Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Could we ban "transvestigating" threads on here?

1000 replies

Christinapple · 09/12/2024 01:00

https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5225715-ilona-maher

This one for example. Transvestigating is an informal term given to when people play detective and try to determine if a given person (usually a woman) is transgender or not from how they look e.g. photos.

I've seen it more than a few times on Twitter anytime a woman who is tall or muscular or "masculine looking" appears. Quite often, women are wrongly mistaken for being trans.

As well as being transphobic, IMO this harms all women and reinforces stereotypes of what men/women should look like. And the idea of obsessing over people's appearances like this just doesn't sit well with me.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
27
ButterflyHatched · 10/12/2024 14:22

Skyrainlight · 10/12/2024 13:49

I find the term Cis offensive.

I'm not a fan of it either but it sure is a handy scientific prefix sometimes. I'll stop if you'd prefer.

I find the term transwoman without the space offensive, alongside the term TRA (when used to denigrate through comparison with the perjorative MRA), and male (when used in a context that clearly demonstrates intent to misgender).

I also find the term 'transperbole' offensive as well as it demonstrates an offhand dismissal of the lived reality of a marginalised minority.

ButterflyHatched · 10/12/2024 14:24

Helleofabore · 10/12/2024 14:07

stochastic terrorism = female people declaring their valid and legitimate needs.

Just two of these are female single sex spaces to exclude all male people above age needing care and the female sports category to be protected.

But stochastic terrorism, innit?

On average, how much did the rate of hate crimes against trans people increase since 2017?

SinnerBoy · 10/12/2024 14:24

InvisibleBuffy · Today 13:23

I'm also very, ahem! sceptical of that post.

FlirtsWithRhinos · 10/12/2024 14:24

Helleofabore · 10/12/2024 14:07

stochastic terrorism = female people declaring their valid and legitimate needs.

Just two of these are female single sex spaces to exclude all male people above age needing care and the female sports category to be protected.

But stochastic terrorism, innit?

I assume given the thread topic, what Butters means by "stochastic terrorism" is along the lines of "women are increasingly aware that a woman in a woman-only space who seems somewhat masculine may actually be male and are therefore starting to be more questioning of such people, which makes them feel unsafe."

Yes, Butters experiences women having boundaries and insisting on their right to enforce them as "Terrorism".

Although let us have no doubt, Butters sympathy is not for women who may be mistakenly challenged, but that men are now getting found out. (Original sex-based meaning in both cases)

Greyskybluesky · 10/12/2024 14:25

I'm not a fan of it either but it sure is a handy scientific prefix sometimes. I'll stop if you'd prefer.

Lots of prefixes are "handy" but are offensive and so we do not use them.
It has been pointed out to you several times that people do not want you to use this term but you continue to do so.
It is not "scientific".

Chersfrozenface · 10/12/2024 14:26

ButterflyHatched · 10/12/2024 14:24

On average, how much did the rate of hate crimes against trans people increase since 2017?

Define 'hate crimes'.

TWETMIRF · 10/12/2024 14:26

When we call people male we are referring to their sex and therefore aren't misgendering. You can't decide to use a pre existing term to mean something different and then complain that people carry on using it the way we always have done.

If you decided to call apple juice coffee, don't complain in a café when you order coffee and don't get apple juice

SinnerBoy · 10/12/2024 14:27

Weirdly, though, they never once targeted me. I've walked right through groups of anti-trans activists hurling abuse at any visible trans people they see over the last few years; I even had to stop and ask them to please get out of the way so I could get to my train once.

That's very interesting indeed, all the footage I've seen on news reports and online have shown the exact opposite, screaming, baying mobs of TRAs hurling threats and abuse at women, as well as assaulting them. I've never seen the opposite, with women screaming at TRAs.

Is there some sort of parallel internet, where the videos have been posted?

showersandflowers · 10/12/2024 14:27

I am a biological woman - always have been and always will be. I have size 10 feet, I'm 6 foot tall and I have a scar on my neck which makes it look like I have an Adam's apple (from some angles).

I lose count of how many people in my life have speculated on my gender (particularly at school and college) and called me a man and it's completely humiliating. Some women just look like this.

So I'm in support of this.

ButterflyHatched · 10/12/2024 14:27

Chersfrozenface · 10/12/2024 14:26

Define 'hate crimes'.

Why not ask the body recording them?

sillything · 10/12/2024 14:27

ButterflyHatched · 10/12/2024 14:22

I'm not a fan of it either but it sure is a handy scientific prefix sometimes. I'll stop if you'd prefer.

I find the term transwoman without the space offensive, alongside the term TRA (when used to denigrate through comparison with the perjorative MRA), and male (when used in a context that clearly demonstrates intent to misgender).

I also find the term 'transperbole' offensive as well as it demonstrates an offhand dismissal of the lived reality of a marginalised minority.

Are the "cis women" friends of yours who were misgendered as men in your presence also part of an oppressed minority?

Also, how does that happen? I'm taller and blockier than average, tobacco has impacted my pitch, very much a dikey dyke, and it still doesn't seem to happen to me.

Chersfrozenface · 10/12/2024 14:28

ButterflyHatched · 10/12/2024 14:27

Why not ask the body recording them?

Which body is that?

SinnerBoy · 10/12/2024 14:29

Chersfrozenface · Today 14:26

Define 'hate crimes'.

Looking a bit perturbed, when a transw gets on the bus.
Not agreeing that they are 100% real genuine women.
Objecting to naked men transw flashing their bits in changing rooms.

There are probably a few more.

Helleofabore · 10/12/2024 14:30

ButterflyHatched · 10/12/2024 14:24

On average, how much did the rate of hate crimes against trans people increase since 2017?

Would you like to find a very clear definition of what constitutes a hate crimes against someone with a transgender identity? Because a far as I could work out it includes misgendering and stickers.

And what is the relevance of the hate crime statistics to my post exactly ? Please state it clearly without any of the obfuscating accusations or catastrophising statements that have become standard now.

SinnerBoy · 10/12/2024 14:31

Chersfrozenface · Today 14:28

Which body is that?

The Ministry of Most Oppressed and Most Marginalised and Most Vulnerable People in the History of the Universe, I think.

WarmingClothesontheRadiator · 10/12/2024 14:32

Good news on the trans hate crime front - they dropped last year.

FlirtsWithRhinos · 10/12/2024 14:35

Despite what men think, women saying no to men is not an act of hate.

Shortshriftandlethal · 10/12/2024 14:38

ButterflyHatched · 10/12/2024 11:46

I'm sorry, I don't believe that bodies are spiritually sacred things that are desecrated through modification.

Your body, your choice. If you don't like something you're allowed to change it. Only you get to decide that.

You also pay for it yourself......and don't seek remedy from the NHS when it goes wrong or leads to dysfunction.

I think you'll find that most people are upset when their own body, or the body of a loved one, especially the body of a child, is disfigured, maimed or badly damaged in some way. A whole, healthy and functional body is a beautiful thing. Have you never taken delight in the fingers and toes of a newborn, or marvelled at the miracle that is their body?

Shortshriftandlethal · 10/12/2024 14:44

ButterflyHatched · 10/12/2024 13:12

It took me several years to realise nobody could tell. I was always waiting for it; fearing the moment when it would turn out I'd just been being humoured; that secretly people were just being polite.

Once you realise clinicians are assuming you are here to attend maternity departments and people are behaving in ways that demonstrate they have psychologically categorised you as 'cis female' even in the presence of trans women they are subconsciously behaving differently around, you realise that it's actually kind of ridiculous to keep your walls up.

When I saw that one of my older cis female friends was occasionally getting accidentally misgendered even when I was literally stood there right next to her, and saw other trans women being regularly misgendered even while once again standing right next to me, I realised that people really can't always tell and as long as I was careful about what I said, I'd be safe.

The first time I disclosed after nearly a decade of complete and repeatedly demonstrable invisibility, I did so exclusively to a group of other (misogyny-subject) feminists I had spent years carefully scrutinising and slowly learning to trust. They had no idea and some initially thought I was joking because it was so out of nowhere. There was a lot of 'You didn't need to tell me and I'm kind of sad that you were scared, but thankyou for sharing. Also...I know trans people and had absolutely no idea that was even possible, what the hell?'. I did ask if there was any advice and offered to remove myself if it was a problem for anyone and got a unanimous 'don't you fucking dare imply you have any less right to be here than any of us' scolding which rather set the tone for the future.

It could have just been a fluke that time, but the same has happened again and again for years and years and the general baseline of society has moved in a positive direction.

Around 2017 the evangelical right's pivot toward using trans people as a wedge issue caused it to start becoming more dangerous to be visibly trans again. Trumpism manifested as a neoreactionary extinction burst, the papers went full mask-off over here and it wasn't long before suddenly the transphobic FPFW flyers started mysteriously appearing all over publicly accessible safe spaces, even in academic institutions with positive cultures of tolerance.

Trans people were being more generally accepted as a baseline, but were also seeing more active abuse from highly radicalised anti-trans activists. Some of my friends - sometimes even cis women - would get challenged. It was terrifying.

Weirdly, though, they never once targeted me. I've walked right through groups of anti-trans activists hurling abuse at any visible trans people they see over the last few years; I even had to stop and ask them to please get out of the way so I could get to my train once. Nothing.

When I heard a cis woman being hasseled by the same group later in the day for being tall and having short hair I began to realise what was actually going on and where things were going - the pretence is slowly falling away as the overton window shifts and the quiet part starts becoming audible.

The phenomenon of Transvestigation and the bizarre conspiracy lore it has become embedded in is one of the many outcomes of a decade of stochastic terrorism.

I'm not sure I believe the bit where you say that "anti trans activists were hurling abuse"?

My experience of women's rallies, meetings and so on is that the abuse is all the other way. Women may chant, at very worst, " Trans women are Men"...and that is simply true. women are generally meeting up to discuss issues, not wave banners and scream at trans activists. It is they that turn up to disrupt and shout.

FlirtsWithRhinos · 10/12/2024 14:50

At the end of the day, if women knew we could 100% trust that anyone described as a woman or entering a woman only space or event was a woman under the original sex based meaning, not the holds-a-special-paper meaning or the I-had-surgery meaning or the I-am-if-i-say-i-am meaning, women looking suspiciously at other women would not be a thing.

it's not happening because women suddenly decided to start "policing femininity". It's not happening because women suddenly forgot women can look masculine. It's happening for one reason and one reason only : because men started turning up where they should not be.

Greyskybluesky · 10/12/2024 14:51

Greyskybluesky · 10/12/2024 14:25

I'm not a fan of it either but it sure is a handy scientific prefix sometimes. I'll stop if you'd prefer.

Lots of prefixes are "handy" but are offensive and so we do not use them.
It has been pointed out to you several times that people do not want you to use this term but you continue to do so.
It is not "scientific".

Just to clarify because I couldn't edit my comment and it's bugging me: I meant it is not scientific in this context. In chemistry, yes.

FlirtsWithRhinos · 10/12/2024 14:56

Shortshriftandlethal · 10/12/2024 14:44

I'm not sure I believe the bit where you say that "anti trans activists were hurling abuse"?

My experience of women's rallies, meetings and so on is that the abuse is all the other way. Women may chant, at very worst, " Trans women are Men"...and that is simply true. women are generally meeting up to discuss issues, not wave banners and scream at trans activists. It is they that turn up to disrupt and shout.

Edited

To be fair to Butters, there are anti trans groups and trans people do face genuine abuse.

I assume Butters is speaking of these groups and not of women who say no to male colonisation of woman's language and women's rights.

These groups do not support Feminism or women's rights even if they sometimes try to force team with us.

I'm sure Butters would not attempt to leverage the hate trans people get from reactionary groups to attempt to discredit Feminists who simply say that sex matters more than gender when it comes to women's needs and rights.

PriOn1 · 10/12/2024 14:58

“clinicians are assuming you are here to attend maternity departments”

I can’t really remember this ever happening to me. Trying to imagine how this looks. Even if presenting one’s self at the desk in a maternity unit, I’m not sure any assumption would be made that one was a patient, unless there was noticeable evidence of likely pregnancy. Why would anyone who knows they aren’t pregnant present themselves for an appointment (the main reason someone would assume the person is a patient)?

Gynecology would have been more believable, though it has made me contemplate the possible presence of a significant beer gut. 😂

sillything · 10/12/2024 14:58

FlirtsWithRhinos · 10/12/2024 14:50

At the end of the day, if women knew we could 100% trust that anyone described as a woman or entering a woman only space or event was a woman under the original sex based meaning, not the holds-a-special-paper meaning or the I-had-surgery meaning or the I-am-if-i-say-i-am meaning, women looking suspiciously at other women would not be a thing.

it's not happening because women suddenly decided to start "policing femininity". It's not happening because women suddenly forgot women can look masculine. It's happening for one reason and one reason only : because men started turning up where they should not be.

But is it really happening in real, day to day life?

I'm broad-shouldered, muscular, taller than average, have a deep voice. I have friends who are taller by 4 inches and obviously even wider.

We still don't get "misgendered".

ChaChaChooey · 10/12/2024 15:12

Helleofabore · 10/12/2024 14:19

Why would any random female presenting person be expected to be headed towards maternity at a hospital and not elsewhere?

Maybe Butters has a big ol’ 80s darts player beergut that looks a bit like a pregnant belly to hospital security staff who left their spectacles on the sink that morning?

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.