Lesbian mistaken for trans woman in woman's bathroom in Arizona

[Christinapple]

https://www.advocate.com/news/lesbian-mistaken-transgender-arizona-walmart

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/masculine-looking-cis-woman-confronted-by-cops-in-walmart-restroom-kalaya-morton-demands-justice-video/ar-AA1AdWpn

But I thought people "can always tell"?

It also led to the irony the only males in the bathroom were two male police officers who were notified by a store employee who mistakenly thought a male had entered the woman's toilets.

"In an alarming incident at a Tucson, Arizona Walmart, 19-year-old Kalaya Morton*, a Black cisgender lesbian, was confronted by two male sheriff’s deputies while using the women’s restroom, sparking outrage and a demand for accountability.
Morton, who identifies as masculine-presenting or a “stud,” recounted the humiliating encounter that occurred when a store employee erroneously assumed she was a transgender woman. The saga began innocuously enough: Morton had entered the restroom with her ex-girlfriend, who was kindly handing her a tampon— an act of friendship that, unfortunately, soon spiraled into something far more troubling. In an exclusive interview with The Advocate, Morton detailed her shock when the two deputies barged in, shining flashlights into the restroom stall.

“You have to get out of here. You have to come out. We need to talk to you.” Imagine trying to pee in peace, only to have the police storm in like it’s an episode of Cops: Restroom Edition.
“I’m still using the restroom. I’m sitting down, I’m peeing. What is the issue?,” Morton incredulously told the deputies as she sat there.
Now, while most people hope for a streamlined bathroom experience, Morton was treated more like a suspect than a bathroom user. The deputies apparently needed to crack the case of “Who Looks Like a Man in the Ladies’ Room,” a particularly absurd mystery, if you ask us."

So, if I don't state which people it was it didn't happen? Does it matter who the high profile people were? If I refuse to say, due to it being very outing, will you not believe me?

Please show me where I said it was about the lack of incidents???

I said they help the information and said how to get the information.

I am berating the women who say it's acceptable for other women to abuse women. I am berating those that think it's acceptable to accuse women of "being men". I am berating those who claim it doesn't happen, or the original post was a one off and doesn't really happen.

That is all.

Transwomen are men.

Babe?

Such an evocative word which prompts such sweet memories.
Is there anything as sweet a slobbering perv who hangs out by the door to the Ladies, and has no idea who you (Babe) is but lives in hope that Babe is too drunk notice the creepy pickup lines?

Babe, its just too too cute for words.

Lets try some affirmations?

• I believe that EM purchased Twitter as it was a solid investment for a great divident yield and a secure capital.
• I believe that Twitter was and is not able to break out its user base and categorise it individual accounts into niche sociopolitical sub-classes.
• I believe that prior to the sale senior Twitter staff were not openly discussing how they were engaged in social engineering by coding in targeted supression of individual users, for ideas or tweets they did not agree with.
• I believe the Staniland question is not required as TRA will accept that human biology has resulted in 2 sex class, one of which should not be in female spaces.
• I believe that TRA on Twitter are not abusively taging women who speak out in support of single sex spaces with images of sex acts.

But sure, I will google how Twitter works and why the woke bros had a meltdown when Twitter was sold at a knockdown price.

I am sharing my opinion. And the reasons behind that.

So, if I don't state which people it was it didn't happen? Does it matter who the high profile people were? If I refuse to say, due to it being very outing, will you not believe me?

I can't say it didn't happen, but unless I know the details I'm not going to know how accurate you're being in your account. Plus, it's not relevant to me in any way.

That's exactly what's not being discussed is it though? We're discussing twitter but it wouldn't be the first time a man thinks he has a clever comment to make that adds nothing to a discussion.

Okay this is undoubtedly a troll. Well done for catching our attention, I guess.

TRAs went through a phase of sending me gifs of shitting dogs. I can assure you I've not encouraged that via any kind of algorithm.

I think you need to re- read over that and correct your typos. Unless you're genuinely saying you don't think the most basic SM algorithm can categorise it's users. If so, where have you been?

I'm a troll because you recognise that all your SM is geared towards this issue? And every account you come across either affirms your view or rage baits you? Sure.

'Babe'. Get a more productive hobby.

This, exactly.

Erm… what a load of bollocks. You cannot see on any SM site what people have saved in their bookmarks. When you resort to making stuff up it undermines your position.

I have, like many here, had a lot of porn - and ‘watch my sex cam’ DMs - sent to my inbox in X/twitter over the years on a ‘professional’ and non political account. Not made a single mention of genitalia, just books. On that account I don’t follow politics or ‘this’ issue, but so follow professionals of all political persuasions and expressly ignore anything unrelated to publishing/writing/academia. Oh, and I may have liked a launch tweet about JKRs latest book launch. That’s all it takes to get obscene material sent to you.

https://x.com/speakoutsister/status/1897265583433142668

Turns out this thread was linked to yesterday by a transactivist account. Makes sense now why we're getting their low quality arguments littering up the thread.

Babe?

🤮

(Autocarrot tried to turn it into 'babel'. Which would have also made sense.)

Aha.

Truth hurts? 😂
Why don't you open a new SM account and see how much your feeds are swamped by this issue as a base level. If I'm wrong you'll still see it everywhere and come across all this porn still won't you?
I think given how PP have shown how uninformed and naive they are about the internet, I think my hobby of informing you how it works is a pretty good one. Especially seen as your internet culture war is resulting in GNC women being harassed in the real world. But somehow that's their own fault for how they dress or it's TRAs faults that's been the line of this thread so far, couldn't possible be the fault of someone radicalised to hypervigilance online like PP who agreed with the police coming and would call them themslves. Bit hypocritical to be quoting DARVO when this thread has been a example of it.

Its the same crap that is rolled out against the Staniland question.

When asked the individual could not answer so they opt to try demean the person who asks the question.

Babe 😂😂😂

Erm no it's not a load of bollocks 😂 I'm talking about when people share a screenshot of their screen and you see their bookmarked websites.

I'm not doubting anyone can see porn on twitter as I said twitter is full of porn. But if you are regularly seeing porn of trans individuals especially and especially in toilets on threads or your FYP it's because you are engaging in that algorithm, that's literally how it works. You can argue it all you want but you can't change the facts. You can literally test it and see - start a blank account and see how long it takes for you to randomly unprovoked get trans porn on your feed. You won't.

By specifiying a category of men as "non transwoman men", it is an inadvertent admission on the part of that poster that they recognise that TW are a category of men, the "transwoman men".