oops. I see now what the 'edit' was .
No, DrB, I don't believe that was an off the cuff remark. I think that fucked up sentence was a direct reflection on how that poster views posters on FWR.
It was then made clear in the post :
"Isn't it? That's how I feel about posters who say they are "so concerned" about a young person who is now deceased - so concerned that they discuss them using the wrong pronoun, visit Kiwifarms and sift through old posts and images of theirs (including surgery), etc. So, so solicitous! No, you're fuelled by these things."
This post above was absolutely aimed at posters on this thread. All because posters refused to use language that obscured Griffin's sex ( which is highly relevant and important information ) and a few posters use a site that stores screenshots of people's self published content. I take it the site stores that content in easy to access ways so people can view this content without having to go and search it.
And it was a site that the poster entered the thread to make the claim that because of their own characterisation of the site that the site was 'far right'.
("It encompasses all the hate and bilge that can't be expressed on the usual sites. This hostility and ideology stems most commonly from the far right.")
All that seems rather consistent to the many posters we see who seem content to demonise and vilify others while using hyperbolic and emotionally charged language to describe people who disagree with them. But who ultimately are operating under their own rather deep prejudices about the posters on this board.
I wish that I had your optimism that it was an off the cuff remark.