admit that men can’t be lesbians and undo your own belief system.

So you say you don’t “insist”. But you insist on making sure the homophobia of your ideology stays hidden.

CompleteGinasaur · 01/06/2025 10:31

Oops, sorry. Too enraged to read properly..

LadyMary50 · 01/06/2025 10:35

suggestionsplease1 · 31/05/2025 18:39

Putin and Orban would be proud of you, you have swallowed the rhetoric nicely 😂

I’ve been called a bigot,a nazis,a terf(quite proud of that one)a few more insults are water off this old terfs back.😂😂

FlakyCritic · 01/06/2025 10:38

Haven't RTFT but it depends on what flag it was. Was it the traditional gay pride flag that 99% of the public would support? Or the so-called 'progressive' (coughcough) flag that includes the 'trans' part that is waved at rallies where male trans activists are openly calling for feminists, women and girls to be "punched in the face"?

The first would be a hate crime, imo, at least. The second would be removing a deeply offensive flag akin the the nazi flag that actively, boldly and proudly promotes physical violence against the vulnerable oppressed sex.

thirdfiddle · 01/06/2025 10:39

"Some lesbians date transwomen"

well yes, when you redefine some straight women as lesbians because their male partners have a trans identity. When you mess with the meaning of words, it does become difficult to convey any information.

FlakyCritic · 01/06/2025 10:44

suggestionsplease1 · 31/05/2025 20:09

You've maybe not been reading FWR enough? It takes every opportunity to progress from transphobia to homophobia.

As opposed to those misogynists with femphobia who by their support of 'transing the gay away' are the very definition of homophobia.

FlakyCritic · 01/06/2025 10:45

suggestionsplease1 · 31/05/2025 20:16

I am am I? I've seen FWR encourage and offer advice on the successful defacement of Pride flags, which is a crime.

And where have you seen that? I presume those people were talking about the misogynistic/homophobic section of the pride flag.

Namechangeforobviousreasons100 · 01/06/2025 10:56

BangersAndGnash · 31/05/2025 18:18

Really obnoxious behaviour.
Including the fly tipping flags on the beach.

Lesbian and Gay people deserve better than to have their march sabotaged.

Suffragette flags, Adult Human Female banners, Palestine Flags, Star of David, and the Tufty Club. No one has the right to ban anyone else’s flag.

Bisexual and trans people, on the other hand….?

LadyMary50 · 01/06/2025 10:58

suggestionsplease1 · 01/06/2025 08:35

Don't be ridiculous.

Are you saying that homophobia never existed before the 'trans cult', as you put it? I can assure you it absolutely did, in much stronger and pervasive forms.

Mainstream awareness and acceptance of trans issues correlates with increasingly positive attitudes to gay people as well.

We know exactly who is fuelling hostility towards us, and it's not trans people.

You are either extremely naive or deliberately combative.The situation today for lesbians is far worse than it ever was in the 7Os when I and many others campaigned for gay rights.The trans activists openly prevent lesbians from pride parades,they have ruined lesbian clubs by insisting men are allowed to join.You have obviously submitted to the trans cult while throwing your sisters under the bus.You and your ilk have done more damage to lesbian rights and put them in more danger than the homophobia of the past.

Namechangeforobviousreasons100 · 01/06/2025 10:59

FlakyCritic · 01/06/2025 10:38

Haven't RTFT but it depends on what flag it was. Was it the traditional gay pride flag that 99% of the public would support? Or the so-called 'progressive' (coughcough) flag that includes the 'trans' part that is waved at rallies where male trans activists are openly calling for feminists, women and girls to be "punched in the face"?

The first would be a hate crime, imo, at least. The second would be removing a deeply offensive flag akin the the nazi flag that actively, boldly and proudly promotes physical violence against the vulnerable oppressed sex.

If you attend pride in London in July I’m sure you’ll see thousands of lesbians, gay men and bisexual people like me proudly waving the Progress Pride flag. Are we all advocating violence by doing that?

FlakyCritic · 01/06/2025 11:01

suggestionsplease1 · 31/05/2025 20:43

The trans people I know are much nicer that the FWR posters spewing hateful rhetoric here; I have no hesitation whatsoever in wanting to support them.

The very same trans people that give rape threats to feminists, that march saying decapitate terfs, that they'll pee where they want, that urinate on feminist statues (even one of Nelson Mandela, like, wtf has Nelson Mandela got to do with feminism?!??), that take pictures of themselves maliciously and vindictively rubbing it in womens faces that they 'marked their territory' in the ladies, and grinning triumphantly, so cause trauma to us?

THOSE trans people? You can keep them. You seem to have the same hate in your heart for the oppressed sex that they do.

Unless of course, those trans people you know are the vanishingly rare few that respect womens sacred safe single sex spaces. However given the level of hatred in your heart for us, somehow I don't think you'd associate with the decent ones.

KnottyAuty · 01/06/2025 11:02

BackToLurk · 01/06/2025 10:13

Maddy must acknowledge that a man of 5 foot who says he’s 6’2” is in fact tall. Or Maddy is a monster.

Short phones are all evil!

MissScarletInTheBallroom · 01/06/2025 11:03

FlakyCritic · 01/06/2025 11:01

The very same trans people that give rape threats to feminists, that march saying decapitate terfs, that they'll pee where they want, that urinate on feminist statues (even one of Nelson Mandela, like, wtf has Nelson Mandela got to do with feminism?!??), that take pictures of themselves maliciously and vindictively rubbing it in womens faces that they 'marked their territory' in the ladies, and grinning triumphantly, so cause trauma to us?

THOSE trans people? You can keep them. You seem to have the same hate in your heart for the oppressed sex that they do.

Unless of course, those trans people you know are the vanishingly rare few that respect womens sacred safe single sex spaces. However given the level of hatred in your heart for us, somehow I don't think you'd associate with the decent ones.

To be honest, I'm not particularly impressed with the trans people who have no comment to make about any of that either.

Namechangeforobviousreasons100 · 01/06/2025 11:03

LadyMary50 · 01/06/2025 10:58

You are either extremely naive or deliberately combative.The situation today for lesbians is far worse than it ever was in the 7Os when I and many others campaigned for gay rights.The trans activists openly prevent lesbians from pride parades,they have ruined lesbian clubs by insisting men are allowed to join.You have obviously submitted to the trans cult while throwing your sisters under the bus.You and your ilk have done more damage to lesbian rights and put them in more danger than the homophobia of the past.

I usually attend Pride with a group of lesbians and bi women and no one has ever tried to exclude them that I’m aware of

FlakyCritic · 01/06/2025 11:03

Namechangeforobviousreasons100 · 01/06/2025 10:59

If you attend pride in London in July I’m sure you’ll see thousands of lesbians, gay men and bisexual people like me proudly waving the Progress Pride flag. Are we all advocating violence by doing that?

Unknowingly then, you are.

But if you know full well that that flag representing trans the gay away and committing physical violence against women - which is exactly what that flag represents, then yes, you are.

It's a Mens Rights movement flag and a homophobic flag. There is no excuse for any decent, warm-blooded, humane human being to wave that hate and violence flag. Ever. Ever.

Namechangeforobviousreasons100 · 01/06/2025 11:06

FlakyCritic · 01/06/2025 11:03

Unknowingly then, you are.

But if you know full well that that flag representing trans the gay away and committing physical violence against women - which is exactly what that flag represents, then yes, you are.

It's a Mens Rights movement flag and a homophobic flag. There is no excuse for any decent, warm-blooded, humane human being to wave that hate and violence flag. Ever. Ever.

Almost all of the L, G and B people I know would disagree with you.

MissScarletInTheBallroom · 01/06/2025 11:07

Namechangeforobviousreasons100 · 01/06/2025 11:06

Almost all of the L, G and B people I know would disagree with you.

Do they condone violence against women and the transing of children then?

FlakyCritic · 01/06/2025 11:07

Namechangeforobviousreasons100 · 01/06/2025 11:03

I usually attend Pride with a group of lesbians and bi women and no one has ever tried to exclude them that I’m aware of

There are hundreds of examples like this. https://x.com/Belstaffie/status/1790130910710333519/photo/1

Only 2 years ago a group of lesbians with a lesbian flag where assaulted and hounded out of a parade. Because? ..... They had the LESBIAN PRIDE flag.

Yep. That is the only reason why.

https://x.com/Belstaffie/status/1790130910710333519/photo/1

BundleBoogie · 01/06/2025 11:07

suggestionsplease1 · 01/06/2025 08:35

Don't be ridiculous.

Are you saying that homophobia never existed before the 'trans cult', as you put it? I can assure you it absolutely did, in much stronger and pervasive forms.

Mainstream awareness and acceptance of trans issues correlates with increasingly positive attitudes to gay people as well.

We know exactly who is fuelling hostility towards us, and it's not trans people.

Funnily enough, LGB acceptance had reached such a level by 2015 that Stonewall worried that they were out of a job. That’s why they decided then to focus on all things trans and totally throw LGB under the bus - campaigning for anti LGB law changes (that placed self declared ‘gender’ over sex in sexual orientation thus destroying all LGB legal protection) and as Nancy Kelley famously compared penis rejecting lesbians to racists.

It occurs to me that Stonewall then attempted to line up more work for themselves in the future by harming the public view of LGB by inextricably linking them with the wholly unreasonable and harmful demands of trans? Or is that giving them too much credit for strategic thinking?

Either way, the trans lobby are turbo charged homophobia.

FlakyCritic · 01/06/2025 11:08

Namechangeforobviousreasons100 · 01/06/2025 11:06

Almost all of the L, G and B people I know would disagree with you.

So you admit they agree with homophobia and physical violence against women, then?