Trump's plans for day one: ending child sexual mutilation and having just male and female genders

[ResisterOfTwaddleRex]

He says "genders" but that has to mean "sex". Day one executive orders, apparently:

x.com/chooocole/status/1870920265330528324?s=46&t=WHoOZ_3Kv5G6-FyQuvE0LQ

you are speaking from an ultra feminine looking woman's privilege.

Careful, apparently it makes you hard of thinking to have no interest in reading endless paragraphs of self serving waffle in FWR!

I had enough interest to read yours.

Once again we see the inability of tras to take responsibility for the inevitable fall out from their behaviour. They/them did this, not posters on MN.

There's a discussion about this on Threads and it's biologically clueless. They're all at the "what about intersex" and "all embryos start off as female" stage.

I can believe it.

Because it's my choice not to respond to every spurious "point" you imagine you are making. It's just a predictable list of TRA talking points. Hope that helps.

I suppose if you're stupid enough to think that humans can change sex, then thinking that all embryos start off as female isn't such a stretch.

Well, quite @RoyalCorgi

LadyGreyson

I suspect you still haven't read the Executive Order.

Perhaps that is why you are still framing it as anti-trans. It's pro-women. Nothing in it stops anyone from wearing what they want, or claiming a transgender identity. It just means that society, women in particular, are not forced to believe, or act as if they believe that anyone has changed sex.
That's just asserting normal reality. Why would you oppose that? Why would that make you so angry?

Do stop calling women you disagree with a mob, @LadyGreyson, while hypocritically preaching about tone. Not your first rodeo here, I think.

Well, why not answer?
For example, what do you understand "gender critical" to mean? Or "sex realist"?

When someone who isn't self declared GC

I said this earlier; you are confusing 'gc' as an identity, rather than a specific and pretty unexceptional collection of beliefs. Some of which you say you hold.

This article is an interesting insight into the possible mindset of the tra doommongers

https://thecritic.co.uk/the-genital-inspection-unit/

Right. You're not interested in actually making any progress, here, are you?

"Set about writing pages of self indulgent bullshit"

much polite, very civility

That's a great article, Victoria Smith is always right on the money.

"In the case of “genital inspections”, women and girls are told if they want any room of their own, someone would have to stand outside it, looking into their pants to make sure there was no penis present.

Apparently one couldn’t just expect penis-owners to follow rules on the basis that they’d face disapproval were^ they found to be breakingthem. Those who claim to be no threat to women can’t be trusted to demonstrate it, therefore the only thing for it is to have no boundaries for them to overstep^."

TRAs do enjoy a good old froth about the imaginary "genital inspectors".

Yawn.

Next.

Okay, thanks for being honest about your intent. I'll disengage going forward and just report any insults.