I think the spell is finally broken...

[Daysnconfuddled]

https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/01/defending-women-from-gender-ideology-extremism-and-restoring-biological-truth-to-the-federal-government/

We do the same here. Northern Irish law is not the same as Scots law, which is not the same as English law, which isn't always the same as Welsh law.

The men would still know who the women were to rape us.

Which part of this is "not feminist"?

Sec. 4. Privacy in Intimate Spaces. (a) The Attorney General and Secretary of Homeland Security shall ensure that males are not detained in women’s prisons or housed in women’s detention centers, including through amendment, as necessary, of Part 115.41 of title 28, Code of Federal Regulations and interpretation guidance regarding the Americans with Disabilities Act.
(b) The Secretary of Housing and Urban Development shall prepare and submit for notice and comment rulemaking a policy to rescind the final rule entitled “Equal Access in Accordance with an Individual’s Gender Identity in Community Planning and Development Programs” of September 21, 2016, 81 FR 64763, and shall submit for public comment a policy protecting women seeking single-sex rape shelters.

Cleaners put signs up so you know they are there, so at least you make an informed choice to go in.

Fetishistic men don't.

If the wokescolds were truly leftist, they'd recognise "I can be open minded to things changing in the future without compromising the case for single sex provisions today. On the contrary, laying out what would have to have changed to make single sex provisions no longer necessary really highlights that we are no where near a world where that is the case." as an example of a Marxist "transitional demand", in which we demand single sex provisions as an interim measure until men stop raping us.

(c) Each agency head shall promptly rescind all guidance documents inconsistent with the requirements of this order or the Attorney General’s guidance issued pursuant to this order, or rescind such parts of such documents that are inconsistent in such manner. Such documents include, but are not limited to:

Do you see that bit in bold? That's the bit that allows agency heads to redact the gender ideology parts of a document and leave the rest of the document intact.

These resources aren't necessarily being banned. They might be edited, but they don't have to be banned.

This is the third time you've said something like "enjoy your little echo chamber". It comes across like someone performatively gathering their things and storming out and getting upset that everyone else is just ignoring them or saying "OK, whatever" and keeps pointing out that they are leaving in the hope of getting the reaction they want.

Multiple US states have abortion later than six weeks. Stop exaggerating. The US doesn't only contain Texas.

That executive order doesn't mention gay people, other than in a list of titles of documents to be amended, it doesn't mention race, and it mentions women only to uphold our rights.

President Pussygrabber's election is a natural consequence of Dems screaming "TERF! Bigot!" at every sex realist and alienating sex realist Dems. You reap what you sow here.

I think you are projecting your own upset and childishness, considering you seem obsessed with these threads and posting inane nonsense that contributes absolutely nothing. Calm down dear and have some discussions in the real world which actually matter.

The mere existence of trans people doesn't threaten women's rights but the demands made by transactivists in the name of their identity have repeatedly done so. The worst effects are seen where gender identity has been most indulged at the expense of sex. For instance: in Australia, lesbians cannot now gather or date in women-only groups; any male who says he is a lesbian must be included. In Germany, a far right criminal is currently trying to identify himself into a women's prison. He may well succeed.

It's not only women's rights. In the UK alone, damage has been done to academic freedom, the principle of civil service impartiality and the coherence and integrity of public data. That's before we begin on the risks of a fashionable "solution" pushed at children and young people who are uncomfortable - for any reason - with who they are.

The concerns expressed on this board about women's rights and the threats posed by privileging gender ideology above reason are not a "guise". They are real and justified.

Calm down dear

You are Boris Johnson and I claim my five pounds.

@Heggettypeg You are preaching to the converted.

Well that's a relief!

Insulting people doesn't win them over. I've supported my arguments with facts. Where are your facts?

Another use of 'dear'. Even when you point out the tells they still keep doing it 😂

Oh dear lord!

🤣🤣🤣

It's the modern day Violet Elizabeth Bott

'calm down dear' 'childishness' and 'the real world' ALL IN THE SAME POST.

Let them speak writ large. Women are not real human beings for you, are we?

considering you seem obsessed with these threads

Says the poster who has posted 22 times on this thread to my 20. This will be my 21st post.

As I said, facts.

Only in today's world could the election of a black woman to the leadership of the Conservative party be considered evidence of white supremacy and the protection of woman from male rapists in prison deemed to be damaging to women.

This is what you get when you compel people to called bearded Brian in men's clothes a woman, or a double rapist vulnerable because he wants to move to a women's prison.

Who claims to be part of the "psychology community" yet displays a startling lack of insight while posting numerous intemperate insults on this thread.
All aimed at women - funny that.

Yes, psychology 'community' sounds almost comedically euphemistic.

Did I say you?
No, I didn't.
I said this board in general.
Unless you are actually saying you are all a hive mind now.

If the original meanings of Left and Right still mean anything, I'd say that the centre of gravity of MN is certainly left of centre, and the FWR folder, probably even more so. Of course, I'm taking no account of the fact that many left-leaning political parties, unions, and so on, seem to have lost their collective minds.

That was rather my impression at the time of the last UK election.

There were some posters who were clearly Conservative or even considering Reform, but a very characteristic type of post was on the lines of being a lifelong Labour/left of centre voter and being pretty sick at having to choose between giving up on that or supporting a party that were supporting gender ideology (Labour, Liberal, Green, Plaid and SNP all being a washout in this respect).

There were prolonged discussions about spoiling one's vote and whether it did any good in terms of making one's opinion visible. A lot of people said they felt politically homeless. I felt much the same - ended up casting my vote (Leftwards) on another issue dear to my heart, but feeling torn.
.