And then?
A paradox for me personally is the concerns about "capture" are the most strongly expressed today, whereas the threat from capture (Stonewall influence, self ID legislation etc) was greater in the past. Stonewall are a lame duck. Self ID is dead in the water. The Cass review has reduced the risk to teenagers.
Yet people like Truss are calling for the BBC to be defended and claiming the civil service is captured.
For me fact and fiction don't fully line up at the moment. What I observe in the arena of women's sex based rights is far less scary than it was. Yet the discourse has got more uncompromising and more insistent that there is some kind of emerging catastrophe.
When facts and rhetoric don't meet, that's when I start perceiving there to be a "culture war", where unfriendly actors (I.e. not people concerned about women and children) are using concerns for their own ends.
Unfortunately for me this trial looks like that. It's going to destroy the current incarnation of the Liberal party from what I can see. Who benefits from that? I doubt its going to be women and children in Australia - but it might be certain political factions and groups.