Not if you are involved with professional coaches looking to take you to international level it's not.
It's disengenous to say differently.
Why are the questions being leveled at individuals and not the experienced coaches, national governing bodies and the IOC?
Individuals are supposed to be looked after. Those who train them have duty of care responsibilities. The IOC has a duty to oversee duty of care responsibilities.
One of the reasons anti-doping rules were brought in, related to the well being of athletes.
We know that very young female gymnasts were deliberately made pregnant by their coaches and forced to give birth to improve performance. That lead to increased checks on international athletes and their medical wellbeing. Even then we've seen issues with abuse. And this is an ongoing fight to improve conditions for vulnerable athletes.
The IOC is responsible for governance and fairness. It sets out standards for good practice . It would be good to see this point reflected in debates on the subject and how there are multiple layers of observation.
A sex test is the final piece in a much bigger picture. It is not the first point at which an issue is noticeable by those with expertise and knowledge.