Three-day ban on Reddit for “hate”

[ConversingWithStrangers]

The only thing I can think of is posting on a UK sub about male violence. A man said that it’s not just men who have a problem with being violent because he’d been assaulted by a trans woman. I replied, “how did you know your assailant was trans?”.

They literally have subs for men to masturbate to videos of women who have a look of being “dead behind the eyes” they’ve been abused so much.

(It’s either that or somebody doesn’t like my crochet advice).

Lucky? this has to take the prize for the most ridiculous claim on the thread. And there’s some stiff competition.

I for one am devastated that my posts aren't to your taste

But trans people can expect the rest of society to organise themselves around trans people's personal, private gender identities?

Make it make sense.

The third space is for those that don't want to use the facilities priovided for their sex.

I am bookmarking this to show everyone I meet who has no inkling of how deranged the ideology is.

Exactly. This is just the response I always get.
This is proof that the desired solution is not about “personal boundaries” it’s about insisting everyone else - all society - conforms to their ideologies about sex and gender, and desire to segregate/ exclude those whose bodies and identities do not conform to their beliefs about how people ought to be .

But trans people can expect the rest of society to organise themselves around trans people's personal, private gender identities?

I think that's the point. It's a DARVO.

As long as that third space is big enough for roughly half the population to use, and it is made a criminal offence for any male person to enter it, then that's absolutely fine by me, pal.

The other reason the leveraging of the Taliban is so disturbing is because women in Afghanistan can't identify out of their oppression by becoming trans men or non binary, whereas trans women can escape their oppression by...wearing trousers and growing a beard.

A question for Lostcat.

A young woman has been in a bad accident and is in hospital unable to move from her bed due to her injuries. She needs intimate care during her recovery including bathing, wiping her bum after using the bed pan and changing of sanitary products while she menstruates. She requests a female nurse (and specifically means a biological female nurse, not a transwoman nurse) to do this due to her privacy and dignity during this time when she is extremely vulnerable (cannot even get up from the bed).

Do you think that it is reasonable of her to make this request? Should the hospital fulfill it and ensure that only a female nurse helps her with her intimate care needs? If not, why not?

and it is made a criminal offence for any male person to enter it

wow .

you want to criminalise being trans.

if ever anyone was in doubt about the violence behind GC ideologies this is it.

Also marking this for the complete disregard for child safeguarding that always seems to accompany these sort of posts. Can't imagine why

Spoiler: they won't. Because being in the company of unconsenting women is the point.

the point of being trans is to be in the company of “unconsenting” women?
So in your mind being trans = being a sexual predator?

you want to criminalise being trans.

Why would a man enter a space specifically for women whose boundaries are such that they can't share spaces with men? And why have you assumed these boundary violating men are "trans"? Very revealing.

The true attitudes that are behind all of this are all coming out again.
Off you all go.

A poster using the name PiggleToes advocated for "third spaces for gender critical women" on the threads entitled "To think that releasing crickets at a gay rights conference, specifically to shut them down, should be considered a homophobic hate crime? Somehow these people are crowdfunding to do it AGAIN" and "Female nurses have to get changed with a male. They are told to go to another room. The man keeps the female changing room to himself. Wtaf is going on?" on the AIBU board.

Touch of desperation now

What? No.

This is the third space for women who need single sex spaces we are talking about. I'm talking about creating single sex spaces, which you claim have never existed, as opposed to the single gender spaces you claim are the norm. If we are creating a single sex space we need to ensure that the single sex nature of that space is protected.

It has nothing to do with "criminalising being trans" but criminalising male people using an explicitly female only space when not just one but two alternatives, one of which says "women" on the door, are available.

Are you suggesting that we have a third space for women who can't share these spaces with trans women, but no consequences if trans women decide to disregard that boundary and use it anyway? What is the point of that?

"and a third space for those whose boundaries mean they do not want to interact with anyone registered male at birth/ or with XY chromosomes/ or who is capable of impregnating someone/ or however it is you want to draw the line (as I’m not clear really)."

Your post @Lostcat - seeing as you are lamely attempting to pivot. Why is a man violating this space necessarily going to be "trans" ? As I say, very revealing of your mindset.

Now? I’m pretty sure you called me this yesterday.

They aren’t necessarily trans, but a trans person simply trying to “pass” would still be criminalised by this policy.

but if the shoe fits

keep going.

And WOW, you reported that post? Seriously?

Well it's happened more than once