Best Amazon Prime Day deals: Mumsnet favourites

Best Amazon Prime Day deals:
Mumsnet favourites

Shop now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Does anyone else feel disheartened?

482 replies

ItsCoolForCats · 01/05/2025 17:32

I was so elated at the ruling and the implications for women's sex-based protections.

And I am happy that certain media outlets have realised (begrudgingly in some cases) that refusing to air the concerns of women over the last decade has lead to a very one-sided debate. It's great to see orgs such as Sex Matters being quoted so extensively now.

However, I'm really disheartened by the sheer scale of the push back and by the fact that so many women don't support the ruling. I mean, why would anyone think that women don't deserve fair and safe sporting opportunities, for example? Why is it always women that are expected to forgo their rights?

The Supreme Court ruling should be definitive, but it doesn't feel like the end. There is the judge bringing the case to the ECHR (I know some legal experts have dismissed any chances of success), but I think activists are going to pile a lot of pressure on the government to make concessions and look at amending the law. The disquiet about the ruling amongst so many Labour MPs about the ruling is concerning me.

Is anyone else feeling a bit dejected?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
24
TheOtherRaven · 03/05/2025 18:38

Ereshkigalangcleg · 03/05/2025 18:30

These individuals don’t care. It’s not a movement founded on making women feel comfortable, is it?

Less joining than conquering.

Ereshkigalangcleg · 03/05/2025 18:38

But I’m all for the trans rights activists continuing to display their misogyny, narcissistic self regard and complete lack of reason to the world at large. Crack on.

CompleteGinasaur · 03/05/2025 18:39

MadBadDaddy · 03/05/2025 18:31

I'm not interested in changing your minds. You all deserve each other. The point I've been making is that "privacy safety and dignity" is just a mask, and that ordinary people see past it as your dehumanising rhetoric keep spilling out regardless of any effort to keep it behind your back.

I think you're wrong here. I know I don't deserve the erudite and exceptionally patient women on this site at all, the @ArabellaScotts, @MrsOvertonsWindows, @Ereshkigalangclegs and too many others to mention in this tiny sampling who year after year engage with and dismantle malicious bullies like you on the daily. I'm very grateful for them, however. Neither do I know what any of us did in past life to deserve the attention of intellectual titans such as you..

TheOtherRaven · 03/05/2025 18:40

MadBadDaddy · 03/05/2025 18:37

The gaslighting and dehumanisation will never stop will it? This place never changes.

Prove your point.

Demonstrate that there has been no ignoring women's boundaries and lack of consent. You can only call it gaslighting if it hasn't happened.

Ereshkigalangcleg · 03/05/2025 18:41

teawamutu · 03/05/2025 12:06

Our agenda is about enabling women and girls to live their lives, and Jo Public seems not just keen, but increasingly so.

Just bumping this so we can all see what the “Ordinary People” really think.

TheOtherRaven · 03/05/2025 18:42

MadBadDaddy · 03/05/2025 18:31

I'm not interested in changing your minds. You all deserve each other. The point I've been making is that "privacy safety and dignity" is just a mask, and that ordinary people see past it as your dehumanising rhetoric keep spilling out regardless of any effort to keep it behind your back.

But you don't make the point. You have failed entirely to prove that women have NOT experienced issues with privacy , safety or dignity, or to prove why their voices aren't valid when they say so.

You've just ranted a lot about how horrible women are.

MadBadDaddy · 03/05/2025 18:43

soupycustard · 03/05/2025 18:37

This is so depressing. And obviously this is the kind of thing my DD is reading on the Internet and believing: that we're all going around eliminating other human beings.
I wish a TRA would answer my questions about why females should accept males using their spaces and taking their prizes, rather than transwomen (the issue is not at all the same with transmen, who, being female, can use their sex-based rights) using their own rights under the Equality Act and as the dominant sex in society.
Why?

Your DD is astute.

No-one is taking your prizes, and this country has recognised a transgender person's right to exist in society as their "acquired gender", which includes use of single sex spaces, for over 50 years. Does that help?

MadBadDaddy · 03/05/2025 18:44

TheOtherRaven · 03/05/2025 18:42

But you don't make the point. You have failed entirely to prove that women have NOT experienced issues with privacy , safety or dignity, or to prove why their voices aren't valid when they say so.

You've just ranted a lot about how horrible women are.

I'm not making any comment on privacy safety and dignity, other than that was never going to be enough for you.

Ereshkigalangcleg · 03/05/2025 18:44

Now a new YouGov study, the fourth in a series reaching back to 2018, shows an increased scepticism towards transgender rights across the board – and particularly in the two and a half years since our previous wave of this study.
Notable in this most recent study – conducted in mid-December – is the growing resistance on transgender rights among those groups that are typically more permissive on the issue, like women and young people.

Where does the British public stand on transgender rights in 2022? | YouGov

There has been an erosion in support for trans rights since 2018

https://yougov.co.uk/society/articles/43194-where-does-british-public-stand-transgender-rights-1

TheOtherRaven · 03/05/2025 18:46

MadBadDaddy · 03/05/2025 18:44

I'm not making any comment on privacy safety and dignity, other than that was never going to be enough for you.

No, you just said it wasn't a genuine wish or a valid one, and women were 'gaslighting' when they said their privacy, safety and dignity had been affected.

So go on, make your point. If you have one.

Ereshkigalangcleg · 03/05/2025 18:46

The “Ordinary People” speak…

ThatCyanCat · 03/05/2025 18:49

MadBadDaddy · 03/05/2025 18:44

I'm not making any comment on privacy safety and dignity, other than that was never going to be enough for you.

Why don't you let us have those things first and then see?

Try it. Try a little radical self acceptance. Try dressing and presenting as you wish, but not demanding access to women's spaces and using male or unisex ones instead. What do you think we would object to then?

MadBadDaddy · 03/05/2025 18:49

Ereshkigalangcleg · 03/05/2025 18:46

The “Ordinary People” speak…

You're the ones "disheartened" by ordinary people telling you that you are being too horrible and mean to us.

Ereshkigalangcleg · 03/05/2025 18:50

I’m not disheartened. Hope that helps.

ArabellaScott · 03/05/2025 18:50

TheOtherRaven · 03/05/2025 18:46

No, you just said it wasn't a genuine wish or a valid one, and women were 'gaslighting' when they said their privacy, safety and dignity had been affected.

So go on, make your point. If you have one.

It's just DARVO. As you noted upthread. Even our words and arguments get stolen and badly applied to the counter 'argument'. They fit about as well as womens clothes do, too.

TheOtherRaven · 03/05/2025 18:51

Horrible and mean for having rights in law and not handing them over to men and embracing the ongoing abuse.

Try reading the posts love. Actually reading them. Women are disheartened by realising how little they matter, how little anyone cares about what happens to women so long as men get what they want. The utter misogyny. The total lack of perceived value of actual women compared to men identifying as women.

Pretty much as you're demonstrating right here in real time.

WithSilverBells · 03/05/2025 18:57

Ereshkigalangcleg · 03/05/2025 18:46

The “Ordinary People” speak…

They spoke a bit more in 24/25:

PrettyDamnCosmic · 03/05/2025 19:00

Ereshkigalangcleg · 03/05/2025 18:18

None of your juniors, only Actual Senior ones please.

Nah. Senior doesn't cut it. This press release regarding the only bit of research that I have seen from the Tavistock GIDS Clinic contains this weird gem

The paper, by a team of Gender Identity Development Service (GIDS) clinicians and independent researchers, including eminent professors of medical statistics and paediatric endocrinology, reports on the cohort of 44 young people enrolled in the study between 2011 and 2014. The study also evaluated the efficacy of treatment and considered the persistence of gender dysphoria and decisions about future treatment.

https://tavistockandportman.nhs.uk/news/early-intervention-study-shows-puberty-blockers-are-a-well-received-intervention-in-carefully-selected-patients/

Early Intervention Study shows puberty blockers are a well-received intervention in carefully selected patients

Starting in 2011, the Gender Identity Development Service at the Tavistock undertook the Early Intervention Study…

https://tavistockandportman.nhs.uk/news/early-intervention-study-shows-puberty-blockers-are-a-well-received-intervention-in-carefully-selected-patients

RapidOnsetGenderCritic · 03/05/2025 19:02

MadBadDaddy · 03/05/2025 12:51

No-one believes your fairy story that trans people are insane bullies, tantruming, intimidating and sulking their way through life. The more you denigrate, dehumanise and vilify us, the more obvious who is being harmed and who is doing the harming becomes.

The Supreme Court ruling affirmed our status as a minority demographic, and worthy of protection by UK society. You might be less confused by people's reaction to your constant monstering of us if you respected that.

If this is what you stand for, what do think about the common experience of parents whose children "go no contact" if the parents don't do and say exactly what they are told? This is my experience, because I struggled to avoid using the name and pronouns I had used for half a lifetime. I was screamed at, called a bigot, and abandoned to stew in my "transphobic" juice because I didn't instantly match my worldview to my son's new found worldview. I have no doubt that he has been taught that disagreement equals hatred. That is insane bullying, tantrumiing, intimidating and sulking his way through life. And it started only after his declaration of a trans identity.

I still have a hope that he will come back out of this appallingly intolerant worldview and remember what our family once was before it was destroyed by trans identity politics. We used to be able to disagree well. If trans people want to be fully accepted, they will have to drop the self righteousness and coercion, and "live and let live" without trying to control everyone around them.

Shortshriftandlethal · 03/05/2025 19:04

MadBadDaddy · 03/05/2025 18:43

Your DD is astute.

No-one is taking your prizes, and this country has recognised a transgender person's right to exist in society as their "acquired gender", which includes use of single sex spaces, for over 50 years. Does that help?

Not legally or officially it hasn't. The concept of an "acquired gender" has not been around for 50 years. 'Transgender' is a recent construction. 'Gender Re-assignment' only became a protected category in 2004 and it did not give the right to use single sex spaces, as the supreme court has just made clear.

And whatever name you give to your imagined/adopted identity does not turn a man into a woman. 'Transgender' people are either male or female, just like the rest of us.

crochety · 03/05/2025 19:09

MadBadDaddy · 03/05/2025 18:02

I came here to offer an opinion on why the world isn't rushing to agree with your awesome victory, and you have all affirmed my opinion wonderfully - it's not just that you don't see trans people as human, you are incapable of it.

You came here to berate us. But it doesn't matter. Women's rights have been upheld in law by the Supreme Court. And there's nothing that you - or any of the other men that object to this - can say or do to change that.

So keep ranting away, using your tired old arguments and misrepresentations. It's entirely irrelevant. We won - get over it.

EdithStourton · 03/05/2025 19:14

MadBadDaddy · 03/05/2025 18:43

Your DD is astute.

No-one is taking your prizes, and this country has recognised a transgender person's right to exist in society as their "acquired gender", which includes use of single sex spaces, for over 50 years. Does that help?

No, it doesn't help.

And yes, men claiming to be women are quite literally taking our prizes, having won in women's sports and pushed women off the podium.

Women have been assaulted in prison by men claiming to be women. And in hospital. And in toilets.

Just put yourself in our shoes for five minutes, imagine how it feels to know that you're physically weaker than almost every man you encounter, and that men are more likely to use violence than women, and picture going into the ladies ina club to escape some bloke who keeps touching you up even when you've asked him not to, and finding a man in there, too.

And the Supreme Court ruling has confirmed that all those men who have been in women's spaces should not have been.

Does that help?

Edited to correct rage-induced typo.

ThatCyanCat · 03/05/2025 19:17

Just put yourself in our shoes

I don't think that'll be a problem 🤣