Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Does anyone else feel disheartened?

482 replies

ItsCoolForCats · 01/05/2025 17:32

I was so elated at the ruling and the implications for women's sex-based protections.

And I am happy that certain media outlets have realised (begrudgingly in some cases) that refusing to air the concerns of women over the last decade has lead to a very one-sided debate. It's great to see orgs such as Sex Matters being quoted so extensively now.

However, I'm really disheartened by the sheer scale of the push back and by the fact that so many women don't support the ruling. I mean, why would anyone think that women don't deserve fair and safe sporting opportunities, for example? Why is it always women that are expected to forgo their rights?

The Supreme Court ruling should be definitive, but it doesn't feel like the end. There is the judge bringing the case to the ECHR (I know some legal experts have dismissed any chances of success), but I think activists are going to pile a lot of pressure on the government to make concessions and look at amending the law. The disquiet about the ruling amongst so many Labour MPs about the ruling is concerning me.

Is anyone else feeling a bit dejected?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
24
Circumferences · 03/05/2025 20:01

Some were thrown out of their homes with just the clothes on their backs when they came out to their families.
Oh don't rely on making shit up now, you've done enough of that

FlakyCritic · 03/05/2025 20:02

MadBadDaddy · 03/05/2025 12:34

Abusive men are all on your side of the fence. Russell Brand, Glinner, Matt Walsh, Lawrence Fox, Andrew Tate. Rod Liddle, Tommy Robinson. They all "know what a woman is" though so they get a platform for you to benefit from.

As I said before, you spit on a lot of good women when you spit on my life. And then you wonder why they say no to you.

Russell Brand is a TRA. And pretty standard of one.

FlakyCritic · 03/05/2025 20:07

MadBadDaddy · 03/05/2025 12:51

No-one believes your fairy story that trans people are insane bullies, tantruming, intimidating and sulking their way through life. The more you denigrate, dehumanise and vilify us, the more obvious who is being harmed and who is doing the harming becomes.

The Supreme Court ruling affirmed our status as a minority demographic, and worthy of protection by UK society. You might be less confused by people's reaction to your constant monstering of us if you respected that.

Oh I see, so the scum of your society didn't threaten to burn women alive, to skin us, to rape us with barbed wire baseball bats and DIDN'T URINATE ON A FEMINIST MONUMENT 2 WEEKS AGO, right? Right? The are the vile despicable, disgusting slimy scum that is your section. You're all what you hang with, I hope you're proud! And you fucking wonder WHY you're losing public support!!!:

Does anyone else feel disheartened?
Does anyone else feel disheartened?
Does anyone else feel disheartened?
Does anyone else feel disheartened?
FlakyCritic · 03/05/2025 20:10

MadBadDaddy · 03/05/2025 12:55

Nope. Women's spaces is the vehicle, trans elimination has been the stated goal of Gender Critical / TE rad fem thinking for decades. You only got out the fringes because religious conservatives saw you as useful fodder for their agenda.

No one wants to eliminate 'trans'. It's about eliminating MALES from female spaces. You don't get to relabel or rebadge males a 'trans' and think that makes you a sacred group. As much as you want to eliminate and erase females as a group and as a vulnerable sex class.

MadBadDaddy · 03/05/2025 20:10

FlakyCritic · 03/05/2025 20:02

Russell Brand is a TRA. And pretty standard of one.

Russell Brand is a rapey-wapey creepy-crawly and he supports the SC ruling and the sports bans

Seethlaw · 03/05/2025 20:10

RapidOnsetGenderCritic · 03/05/2025 19:49

I can't agree with that.

Firstly, many adolescents if left untreated with "gender affirming care" grow out of their trans identity.

Secondly, it might relieve the distress of believing that you are Napoleon Bonaparte to be dressed up in 19th century French clothing and exiled to St Helena, but we don't do that. Why not? Surely it would be the kind thing to do?

"Firstly, many adolescents if left untreated with "gender affirming care" grow out of their trans identity."

Very true. Personally, I think hormones and surgeries should only be available for adults, and not even young ones.

"Secondly, it might relieve the distress of believing that you are Napoleon Bonaparte to be dressed up in 19th century French clothing and exiled to St Helena, but we don't do that. Why not? Surely it would be the kind thing to do?"

Well, there's the physical impossibility: it's just not possible to send those people to St Helena and take care of them there.

More seriously: as far as I know, delusions don't generally appear in such an isolated form. They are usually part of a greater disorder, and it's this disorder which needs treating, because of its immense impact on the quality of life of the sufferer. Fighting the delusion then becomes only one arm of the strategy in fighting the illness.

Gender dysphoria, on the contrary, seems to come alone. It's not part of a greater pattern. It's not just one symptom of a more invasive illness. So it's not comparable.

MadBadDaddy · 03/05/2025 20:11

FlakyCritic · 03/05/2025 20:10

No one wants to eliminate 'trans'. It's about eliminating MALES from female spaces. You don't get to relabel or rebadge males a 'trans' and think that makes you a sacred group. As much as you want to eliminate and erase females as a group and as a vulnerable sex class.

Quit your fanciful gaslighting

FlakyCritic · 03/05/2025 20:12

MadBadDaddy · 03/05/2025 13:17

Evangelical christians are well into the UK, several are MPs, and they all support you.

Alasdair Henderson of the EHRC is one. His credits include representing Keira Bell and suing Ealing council to remove the buffer zones around abortion clinics.

Paul Conrathe also represented Keira Bell. He's an evangelical pastor who represented a man who wanted to stop his ex-partner having an abortion.

Justice Hodge of the SC is also an Evangelical. He has stated that gay people need to repent (ie Conversion Therapy) and was responsible for gay marriage not being legalised in Bermuda.

Globally, the religious and/or political groups attacking trans rights are the same groups attacking abortion rights, gay rights and anything that might undermine "traditional gender roles", and they have serious money to spend on their lobbying. Uganda made being gay a capital offence last year thanks to US evangelical lobbying.

If you think this doesn't apply to you or any other leftie atheists, than that just makes you a mug on top of everything else.

Keira Bell? You mean the poor girl that was exploited by the trans cult and amputated her breasts and has damaged her body with dangerous chemicals and has been a flag bearer for how dangerous that vile sick child abusive cult is? Yes, no wonder you don't like her.

ThatCyanCat · 03/05/2025 20:13

MadBadDaddy · 03/05/2025 20:10

Russell Brand is a rapey-wapey creepy-crawly and he supports the SC ruling and the sports bans

And here Dad is trivialising sexual assault.

Operation Let Them Speak has been a resounding success.

FlakyCritic · 03/05/2025 20:13

MadBadDaddy · 03/05/2025 13:24

"The Declaration on Women's Sex-Based Rights" says otherwise. "Elimination" is the word they use.

"The Declaration on Women's Sex-Based Rights" says otherwise. "Elimination" is the word they use.

So you ADMIT this is about hating womens rights.

Ereshkigalangcleg · 03/05/2025 20:14

FlakyCritic · 03/05/2025 20:07

Oh I see, so the scum of your society didn't threaten to burn women alive, to skin us, to rape us with barbed wire baseball bats and DIDN'T URINATE ON A FEMINIST MONUMENT 2 WEEKS AGO, right? Right? The are the vile despicable, disgusting slimy scum that is your section. You're all what you hang with, I hope you're proud! And you fucking wonder WHY you're losing public support!!!:

The attempt by MadBadDaddy to DARVO that abusive men are more likely to support women’s sex based rights than the most misogynistic movement of modern times is really quite something.

Ereshkigalangcleg · 03/05/2025 20:15

ThatCyanCat · 03/05/2025 20:13

And here Dad is trivialising sexual assault.

Operation Let Them Speak has been a resounding success.

Of course.

Flightfromhell · 03/05/2025 20:15

I think the SC ruling has made things worse - before ds was totally on board with us - now he's totally on the other side - there's no law against males entering a woman's toilet, what's changed - it's a minority tiny number of people how do you know who is a man and who is a woman - toilets seem the full focus.

Seethlaw · 03/05/2025 20:15

MadBadDaddy · 03/05/2025 19:56

The NHS won't treat anyone without a diagnosis of GD, so that's horseshit, and not to be smoked.

Are you saying that only people who have obtained a GD diagnostic and gone through the NHS for (I presume) hormones and/or surgery, can be trans?

ArabellaScott · 03/05/2025 20:16

Seethlaw · 03/05/2025 20:10

"Firstly, many adolescents if left untreated with "gender affirming care" grow out of their trans identity."

Very true. Personally, I think hormones and surgeries should only be available for adults, and not even young ones.

"Secondly, it might relieve the distress of believing that you are Napoleon Bonaparte to be dressed up in 19th century French clothing and exiled to St Helena, but we don't do that. Why not? Surely it would be the kind thing to do?"

Well, there's the physical impossibility: it's just not possible to send those people to St Helena and take care of them there.

More seriously: as far as I know, delusions don't generally appear in such an isolated form. They are usually part of a greater disorder, and it's this disorder which needs treating, because of its immense impact on the quality of life of the sufferer. Fighting the delusion then becomes only one arm of the strategy in fighting the illness.

Gender dysphoria, on the contrary, seems to come alone. It's not part of a greater pattern. It's not just one symptom of a more invasive illness. So it's not comparable.

Comorbidities have been routinely dismissed and overlooked. That's a massive part of the problem.

FlakyCritic · 03/05/2025 20:17

MadBadDaddy · 03/05/2025 13:55

Carry on shooting the messenger then, and wondering why seemingly reasonable people keep disagreeing with you, while all the rich egomaniacs love you.

Yet as polls prove, the overwhelming majority agree with us, and you are losing the war. Tribunal by tribunal, sport by sport, law by law. You misogynist femphobic bigots need to go away and cope and seethe. You're losing. The overwhelming majority of society are against you removing womens rights. You're losing. In 20 years time, when this dangerous and sick misogynistic social contagion is over, what are you going to do then.

Ereshkigalangcleg · 03/05/2025 20:18

Flightfromhell · 03/05/2025 20:15

I think the SC ruling has made things worse - before ds was totally on board with us - now he's totally on the other side - there's no law against males entering a woman's toilet, what's changed - it's a minority tiny number of people how do you know who is a man and who is a woman - toilets seem the full focus.

Toilets are not the full focus. The media and TRAs have focussed on toilets.

ThatCyanCat · 03/05/2025 20:18

Ereshkigalangcleg · 03/05/2025 20:14

The attempt by MadBadDaddy to DARVO that abusive men are more likely to support women’s sex based rights than the most misogynistic movement of modern times is really quite something.

What we are seeing here is some real time rage explosion because he can no longer crap all over women and be lauded as a progressive hero for it while women are traduced and silenced.

I don't think he is actually a transwoman, just a dude who got applauded for misogyny for (six) years and is losing his shit because it's all collapsing.

ArabellaScott · 03/05/2025 20:19

MadBadDaddy · 03/05/2025 20:11

Quit your fanciful gaslighting

You are literally arguing that you are a man who is a woman. I don't think I could imagine a more 'gaslighting' position.

Seethlaw · 03/05/2025 20:20

ArabellaScott · 03/05/2025 20:16

Comorbidities have been routinely dismissed and overlooked. That's a massive part of the problem.

Yeah. I've learned about autism here. I wonder what else there might be. Do you know where I could find more information about that?

selffellatingouroborosofhate · 03/05/2025 20:20

MadBadDaddy · 03/05/2025 18:37

The gaslighting and dehumanisation will never stop will it? This place never changes.

Trampling women's boundaries is absolutely what men entering women's loos do. Stating fact isn't dehumanising, nor is it gaslighting.

FlakyCritic · 03/05/2025 20:23

RanchRat · 03/05/2025 15:22

So full of hate, GC 'feminists' will not be satisfied until they have driven the tiny trans community into the ground. Then where will all the hate go? I dread to think who will next be in your sights.

Yeah, because it's so 'hateful' for the "vulnerable 'minority' " of males to be stopped from entering female only sensitive safe single sex spaces and cheating women out of sports. Don't we know MALES in dresses are the most oppressestest group EVAAAAHH!

Does anyone else feel disheartened?
ArabellaScott · 03/05/2025 20:23

Seethlaw · 03/05/2025 20:20

Yeah. I've learned about autism here. I wonder what else there might be. Do you know where I could find more information about that?

Hannah Barnes' 'Time to Think' may be good. I'll see if I can find some refs.

FlakyCritic · 03/05/2025 20:24

MadBadDaddy · 03/05/2025 15:24

Women will continue to be raped, assaulted, harassed and stripsearched by men, no matter how hard you grind trans people into the dirt.

Doing the rounds on Twitter at the moment - "Why would a rapist pretend to be trans in a society that treats rapists better than trans women?"

The SC ruling has enabled even closer scrutiny of women's bodies, as the witch-hunt gets into gear. It's like Section 28 all over again, when The Sun ran "how to spot a poofter" articles.

The SC ruling has not made anyone safer.

Except that, as has been PROVEN, transwomen are treated better than rapists. As has been doing the rounds on twitter.

Annoyedone · 03/05/2025 20:25

MadBadDaddy · 03/05/2025 20:11

Quit your fanciful gaslighting

I think someone is enjoying his scolding a little too much perhaps.