'It's evident to anyone following along at home that you are playing this Mean Girls No True Scotsman Gotcha shit because it is the closest available weapon to hand, and the ability to attack a trans woman is more important to you than any ideological integrity.'
This above, is just more of your hyperbole. No, I am not playing mean girl. No matter how much you want to frame it that way. Telling you that your insistence that you are a woman is flawed because it is only ever based on your male interpretation of how women interact with the world is not me being a mean girl. It is me explaining the very flaws in your repeated and fucking offensive attempts at redefining what the word 'woman' means to suit yourself.
'Everything I say or do will never be enough for you. If I argue back or make my case in a robust fashion, it's male pattern aggression or entitlement. If I don't, and play nice or talk about how hurtful this shit can be, it's manipulative or a hollow performance of stereotypical passivity. You are poised to interrogate and dissect every single aspect of my personhood, searching for the angle that fits your prejudices. You do this over, and over, and over again on thread after thread. You cannot seem to see how this behaviour comes across to anyone who isn't invested in your belief system.'
Nothing you can say or do will ever convince me that you are a woman, or anything but a male person with a particular philosophical belief that doesn't reflect material reality, or that you should have access to any female single sex provision, or that you should be in any 'elder' positions advising any young person, or that you understand the concept of consent.
I point out that you display misogynistic behaviour, because you often do. And you are clearly manipulative as anyone reading your posts can see. The wheedling in this above quoted paragraph is the very definition of manipulative. You want me to agree that you are a woman, no. Nothing you say or do will ever be enough to convince me that you are woman because it is materially impossible.
My belief system is one of established science and it is one that is shared by the vast majority of the world's population. It really seems to bother you that a group of women continue to reject your claims to be a woman simply because it is not possible for you, as a male person, to be a woman.
'What's particularly ironic is that this same overbearing hyper-focused scrutiny is almost identical to the strategic abuse employed by misogynistic men to interrogate and undermine women in technical fields. I deal with this kind of shit constantly elsewhere in very different contexts.'
Are women in technical fields attempting to convince everyone that their philosophical belief is materially real? Is that the comparison that you are now attempting to use? Because it really doesn't work. It is like you needed to present me as being abusive because I don't comply with your demands that I support your philosophical belief and that your philosophical belief is not directly causing harm to female people, so you grasped at this.
It is not controversial in any way to understand that humans come in two sexes which cannot be changed and that female people need to have their sex based rights prioritised over gender when sex matters. Even those female people who have a transgender identity need those sexed based rights to be prioritised when sex matters.